(received this from a friend, it makes too much sense).
The reported rise in anti-Asian American violence is alleged to be related to white supremacism – but it certainly appears, based on the available statistics, whites are not responsible for the increase.
The most recent examples have been black Americans acting against Asian Americans.
People aren’t stupid and even thugs are people.
Even if it is subconsciously, I would offer that the criminals are using the cover of “white supremacy” as a justification for their own racial animus.
I would argue that because the perpetrators know;
1) they won’t bear the full blame (because whitey made them do it) and
2) their offense will result in less punishment because they are not white, those two aspects incentivize them to act.
The existence of minority on minority crime is being painted over in favor of something that has both social and political power – namely calling the acts “white supremacy” and creating irrational and illogical reasoning to force the square peg in the round white supremacy hole.
Combine the “white supremacy” ruse with the fact that progressive District Attorneys in major cities have decided that crime isn’t really crime if your race has been historically oppressed and enforcing the law is a continuation of that oppression, and the problem boils down to simple economics.
Ronald Reagan’s old saying applies here – “If you want more of something, subsidize it; if you want less of something, tax it.”
The lack of prosecution is a subsidization of criminal behavior, prosecution is a tax on criminal behavior.
Shouldn’t be a surprise why violence across the board is on the rise.
