Brainwashing machine, (and it’s not from Maytag)

Mask mandates are not laws, by the way. When private businesses refuse services to individuals based on the individual’s private medical decisions and personal beliefs, the business and their employees are the ones violating established civil rights laws, which are established in every state.

Populations are being psychologically manipulated, primed to take vaccines in order to regain their freedom

As mortality rates appeared grim, with controversial testing kits, false positives and misleading diagnoses, people around the world were told to “stay home, stay safe.” As small businesses closed their doors and corporate profits soared, uninfected people distanced themselves from other uninfected people. The stage was set. The terms were written. Getting cell mediated immunity to a new infection was forbidden. Every surface, touch and breath was to be avoided and feared into perpetuity. There was a blackout on information that could help the human immune response. Antiviral treatments were blocked and ridiculed. Fear had become a virtue, and germaphobia became an unstoppable doctrine, weaving its decrepit philosophies and fearful controls into every aspect of society.

As time went on, governments and corporations imposed “mask mandates” to “keep you healthy.” The facial covering is now a form of obedience training and compliance conditioning that has become a placeholder for future vaccine mandates.

Mask mandates are not laws, by the way. When private businesses refuse services to individuals based on the individual’s private medical decisions and personal beliefs, the business and their employees are the ones violating established civil rights laws, which are established in every state. But the law no longer matters as long as Americans go along with their compliance conditioning until a new set of vaccines are available for injection. Presidential candidate Joe Biden has flouted the idea of locking down the country in 2021 and imposing an indefinite federal mask mandate – a prelude to mandatory injections for all.

Dr. Anthony Fauci promises these vaccines will be ready in 18 months, approved by an FDA that already admitted that these experimental injections will be unleashed even though they lack safety and only generate 50 percent efficacy for a short amount of time.

Developing a vaccine is a process that takes an average of 10.6 years, and only a small amount of vaccine experiments (23 percent) ever make it to market in that time. Even these “FDA-approved” inoculations come with their own set of risks which include lifelong debilitation and death. Vaccine injuries are commonly reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System every day. Because there are not enough funds set aside to cover all the vaccine injuries, the Special Master of the vaccine court only approves select injuries for compensation that meet a strict set of criteria (that excludes most of the adverse events included on the vaccine manufacturer’s insert sheet.)

This hasn’t stopped vaccine financier Bill Gates from promoting an experimental set of injections for every human being on the planet, rolled out in as little as 18 months, from companies that are indemnified from legal repercussions when their vaccines harm people.

This vaccine coercion continues even as convalescent plasma and anti-viral medicines become more readily available, lowering the mortality rate. As the survival rate improves and community spread dissipates, one must ask if the current situation should be declared a pandemic at all, or if populations are dealing with a virus that is now endemic, with rapid host adaptation occurring and questionable false positive test results. The economic, behavioral, and personal liberty controls pose a greater threat to humanity than a select pathogen, and are still being used against people coercing populations to submit to experimental injections.

The Rittenhouse File

…if someone burgles your house in the middle of the night. In that situation you don’t know whether they’re armed or not. You don’t have to wait for them to attack you before you respond. You’re entitled to strike first with whatever weapon comes to hand.

This is going to be blunt. In the coming weeks and months, the sheer volume of propaganda bullshit that’s going to be crafted and aimed at you by fake news over the shootings in Kenosha will seem almost overwhelming, but there are some fundamentals of law you should not lose sight of.

First off, every person has the right to defend themselves from anybody. That’s why the second amendment, the right to bear arms, was added to the Bill of Rights by James Madison and others. His thinking was once you have a standing army, it can be used by an unscrupulous government trampling over the Constitution to intimidate and suppress its citizens. Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur because MacArthur started to believe he was above civilian control, and that’s the start of a slippery slope that always leads to military dictatorships.

With the far-left fake news propaganda machine always rushing by reflex to the criminal’s defense and organizing a media lynch mob for anyone defending themselves, the situation reached such a point of confusion in a Florida county that the top cop sent a letter to all householders in it outlining your legal position if someone burgles your house in the middle of the night. In that situation you don’t know whether they’re armed or not. You don’t have to wait for them to attack you before you respond. You’re entitled to strike first with whatever weapon comes to hand.

When you’ve rendered them injured or unconscious, you call the police. What you’re not entitled to do is continue shooting or clubbing them when they’re helpless and no longer constitute a risk because that’s when you can be charged with assault or even murder. Put simply, if you’ve just put a bullet hole in a person and they’re down, you can’t just finish them off with a double tap to the head.

The same rules apply to a police officer who discharges his gun in the course of their duty. If he believes the subject constitutes an immediate danger to them or other people, he’s entitled to shoot. The emphasis is on believe. In the aftermath, the officer is put on administrative duties until Internal Affairs or its local equivalent have investigated the shooting and determined whether it was a good shooting or not. It’s not at all uncommon for a policeman to serve his twenty-five all the way to retirement without ever having to shoot his service pistol.

In Kenosha, a young man called Kyle Rittenhouse was running for his life pursued by a screaming mob. He trips and falls over and rolls over onto his back on the road. One of the gang dips in to stamp on him followed by another who hits him over the head with a skateboard.

The mob starts to close in on him, with one reaching down to grab him. I’m sure the footage that was shown last week flashed through his head of a man and his wife being dragged from their car by a mob, both being beaten up and the man nearly kicked to death when he’d already been rendered unconscious. He was in the exact same situation and had just grounds to believe his life was in immediate danger. He drew his sidearm and shot the man reaching down for him while the rest of the mob either fled or backed off with their hands up. He put a few rounds over their heads to discourage them following him while he walked towards the police line to surrender himself.

Looked at in isolation, that was a good shooting in anyone’s book.

What I find suspicious about the footage that emerged within a very short time after the incident is that it appears to be highly selective. Any flare up or incident while the Dem rioters have someone surrounded is always captured on multiple video phones, and yet in this case all you get to see is the pack chasing the victim. The same selectivity is apparent with video coverage of the man who was wounded in the arm. It shows him receiving first aid but the bit that was edited out can be seen in this picture which was taken before the video was shot.

He’s holding a Glock automatic, so it looks like he was the loser in whatever gunfight occurred. The fact that he’s still holding it after being shot indicates he’s suffered nerve damage leaving him unable to release his grip of it. What’s suspicious is that by the next time you see him being attended to, the Glock has mysteriously disappeared. Shooting an unarmed Democrat rioter plays a lot better to the fake news propaganda machine, so the next time you see that picture, the Glock will most probably have been cropped or photo shopped out of the picture.

Kyle Rittenhouse has since been charged with murder – within 24 hours – which is amazingly quick and definitely smacks of a political sop being thrown to the media and the various lynch mobs after him. His trial, if it ever comes to that, will last for months, but I suspect all it’ll do is raise him to the hero status people like Nick Sandman and the McCloskey couple currently enjoy. The hang him high commentary I fully expect from fake news may, like in Sandman’s case, prove good grounds to sue the ass off them once again.

Addendum:

Here’s something interesting:

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a 1) gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a 2) gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a 3) gunshot wound to the left hand, a

4) superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a 5)graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.

My comment: That’s interesting, because Kyle was in front. How’d Rosenbaum get shot in the back? Let alone the rest of it looks dubious, I doubt a .223 would merely graze and there’s no such thing as “superficial” with that round, the “superficial” hit to the thigh was likely from a hand gun.

You WILL comply

To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior

You WILL comply!

1984 was apparently an operations manual and not a fictional novel.

Liberal professor wants “morality pills” to be laced into water supplies to make people wear masks, socially distance

In order to force compliance among those who are resisting wearing a mask and socially distancing, Prof. Parker Crutchfield, a “bioethicist” from Western Michigan University, is calling for water supplies all across the nation to be laced with “morality pills.”

Those “deplorables” who are rejecting the narrative that staying away from people and covering the mouth and nose with cloth is somehow helping to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) need to be forcibly drugged in order to “convert” them into believers, according to Crutchfield.

A user of morality pills himself, Crutchfield believes that achieving total compliance is as easy as altering people’s brain chemistry with pharmaceuticals – and doing it covertly without people even knowing it.

“To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior,” Crutchfield is quoted as saying.

Though Crutchfield admits that the idea represents a “far-out proposal that’s bound to be controversial,” he believes it to be the most appropriate next-step for getting everyone on board with the pro-mask, pro-distancing plandemic agenda.

So-called “moral enhancement,” he contends, can be made “compulsory” simply by “administer[ing] it secretly, perhaps via the water supply.” He recently published a thesis in the Conversation, “a news site focusing on content ‘sourced from the academic and research community’ and supported by universities from around the world towards this end.”

Media manipulation and you.

Day after day, and hour after hour we were bombarded by oftentimes conflicting information from the “experts”. It must be true, we thought, after all this information is being given to us by experts versed in the “settled science”.

The media is a very powerful and useful tool and we lean on it every day and making our opinions and decisions.

I belong to a generation that once to believed, “if it was not in the newspaper or on TV it did not happen.” Today there is a dizzying number of choices in media, but in essence, it comes down to the fact that if it’s nicely packaged and repeated enough times, most of the folks are gonna believe it.

Because of the speed of our modern life, we want our information very fast and accurate, with the accent on fast. We want “flashy” and useful, but the accent is once again on flashy.

There are many choices, sources, and opinions on how we get information and from what media – but still, not many things have changed. We humans are still very easy to manipulate with and through the media.

The ways that people get manipulated through the media/information probably hasn’t changed for ages, it simply got more “sophisticated”, and we, the people, got more “plugged in” or simply more dependent on it.

As I look back, with my eyes open, it is very easy to see how we have been fooled by most of the media and pushed into actions that were not smart. But at that time, the manipulation was invisible to us. The media has and continues to manipulate people, bombarding us with fear and hate.

Take the case of the “virus”. We were bombarded constantly with loads of information about changes that were coming at us.

It was not only about the political system and the medical system. We were also consistently reassured about the importance of our opinions. After a period of time folks simply started to believe that our opinions could make change, or that our opinions were important.

Day after day, and hour after hour we were bombarded by oftentimes conflicting information from the “experts”. It must be true, we thought, after all this information is being given to us by experts versed in the “settled science”. 1st we were told that the virus was not that serious, then, and almost the next breath, we were told that millions would die.

This contradictory information was presented in such a way so intimidatingly logical that it was difficult, if not impossible, to question it. If the media is good at one thing, it is instilling fear. As time went on, we learn to fear others, we learned to fear physical contact, and, perhaps most importantly, we learn to fear those who thought and behaved differently than the “experts” demanded that we thought and acted.

The media, in cooperation and with the direction of the oligarchy instilled great amounts of fear in the populace by careful, subtle, and sometimes not so subtle hints. In many cases people didn’t realize that they were in the middle of a process of intimidation until, one day, they woke up and felt afraid. Afraid for their jobs. Afraid for their health. Afraid for the health and welfare of their senior parents. Afraid for the future of their children.

Fear is a very powerful motivator, and under the influence of fear, you can be compelled to do a lot of things that you might not otherwise do.

Normally kind and rational people suddenly became “mask Nazis” where they started to manifest hate toward groups of people or opinions that they had been manipulated into believing was opposed to the common good. As time went on and the hatred and fear progressed it became even easier to become manipulated by the media.

I’m not saying that you should trust no one and sit at home with a tinfoil at on your head but be careful what and who you trust when it comes to the media and the information you’re given.

Remember that the big media players and their governmental cohorts have their own agenda, and that’s the reason why they are big and powerful. They know their job very well.

Part of the solution is the today; we have almost infinite choices when it comes to information. The Internet offers every person the opportunity to look at opinions and offer their own. You need to do your own research, use the intelligence that God gave you, and find sources that speak the real, cold truth.

The bottom line is TRUTH! But be warned. Be certain that what you believe to be truth IS true. It becomes dangerous when you start to act based on completely wrong information or to base your plan of action on it.

College at a distance

The Covid-19 Plandenic has given the minions of the Deep State one more powerful tool in their bag of tricks of molding young and impressionable minds.

College at a distance

Institutions of higher learning are less about preparing you with information to lead a fulfilling life and more about indoctrinating you and creating someone just smart enough to pay taxes but not smart enough to rebel. The Covid-19 Plandenic has given the minions of the Deep State one more powerful tool in their bag of tricks of molding young and impressionable minds. A possible defense is distance learning.

Regionally Accredited Online Schools for Distance Learning

Accredited Online Schools

Accreditation is the recognition that a school or program meets the standards of an external evaluative body, such as an education council or professional organization. Some organizations recognize entire schools, while others only accredit programs in their industry. Online schools may be recognized by regional accrediting agencies that evaluate schools in particular areas within the United States. Interested students can enroll in public, private, nonprofit and for-profit schools that offer online education.

Public Schools

Public institutions are schools that are partially funded by the government. They may offer both undergraduate and graduate-level degree and certificate programs, and they may provide education in the liberal arts and more career-specific topics, like nursing or education. Although residents of any state are often permitted to enroll, the tuition rate is typically higher for non-residents. Here are five accredited public schools with extensive online offerings:

University of North Carolina

Pennsylvania State University – World Campus

University of Oklahoma

Arizona State University

Oregon State University

Private Nonprofit Schools

Private nonprofit schools are not funded by the government, but their main goal is to provide education for their students; they do not expect to turn a profit by offering degree or certificate programs. Like public schools, private nonprofit schools provide courses and programs in a wide range of subjects at multiple degree levels. However, unlike public schools, the tuition rate at private nonprofit schools is usually the same for all students. These five accredited, private nonprofit schools offer online education:

Boston University

George Washington University

University of Miami

University of Denver

University of Southern California

For-Profit Schools

For-profit schools are institutions that were founded with the goal of making money by offering educational programs. This does not always mean that their educational offerings are inferior to those of public schools and private nonprofit institutions, since they may also be accredited, indicating that they fulfill the same educational standards. However, it is important to note that tuition is sometimes more expensive at for-profit schools. Many for-profit schools also focus on providing career training programs rather than liberal arts education. The following are well-known, accredited for-profit schools with online offerings:

Strayer University

Fortis Institute

Capella University

Full Sail University

National University

There are several types of accredited online schools from which to choose. Students can earn degrees and certificates in a wide range of subjects through online educational programs.

What’s the Difference Between Regional, National and Program Accreditation?

Regional accreditation organizations operate within a given area, say, the Southwest or MidAtlantic. They were the first regulatory bodies to emerge in the American education system, so they are traditionally associated with higher educational standards and nonprofit, public or degree-oriented institutions. Some regional accreditation organizations include:

Middle States Commission on Higher Education

Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges – Western Association of Schools and Colleges

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges

National accreditation is a newer idea and is often linked to for-profit schools and religious institutions. Some national accreditation organizations include the Distance Education Accrediting Commission and the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges. Program accreditation refers to accrediting boards that focus on one degree field, such as education or nursing. Popular program accreditation agencies include ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology), American Council on Education, and Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education.

Why Is Accreditation Important?

Accreditation matters and here’s why — these organizations ensure that institutions of higher learning all adhere to a set of educational and ethical standards. Regional accrediting associations emerged in this country first, so they’ve been around longer and they generally hold stricter standards than national accreditation organizations (though this isn’t always the case). Students interested in a traditional degree should look for regionally accredited universities while those who want to pursue a vocational or technical degree might look for a nationally accredited school.

It’s for your own good-part deux

I no longer believe a word they say… it’s not about controlling a disease, it’s about controlling a population.

It’s for your own good-part deux

She was so excited about starting college. She’s a good girl, very conservative, hard-working, top of her class on a full ride scholarship. Anyhooo…. Just started classes on Monday but she (her phone) apparently came within ‘6 of someone who tested positive. who? Who knows… anyway, she had the option of locking herself in her tiny room for 14 days without leaving at all (food would be delivered once per day) or go home for 14 days with 2 negative tests. Someone suggested that she should have turned off her phone’s ability to “bluetooth”. Unfortunately for the students, its a requirement of the college that they had to keep their “tracking devices” with them at all times. One of the students at the university was telling us that one of his professors said that the goal was to run students to six weeks and then shut the whole thing down declaring a covid crisis… six weeks means the university wouldn’t have to refund tuition.

Meanwhile a neighbor had a fever last week. She had a church event 12 days from the time of the fever, with many elderly, and wanting to do the right thing called the doctor to see if she needed to be tested. They told her a “Covid specialist” would call her. He did and told her she needed to be tested. She called back the Dr the next day to set up an appointment and they told her she had to wait 14 days after her last positive test… She said I have NOT had a positive test! Turns out the Covid Specialist had put down she was positive….

I no longer believe a word they say… it’s not about controlling a disease, it’s about controlling a population.

Young adults today need to take a lot more personal responsibility for their own futures because national institutions are FAILING across the board.

The answer might just be “do-it-yourself” university. Tomorrows’ post will show you how.

History repeats itself

The current pandemic is different because, instead of targeting the vulnerable populations, we’ve gone for society-wide one size fits all at nearly the national and global level, and certainly the state level. That’s never happened – not with polio, not with the Spanish flu, the 1957 flu, the 1968 flu, or anything else.

History repeats itself.

August in Chicago is hot and humid. The overnight low temperature on August 23, 1954 was 74 degrees and the humidity was somewhere in the range of 90%. The window fans, for those who had them did little but move the heavy moisture laden air around providing little or no cooling. The prediced high temperature for a muggy Monday was near 100 degrees. It would be an ideal day for a child to spend at the beach, or at one of the park district pools or perhaps in an infatable kiddie pool in the backyard with the hose playing cold water over you to cool you down.

The public was horribly and understandably frightened by polio. There was no prevention and no cure. Everyone was at risk, especially children.

There was nothing a parent could do to protect the family.

I grew up in this era.

Each summer, polio would come like The Plague. Beaches and pools would close — because of the fear that the poliovirus was waterborne.

Children had to say away from crowds, so they often were banned from movie theaters, bowling alleys, and the like.

My mother gave us a ‘polio test’ each day: Could we touch our toes and put our chins to our chest? Every stomach ache or stiffness caused a panic. Was it polio?

I remember the awful photos of children on crutches, in wheelchairs and iron lungs. And coming back to school in September to see the empty desks where the children hadn’t returned.”

Parents tried “social distancing”—ineffectively and out of fear. Fearful of the spread of the contagious virus, the city closed pools, swimming holes, movie theaters, schools and churches, forcing priests to reach out to their congregations on local radio. Some motorists who had to stop for gas would not fill up their deflated tires, afraid they’d bring home air containing the infectious virus.

The virus was poliomyelitis, a highly contagious disease with symptoms including common flu-like symptoms such as sore throat, fever, tiredness, headache, a stiff neck and stomach ache. For a few though, polio affected the brain and spinal cord, which could lead meningitis and, for one out of 200, paralysis. For two to 10 of those suffering paralysis, the end result was death.

After World War II, Americans doused their neighborhoods, homes and children with the highly toxic pesticide DDT in the hope of banishing polio, Elena Conis reports in the journal Environmental History. Yet, the number of cases grew larger each season.

Most people who got polio suffered much milder symptoms — usually headache, stiff neck, fever and muscle soreness — that subsided in a few days or weeks.

After an outbreak in San Angelo, Texas the city council voted to close all indoor meeting places for one week. But the local epidemic didn’t pass that quickly, and by June hospitals were filled with patients. Tourism stopped because people didn’t want to be there. Cleaning fanaticism was the rule of the day. Most indoor theaters and bowling alleys stayed closed simply because people were afraid (no evidence of any fines or prosecutions).

This experience repeated itself in most places in the country where there were outbreaks. City councils would encourage the following of the directives of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (later the March of Dimes), which circulated a list of “polio precautions” for parents to follow. Some towns and cities across the United States tried to prevent the spread of polio by closing swimming pools, libraries, and movie theaters (not restaurants or barber shops) on a temporary basis but mostly in a way consistent with the public mood stemming from fear and confusion.

What’s remarkable in light of the near-global coercive lockdown for COVID-19 is how the terrible and terrifying disease of polio was managed almost entirely by a private and voluntary system of health professionals, innovators, parental responsibility, localized caution, and individual volition and caution where needed. It was an imperfect system because the virus was so vicious, cruel, and random. But precisely because there were no national or state lockdowns – and only very limited local closures done mostly in a way consistent with citizen fear – the system remained adaptive to changing conditions.

This was a time when, even for this ghastly disease that maimed innocent young children, medical problems were widely seen to have medical solutions and not political ones.

Yes, there were clear policy responses to these past pandemics, but they targeted the most vulnerable populations to keep them safe, while leaving everyone else alone. Polio was especially bad for school children, but that meant they closed the schools temporarily, in cooperation with parents and the community.

The current pandemic is different because, instead of targeting the vulnerable populations, we’ve gone for society-wide one size fits all at nearly the national and global level, and certainly the state level. That’s never happened – not with polio, not with the Spanish flu, the 1957 flu, the 1968 flu, or anything else.

As the health officials said of the polio epidemic: “Nobody can shut down intercourse of people in communities.” Our rights survived. So did human liberty, free enterprise, the Bill of Rights, jobs, and the American way of life. And then polio was eventually eradicated.

The slogan for polio eradication – “Do everything you can within reason” – seems like a good rule of thumb for the management of future pandemics.

Flattening the curve and other lies

The excuse offered to secure the passage of the 16th Amendment for the Income Tax was that it was only supposed to be a small tax to be more efficient than tariffs and wouldn’t be raised… it’s been raised over and over ever since. Many states would not have ratified it had they known this.

The welfare state began in the 1930s after the creation of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program. It was originally supposed to be temporary aid for widows with children who were suffering. It only grew from there and created a massive dependent welfare class in this country.

The Patriot Act was passed following 9/11 as a means to “fight terrorism” and was only supposed to be temporary while we combated the terrorists that attacked us. 19 years later Bin Laden is dead and it’s still around, more invasive than ever, and all the government now has to do is label you a terrorist and your rights are gone.

These Covid-19 policies are offered up as “temporary measures to protect us from the virus.” But they’re not going away. First it was just for “15 Days to Flatten the Curve” and it keeps getting extended indefinitely. Now it’s “until there’s a vaccine.” But anyone with deductive logic can see where this is going. There will be excuse after excuse to keep these measures in place until people just willingly accept them as “the new normal.” Should this country still exist in 18 years, you’ll have teenagers voting who grew up their whole life wearing masks, social distancing, being subject to random, politically-motivated lock-downs to silence dissent and crush opposition, and never knowing any of the freedoms we had before.

Welcome to the Peoples Republic of America.

If you read between the lines, the government has officially declared that everyone is the ENEMY.

This is forever now. The government never rolls back its power.

Welcome to the Peoples Republic of America

Normalcy Bias

“Normalcy bias, or normality bias, is a cognitive bias which leads people to disbelieve or minimize threat warnings. Consequently, individuals underestimate the likelihood of a disaster, when it might affect them, and its potential adverse effects. The normalcy bias causes many people to not adequately prepare for natural disasters, pandemics, and calamities caused by human error. About 70% of people reportedly display normalcy bias during a disaster.”

People simply can’t comprehend the “Horrific Hell” that is coming. If people would only study the horror of WW-II (The true horror) they would get a glimpse of “One hundred and Sixty-five MILLION” humans’ pain, their suffering, hopeless anguish, and ultimate death. Few of these were the Warriors. Nearly all were people like us, caught in a hellish existence, with their food stolen by their own country and their enemy’s country. Left to starve slowly while freezing to death. All of their earthly security taken from them.

As more COVID-19 tests, contact tracing, and antibody testing are done, the coronavirus positive numbers are on the rise, so they are using this to mandate masks, close up businesses again, and move for another lockdown to continue their fear games and wear people down.

This is psychological warfare, and if people don’t wake up soon, they will win this battle. They’ve already covered their bases, claiming that tight groups of hundreds of thousands protesting had absolutely no impact on the increase.

The problem is, the contact tracers are documenting everyone who came in contact with a COVID-positive person, as being positive without them taking tests. That will increase numbers astronomically.

On top of that, the CDC has already stated that the antibody tests can pick up other strains of coronavirus, meaning someone could have the common cold, and it is being recorded as COVID-19. The antibody tests are creating a major conflict in actual test results overall.

The media and politicians are also screaming about hospitals being overloaded in some areas but based on what people working within those hospitals are saying, that is not the case, and those that are testing positive have far fewer symptoms with a quick recovery. What no one wants to tell you is that the percentage of deaths are declining, and as of late May the death rate by COVID-related causes was only 0.05% – less than one percent.

Sadly, we are well on the way to Socialist/Oligarch hell. We became complacent and gave in to normalcy bias. Apparently Orwell wrote an operations manual and not a work of fiction.

Our sad fate, and our demise, is our attachment to being “Normalcy Biased”.

The new “Digital Normal”

Digital Society = CONTROL Society. Efficient systems to monitor, control, evaluate, and manipulate.

The removal of all ‘old technology’ and ‘old ways of thinking/doing things.’

Centralizing and removing the ability of individuals to possess or operate/conduct their lives independent of “the system.”

Digitization:

 Cashless society.

 Bookless society.

 Cloud Entertainment only – all digitized, nothing ‘in hand’ that cannot be ‘controlled’ (changed/updated) by central authority.

 Mandatory devices: If you want to interact with society you will be  required to carry a device (similar to a cell phone) for all access to  all ‘services’ – including food, water, shelter, medical,  transportation, communication, commerce.

This is just the beginning, folks.

Social “Legacy Systems”

Books, Films, CD’s, DVD’s (Especially controversial or non ‘Politically  Correct’ items) that individuals can keep/hold and cannot easily be  “edited” by the system

History: History must be ‘sanitized’ and  periodically ‘updated’ to conform with societal standards. This requires  the digitization of information and the removal and destruction of  hard-copies. Things like books, films, DVD’s, removable drives, statues,  personal libraries, etc.

Public libraries and museums can be ‘updated’ for political correctness to meet social standards.

Private transportation: Push for public transportation and mandate that  “personal vehicles” be completely monitored and controlled by the  state. Look for the elimination of personal privately-owned  transportation as “shared” vehicles (park anywhere drive anywhere) are  introduced – major expansion when “auto-drive” features are perfected. 

 [Hey! no loan payments, no insurance or maintenance, no gas fill-ups,  no worries! Heck, you don’t even need to know how to drive! All you need  is your digital Wallet.]

Private home ownership: Only great  estates, farmland, and “public lands” (owned by the state) will be  allowed. “CITIZENS” (that’s you) will live in fully automated cubicles  as nice as you can afford that monitor and provide your every need. You  won’t have to go anywhere to shop – your home knows what you need. It  will be purchased and delivered for you. Want something special? Get on  the cloud! In time, it will be available to you almost instantaneously.

Religion? Well, the state has a sanitized version of that for you, too!  You can believe whatever you want to believe if you prefer being  provincial. Of course, you may be ostracized for your beliefs…  possibly even declared a criminal. Much safer to believe in the state.  Haven’t we provided everything for you?

Well, there’s more – but  I’m going to post this now. 

Welcome to the NEW WORLD ORDER. 

 The NEW NORMAL.

One of the primary responsibilities of government is to maintain an adequate supply of the medium of exchange symbols we use in our economy. A manufactured shortage in coin is intolerable. I don’t care what their excuse is. If they can’t do the job, then they shouldn’t be paid for the ‘service.’

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution specifically gives Congress the power to “borrow money” and also power (and the responsibility) to “coin money and regulate the value” of both U.S. and foreign coins, and regulate interstate commerce, but does not explicitly and unambiguously grant Congress the power to print paper money or make it legal tender.

Paper notes fall under the power to BORROW money, because paper notes are bills of credit – an I.O.U. or promissory note. The various ‘Legal Tender’ acts do not change this – they simply make the acceptance of I.O.U.s mandatory, turning a money (stable hard-currency) society into a debt society.

It’s a workable solution as long as the debt never has to be paid (while passing that debt onto the people like an anchor about their necks) and you don’t mind an out-of-control government unconstrained in their actions. This, of course, was not what the founders designed or envisioned.

Part of the reason for hard currency in precious metals was to constrain government. It was also designed to ensure the people would have a durable, physical, valuable (due to scarcity) medium of exchange that they could hold in their hands and FREELY exchange without the requirement of any additional outside agency in any transaction.

Some folks say, “Paper and coin money is too much of a hassle. Going digital will make everything safer and easier. Besides, I never use the stuff anyway.”

So what happens if you lose your phone, card, or whatever payment device you use? What happens if the power goes out, if the signal is lost? What happens if you want to make a private exchange – off the books – for some reason? Whose business is it how you spend your money?

I can already hear the arguments in support of tech society… already have heard them. All I can do is shake my head. It isn’t easy being an anachronism. Best wishes for the future, folks.

You can’t stop progress, right? Sooner or later, though “progress” has a way of stopping itself. It’s usually quite painful.

We are being ‘guided’ into a cashless society. ‘Groomed’ may be a more appropriate term, given the modern implication of the word. The reasons they give for this are a lie.