Chauvin Case decided

A panel of jurors has found former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin guilty Tuesday on all three charges in connection with the May 2020 death of George Floyd, after one of the most closely watched criminal trials in recent memory.
Chauvin, 45, was charged with second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. With Americans on edge as they awaited the verdict, the jury announced that it has found him guilty across the board.
His bail was immediately revoked and he was led away with his hands cuffed behind his back. Cheers and cars honking could be heard outside the Hennepin County Courthouse as the verdict was read.
Chauvin’s sentencing is scheduled for eight weeks from now, the judge said. He could be sent to prison for decades.
Earlier in the day Tuesday, President Biden weighed in by saying he believes the case is “overwhelming.”
He said that he had spoken to Floyd’s family on Monday and “can only imagine the pressure and anxiety they’re feeling.”
“They’re a good family and they’re calling for peace and tranquility no matter what that verdict is,” Biden said. “I’m praying the verdict is the right verdict. I think it’s overwhelming, in my view. I wouldn’t say that unless the jury was sequestered now.”

Woo or true? The decision is up to you.

Ground control to Major Tom…

Supposedly from a source in the intelligence community, take it for what it is worth and govern yourself accordingly, (I’m not predicting, just informing)…


“We are days away from a major military confrontation between Israel and Iran.

Iran has acquired 3 nuclear warheads from a stockpile of nukes that disappeared from the Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union.
The Iranians are very close to placing these nukes on missiles they have developed.

The Israelis are at most days away from attacking the site where these nukes are stored.

Afterward expect massive Iranian attacks and escalation to Israel nuking Tehran or a major Iranian population center, possibly on the Gulf.

Afterwards expect a major crash in the american dollar and the beginnings of a depression in the U.S.

This comes from a source in Chinese intelligence.

China will play a major role in the crash of the american dollar with their attack on Taiwan within 60 days.”

More 2A

To keep and bear arms.

Can you find anything in the 2nd Amendment, or any other part of the Constitution, that says the individual can’t have arms?Just keep in mind my question is not whether you think the Constitution allows individuals to carry guns but whether or not there’s anything in it that says they can’t?

Do you also understand that the Bill of Rights is not the source of our rights. It’s not even a complete list of our rights. The Founding Fathers did not believe we got our rights from the Bill of Rights. Nor did they believe they came about as a result of being American, Christian, of European decent, or white. They believed everyone had these rights even if they lived in Europe, China, or the moon. They called them Natural Rights. Where these rights were not allowed, they believed they still existed but were denied.

It’s a question as to whether or not our rights exist apart from government.

Let me ask you this; in a country where children have no civil rights, do they still have a right not to be molested? Do women in countries where they have a second-citizen status have the right not to be abused by their husbands, even if the government won’t protect them?

Then is it too much of a stretch for you to understand that the Founding Fathers believed everyone has the right to free speech, freedom of religion, the right to fair trials…?

Take it a step further. If the government passed a law tomorrow that said we didn’t have the right to free speech, or the right to free worship, or freedom of the press, would those rights no longer exist, or would they be simply denied? If the Constitution is amended depriving us of our rights, do those rights cease to exist?

The answer, according to the guys who set up this country, is yes, we would still have those rights. We’re just being denied them. Because of that, it’s the way we have to look at the Constitution.It may be, that in reality, rights are a figment of our imagination. But the Founding Fathers believed they existed and that’s how this country was set up. Rights are something that come with being human. The Founders never believed we got them from the government.

If and when the United States goes away, the rights will still be there.

(…to be continued)

Gun sales soar…

The Supreme Court has ruled that the words in the Constitution mean what the Founding Fathers said they meant, and we can’t go changing or amending the Constitution by giving new meanings or new shades of meaning to the words.

Gun Sales Soar From Stimulus And Biden’s Gun Control Plan .

Biden’s plan is to restrict assault weapons like the AR-556 pistol from Sturm, Ruger that was allegedly used by the Boulder gunman. But the violence has also prompted a rise in gun sales, and retailers have reported that they’re seeing more Asian-American gun buyers, seeking protection from hate crimes.

Since the start of the pandemic, more than 8.4 million Americans have purchased guns for the first time, according to estimates from the gun industry group, the National Shooting Sports Foundation.

“Americans continue to vote with their wallets when it comes to lawful firearm ownership,” said Mark Oliva, director of public affairs for the NSSF. “March’s record background checks shows that President Biden’s demand to enact a ban on AR-15s and the push by Democrats to enact laws that would deny Americans their rights is out of step with Main Street, U.S.A.”

The gun purchases have led to nationwide shortages in ammunition. Every gun retailer interviewed by Forbes is rationing ammunition purchases and some calibers are unavailable.

“Gun control” is not a function of the government. A broad statement you might counter, after all, the 2nd amendment specifically cites “a well regulated militia”.

You’ve got to understand what the militia is. In May of 1792, five months after the adoption of the 2nd Amendment, the Militia Act was passed.

That act distinguished between the enrolled militia and the organized militia. Before the passing- of that act, there was only the enrolled militia, which was the body of all able-bodied men between the ages of 17 and 44, inclusively, and it is that militia to which the 2nd Amendment refers.

It couldn’t refer to the organized militia because it didn’t exist yet. The 2nd Amendment was to ensure that this body of citizens is armed and that’s why the Founding Fathers thought to place it in the Bill of Rights. Legally, both militias still exist.

You might respond; “So, you’re also saying only people between 17 and 44 are allowed guns, right?”

No, that’s just the ages of the body of men constituting the militia. The amendment says the people can both keep and bear arms.

It’s usually been construed to mean all the people.

The law hasn’t changed, but even if we decide the word means something new to us, you can’t use the new definition to change the intent of the amendment.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the words in the Constitution mean what the Founding Fathers said they meant, and we can’t go changing or amending the Constitution by giving new meanings or new shades of meaning to the words.

And, if you think about it, it makes sense; otherwise, our rights really mean nothing. Congress or any other governing body can deny you the right to free speech, freedom of religion, a trial by jury, or whatever else it wanted just by claiming the words now have a new meaning. An oppressive government could change the Constitution without ever having to go through the bothersome ritual of submitting it to us, the people, for our approval.

And, in the end, the Constitution and, in particular, the Bill of Rights are there for our protection, not for the benefit of the government or those who run it.

(…to be continued)

Bats in the belfry

Are you awake yet people?


Former CDC director Robert Redfield told CNN that he believes the coronavirus may have escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology as far back as September 2019.

“I’m of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory… escaped. Other people don’t believe that, that’s fine. Science will eventually figure it out,” he said.


“It’s not unusual for respiratory pathogens that are being worked on in laboratories to infect the laboratory worker.”
“That’s not implying any intentionality. It’s my opinion, right? But I am a virologist. I have spent my life in virology.”

Redfield, a lifelong virologist himself, pointed out that normally when a pathogen goes from animal to human it “takes a while for it to figure out how to become more and more efficient.”


This is why he thinks the virus was being exposed to human lab cultures inside the virology institute before it was accidentally released.


Dr Anthony Fauci responded to Redfield’s comments by asserting that there were “a number of theories” as to the origin of the virus.

After spending months trying to negotiate the visit, WHO officials largely absolved China of blame for the COVID-19 pandemic after visiting a virus lab in Wuhan for just 3 hours.


A prominent German scientist with the University of Hamburg released findings in February of a year long study that concludes the most likely cause of the coronavirus pandemic was a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
You can fool some of the people some of the time…and most of the time, that’s enough!

We don’t need no 2nd amendment!

REMINDER: “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday that there is no right to carry a gun in public.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 7-4 ruling rejected a challenge to Hawaii’s requirement that residents must pass an application to have weapons outside the home.

That’s ludicrous, they state the only place you can have a gun is in your home. Forget the car, and you can forget hunting and everything else too.

Let’s see if SCOTUS upholds this. I would not be surprised if they did. Then what?

Your guns will be declared illegal, (that’s what) and they have already stated 100 million of them are. With nothing to support that claim AT ALL.

Whatever the commies say, is whatever it will be for as long as the people allow it.

SOURCE: https://www.washingtontimes.com/…/9th-circuit-court-no…/

REMINDER: “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”

Strangers in a strange land

“We are pilgrimsIn a Strange land
We are so farFrom our Homeland
With each passing day it seems so clear
this world will never want us here
We’re not welcome in this world around
We are foreigners who don’t belong
We are strangers We are aliens We are not of this world…..
We are envoys We must tarry With this message we must carry
There’s so much to do before we leave
With so many more who may believe
Our mission here may never fail
And the gates of Hell will not prevail.
We are strangers We are aliens We are not of this world…..
We are strangers We are aliens We are not of this world…..
Jesus told us men would hate us
But we must Be of good cheer–He has overcome this world of darkness
Soon we will depart from here—-
We are strangers We are aliens We are not of this world…..
We are strangers We are aliensWe are not of this world…..

Reparations

Reparations?


The Democrats in the House are pushing a bill for reparations to Blacks for slavery in the United States.

You may find it interesting that in 1860, when slavery was still legal in the United States, only 4.6% of US citizens owned slaves.

Out of that 4.6% how many descendants of the slave owners are still alive?
Of those that are still alive, how many still own slaves?

How many folks are currently alive in the United States who was a slave?

As part of reconstruction reparations to former slaves the Federal government awarded the 40 acres and a mule. Will those folks be liable for restitution of the current value of those reparations to the Federal government?

About 360,000 Union Soldiers died in the War Between the States that resulted in the abolishment of “unlawful servitude”.Shouldn’t that be considered as part of reparations in addition to the 40 ac res and a mule? What is the life of a Union Soldier worth? Will his descendants be eligible for reparations also?

The majority of current US citizens are descended from families that emigrated to the US between 1880 and the present. That was long after the legal abolishment of “unlawful servitude”. That number includes Asians and Blacks as well as whites. Why would they be liable for any reparations?

Perhaps it is time to desist from driving wedges between our citizens based upon the victim mentality exhibited by stirring animosity between ethnic cultures for political gain.

More on face diapers.

The bottom line here is, if you believe that masks make you safer then wear one, (or two, or four or whatever number satisfies your mind). It is a personal choice as protecting YOUR health is YOUR personal choice.

Do masks prevent SARS-2? Not according to a 2017 Oxford University study.

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747

For those who present studies that say masks work, those studies always look at how a mask blocks sneezes of coughs. They show that droplets will be knocked down by a mask and not travel 15 feet.

Well no duh.

But what they don’t tell you is the virus still goes through the mask, it just won’t go as far. They are lying to you if they say it blocks viruses. But they usually don’t say that.

They trick you with sleight of hand talking points. They say see it blocks droplets and bacteria from spreading far. But if the virus still goes through, a sick person has still contaminated the store you are in, and your mask will not stop it from getting to you. FACTS they don’t like.

By the way, even if I was wrong about masks, (I am not wrong – the science on this cannot change), but let’s pretend I am.

Your eyes are still exposed and you can catch the virus through your eyes regardless. That is a medical fact that proves masks cannot prevent a virus from spreading.

The bottom line here is, if you believe that masks make you safer then wear one, (or two, or four or whatever number satisfies your mind). It is a personal choice as protecting YOUR health is YOUR personal choice. My decision, after doing my due diligence, to not mask up is MY personal choice. It is a personal choice regarding MY health.