At the crossroads

One road we could take is an objective application of the rule of law. No exceptions, no one above the law, no one too big to jail. High crimes and misdemeanors definitely included, no matter who or what the perp.

crossroads

We are at a crossroads in this nation.

One road we could take is an objective application of the rule of law. No exceptions, no one above the law, no one too big to jail. High crimes and misdemeanors definitely included, no matter who or what the perp.

I see about 0% chance of that happening.

Last Tuesday, 6/6/2018, on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich weighed in on President Donald Trump’s efforts to contain the so-called deep state.

Gingrich observed that with all the revelations regarding the Justice Department bureaucracy’s involvement in the 2016 presidential election that the system was “much more deeply corrupt” than previously thought; “And I think that we have to recognize that the system is much more deeply corrupt than any of us could imagine. That as it is gradually coming out in the open, we realize the elements of the Justice Department at the larger level, elements of the FBI, were corrupted on a scale that is really a threat to the whole American system and the whole rule of law.”

If we do not do it judicially, eventually plain ordinary people will get tired of watching the double standard play out over and over and all hell will break loose.

When you have Judges going against written law and creating their own in order to solve political needs, we are in trouble. Then when they get elected they will begin to pass laws that are incompatible with the Constitution, but are allowed to be enforced the the same Judges, then we are in more trouble. See California for such an example.

I expect a certain amount of corruption in government because by nature power corrupts. I think the level of corruption in our government will probably knock our socks off when/if reveled.

We have passed the crossroads to allow for such a choice. What you are seeing is the crossroads in your rear view mirror.

Venezuela chaos

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

If it walks like a duck

Did you know that the phrase “if it looks like a duck…” was originally about a mechanical pooing duck?

duck with bucks

Many people, particularly politicians, like to use the popular “duck test” when making a point about a particular issue or object – “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.”

Did you know that the phrase “if it looks like a duck…” was originally about a mechanical pooing duck?

In 1738 a French automaton maker fooled the world into thinking he’d replicated life, and accidentally created a flippant philosophical conundrum we are still using.

Although the first printed example is thought to be from an American poet in the 19th century, legend has it that people were saying this long before, in the 18th century, about a certain mechanical duck. And they were being very serious.

That mechanical duck was built to astound audiences, by quacking, moving it’s head to eat some grain which the mechanical marvel seemingly digested and then after a short time, the machine would round things off by plopping out a dollop of, what has been described as, foul smelling sh*t.

It just goes to show how more refined things in the 21st century are in comparison to the 18th century – as this automatic waterfowl was famous throughout Europe!

Not surprising then that the phrase entered common parlance.

While the general populace today is less likely to be taken in by a brass clockwork automaton, we still have a real life example in today’s political “leaders” of both sides of the aisle.

Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov used a version of the Duck Test in 2015 in response to allegations that Russian airstrikes in Syria were not targeting terrorist groups, primarily ISIS, but rather West-supported groups such as the Free Syrian Army. When asked to elaborate his definition of ‘terrorist groups’, he replied:
If it looks like a terrorist, if it acts like a terrorist, if it walks like a terrorist, if it fights like a terrorist, it’s a terrorist.

In their own way, today’s politicians walk, quack, flap, swim, consume wealth and gift us with copious amounts of organic effluviant.

So, if it walks like a duck…

Lame duck

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

One potato, two potatoes

The Iranian regime was providing “monetary and infrastructure assistance” to Al-Qaeda according to a letter signed by terrorist leader Ayman al-Zawahiri that was intercepted in 2008.

This week Iranian officials admitted for the first time to facilitating the 9-11 attacks on America.

The Washington Free Beacon reported:

Iranian officials, in a first, have admitted to facilitating the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the U.S. by secretly aiding the free travel of al Qaeda operatives who eventually went on to fly commercial airliners into the Twin Towers in New York City, according to new remarks from a senior Iranian official.

Mohammad-Javad Larijani, an international affairs assistant in the Iran’s judiciary, disclosed in Farsi-language remarks broadcast on Iran’s state-controlled television that Iranian intelligence officials secretly helped provide the al Qaeda attackers with passage and gave them refuge in the Islamic Republic, according to an English translation published by Al Arabiya.

The Iranian regime was providing “monetary and infrastructure assistance” to Al-Qaeda according to a letter signed by terrorist leader Ayman al-Zawahiri that was intercepted in 2008.

Barack Obama gave the Iranian regime $50 billion and a pallet of cash. …imagine that!

35076959_1945063805806195_3146689445609078784_n

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

A Republic, if you can keep it

Suitable for learning history…or wrapping fish!

For those who have followed this saga from it’s inception;
There IS a book!
It IS on Amazon.
As of right now, because of some technical glitches it is only available in a physical paperback format.
It costs $11.49

BUY THE BOOK

A_Republic_If_You_C_Cover_for_Kindle (1)

REVIEW THE BOOK

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

 

Just what, not why…

Busy week but most of the MSM coverage is fluff…who woulda thunk it?

surveillance puzzle

“Longtime former director of security for the Senate Intelligence Committee, James A. Wolfe, was indicted and arrested Thursday night, (6/7/2018), on charges of giving false statements to FBI agents in 2017 about repeated contacts with three reporters, according to the Washington Examiner.

Wolfe, 57, is a former Army intelligence analyst who worked for the Senate for over 30 years. He stopped performing work for the committee in December and retired last month.”

OK so Jim Wolfe:
1. Director of the National Intelligence Security Council (or some other BS DC entity with a similar name)
2. Affair with NYT reporter half his age and is giving her intel in exchange for the “comfort”
3. Wife whose name is actually JANE had been FBI from 1986 – 2016.
This would be too lousy a plot line for a bad TV series, but these baboons are using it in real life.
“These people are stupid” is the greatest piece of understatement in the Modern Age.

Also, taking a moment to honor the existence of William Binney, (a former highly placed intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) turned whistle-blower who resigned on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.

He was a high-profile critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA’s data collection policies during the Barack Obama administration. In 2016, he said the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election was false.), who no doubt spake thusly at some glorious moment: “We have it all.”

So, the big news this week was:
-James Wolfe/Ali Watikins, leaks/arrests for leaks ect.
-Obama secretly going against sanctions/giving even more money on Iran
-POTUS sanctions on EU, Canada, Mexico
-cemex ties to clinton foundation
-kate spade
-sister of queen of netherland’s maxima suicide
-trump leaves for g7  early
-awan/house it scandal back in the news
-McCabe squealing
-facebook in trouble again.
-google may be called to testify (for bias) per Nunes
– Bill Priestap and Strzok played more central role in Clinton/Russia
-Koch/Starbucks resignations
-Clinton email decision possibly made in April 16′
-RIGHT TO TRY (cures) signed into law
-Veterans choice for non-VA docs/hospital
-New opioid bills
-China spy arrested
-Trump/Kim summit Singapore resort back on…maybe

Busy week but most of the MSM coverage is fluff…who woulda thunk it?

weapons of mass deception

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

The end of money and the end of independence

People today have no sense of money. They show up to work and every couple of weeks the numbers on a website change. They wave a little plastic talisman at the store and walk out with what they need. No money ever changes hands just some 1’s and 0’s on a computer somewhere.

Lawyer-Briefcase

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”
— Henry Ford

No one believed me years ago when I said credit cards and these  ATM cards were a tool of the oligarchs to isolate you from your money and control your wealth (yes money and wealth are different).

Money is any item or verifiable record that is generally accepted as payment for goods and services and repayment of debts in a particular country or socio-economic context. The main functions of money are distinguished as: a medium of exchange, a unit of account, a store of value and sometimes, a standard of deferred payment. Any item or verifiable record that fulfills these functions can be considered as money.

Wealth is the abundance of valuable resources or valuable material possessions. This includes the core meaning as held in the originating old English word weal, which is from an Indo-European word stem.  An individual, community, region or country that possesses an abundance of such possessions or resources to the benefit of the common good is known as wealthy.

People today have no sense of money. They show up to work and every couple of weeks the numbers on a website change. They wave a little plastic talisman at the store and walk out with what they need. No money ever changes hands just some 1’s and 0’s on a computer somewhere.

When those in control shut down the little plastic talisman, all your magic money is going to go *poof*

The oligarchs have isolated you from your fiat currency for the same reason the Plutocracy in Washington DC used fiat currency to separate you from your gold years ago.

They control your wealth while you toil for their money, a cheap linen representation of tangible wealth or in the case of banks a small plastic talisman that is a fragile promise of access to your wealth that they hold.

The Federal Reserve Bank was founded on December 23, 1913, centralizing the power of U.S. banks into a privately-owned entity that controlled interest rates, money supply, credit creation, inflation, and (in a roundabout way) employment. It could also lend money to the government and earn interest, or a fee—money that the government could create free of charge.

So, in the final analysis, the money supply, government debt, credit creation, inflation and to a large degree employment is controlled by the member banks of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank. But the question remains, “Who controls the member banks?”

Interesting question, is it not?

Money-Ponzi

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

Diversity and you

We need go start teaching, speaking and making decisions based on THE WHOLE TRUTH.
The founding fathers DID NOT write in to the Constitution that ALL MEN (and women) ARE EQUAL.

I don’t fly if I can possibly avoid it. When folks ask me why, the short answer is that I know too much.

It’s been recently reported that the FAA is now actively recruiting new trainees to work in the towers and control rooms directing airplanes and that the criteria they now utilize to screen applicants is a curiously absurd “biographical questionnaire.”

The Wall Street Journal recently reported:

“A recently completed six-month investigation by Fox Business Network found that the Federal Aviation Administration has quietly moved away from merit-based hiring criteria in order to increase the number of women and minorities who staff airport control towers. The changes come despite the fact that the FAA’s own internal reports describe the evidence for changing the hiring process as “weak.”

Until 2013, the FAA gave hiring preference to controller applicants who earned a degree from one of its Collegiate Training Initiative schools and scored high enough on an eight-hour screening test called the Air Traffic Selection and Training exam, or AT-SAT, which measures cognitive skills. The Obama administration, however, determined that the process excluded too many from minority groups. In May 2013, the FAA’s civil rights administrator issued “barrier analyses” of the agency’s employment procedures, which recommended “revising how the AT-SAT is used in establishing best-qualified lists.”

By the start of last year, the FAA was using a biographical questionnaire (BQ) to initially vet potential hires. The questions – “How many sports did you play in high school?”, “What has been the major cause of your failures?” – seem designed to elicit stories of personal disadvantage or family hardship rather than determine success on the job.”

There are a lot of reasons to limit your flying to only the most necessary flights. The affirmative action angle is only a part of the problem.

Boarding an aircraft is like playing the world’s largest game of Russian roulette.

If I can’t drive, most likely, I won’t go.

We need go start teaching, speaking and making decisions based on THE WHOLE TRUTH.
The founding fathers DID NOT write in to the Constitution that ALL MEN (and women) ARE EQUAL.

That is a lie. All men (and women) ARE NOT EQUAL. They may be CREATED, at birth, (in most cases) roughly equal, and equally loved by God, but everything after birth, that a person says, does, experiences, decides, achieves, chooses, loves, hates, learned or failed to learn, values, honors , seeks, cares about, works for, commits to, and every other aspect of character and “track record” EITHER MOVES THEM UP OR DOWN the scale in actual, individual “competence, and value for certain pursuits among “the herd of humanity”.

Advantage, or disadvantage, “environmental factors” aside, because How we RESPOND, REACT to less than ideal formative circumstances is far more weighty in forming our future than the actual challenges we “suffered under”. Did we have abusive parents and decide “we would never be like that” or instead fill with rage and feel entitled to abuse others? Every other experience, (good or bad) can work to either lift us or defeat us depending upon how we react and respond to it.

Stop saying everyone is “equal”, they are not, outside of certain nor should they be regarded as such if truth matters (and it DOES) because denying TRUTH has unpleasant consequences, when denied.

Airplane-air traffic control

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

What the “Hegel” is going on?

Hegel’s brilliance rests in his ability to confuse and obfuscate the true motives of the planners, and millions of people world-wide have been trying to make sense of why it doesn’t work for over 150 years. But like the AA definition of insanity, the world keeps trying it over and over expecting different results.

On many days those of us who have two unpolluted synapses to rub together come to the conclusion that not only are we going to hell in a hand-basket but that we are currently living in an L. Frank Baum universe tumbling uncontrollably down the rabbit hole.

Some ask the question; “Is there a vast coordinated conspiracy of the elite?” while the media responds calling those who question “Conspiracy Wing-nuts”.

Perhaps, we need to take a look at the German “Philosopher” Hegel who gave birth to a “philosophy” named the Hegelian dialectic.

Hegel’s theory is basically that mankind is merely a series of constant philosophical conflicts. Hegel was an idealist who believed that the highest state of mankind can only be attained through constant ideological conflict and resolution.

The rules of the dialectic means mankind can only reach its highest spiritual consciousness through endless self-perpetuating struggle between ideals, and the eventual synthesizing of all opposites.

Hegel’s dialectic taught all conflict takes man to the next spiritual level. But in the final analysis, this ideology simply justifies conflict and endless war. It is also the reasoning behind using military power to export an illogical version of freedom and false democratic ideals.

The reason we can call it the justification for modern conflicts and war, with impunity, is because no one can prove Hegel’s theory is true. No matter how many new words they make up to define it, or how many new theories they come up with to give it validity, we can prove beyond a doubt that it is all false. And, we can show the final equation in Hegels’ Dialectic is:

A: The [your nation goes here] System of Political Economy
B: state controlled world socialism
C: state controlled global authority/utopia.

The Hegelian dialectic is the ridiculous idea that constant conflict and continual merging of opposite ideologies, as established by extreme right or left belief systems, will lead spiritual mankind into final perfection. (Americans understand man’s spiritual quests to be outside the realm of government control).

Hegel’s brilliance rests in his ability to confuse and obfuscate the true motives of the planners, and millions of people world-wide have been trying to make sense of why it doesn’t work for over 150 years. But like the AA definition of insanity, the world keeps trying it over and over expecting different results.

Hegel’s formula has been so successful that in 2018 all U.S. domestic and foreign policy is dominated by “One-world thinking,” the whole country is living under the new laws, and yet Americans most affected by “impenetrable” Hegelian laws have never once heard the term used.

There IS an agenda and it IS being executed.

Truth is what works.
-William James

truth-what people dont believe

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

Clogs, leaks, blocked sewers and government

Word has come out late on in the afternoon on Monday, June 4, 2018 that Bill Priestap will be making his first trip to capital hill on Tuesday, June 7, 2018. Hopefully, the Congressional investigators will come armed with questions regarding the seemingly never ending fruitless investigation of “collusion”. Maybe they will even get answers about who “colluded”.

Septic tank worms

On July 31st, 2016 the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign. They did not inform congress until March 2017. •At the beginning of August (1st-3rd) 2016 FBI Agent Peter Strzok traveled to London, England for interviews with UK intelligence officials. •On August 15th, 2016 Peter Strzok sends a text message to DOJ Lawyer Lisa Page describing the “insurance policy“, needed in case Hillary Clinton were to lose the election.
Recently there has been a great deal of interest in the origination OF the 2016 FBI counterintelligence operation, and how the FISA court was later used to gain Title-1 surveillance warrant against U.S. person Carter Page; part of that operation.

Remember the Peter Strzok trip to London?  The source of John Brennan’s “EC” is likely FBI and CIA operative Stefan Halper a foreign policy expert and Cambridge professor with connections to the CIA and its British counterpart, MI6.

Stefan Halper posesses a very specific set of skills from all of his prior work within politics and the intelligence community. Halper was in contact with every official and entity in the set-up; and Halper was in the right places at the times when all of these set-up meetings and issues took place.

Who would know who all the players were are what moves they made? Who oversaw these and other counter-intelligence operatives, including Peter Strzok? FBI Director of Counterintelligence, Bill Priestap.

Bill Priestap is the head of the FBI Counterintelligence operation. He was FBI Agent Peter Strozk’s direct boss. If anyone in congress really wanted to know if the FBI paid for the Christopher Steele Dossier, Bill Priestap is the guy who would know.

Word has come out late on in the afternoon on Monday, June 4, 2018 that Bill Priestap will be making his first trip to capital hill on Tuesday, June 7, 2018. Hopefully, the Congressional investigators will come armed with questions regarding the seemingly never ending fruitless investigation of “collusion”. Maybe they will even get answers about who “colluded”.

Maybe they should also bring some folks from Roto-rooter up to the hill to help them clean out the sewer that government has become.

Washington swamp

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

The Agenda-Part Ten

What we are dealing with is a run-away government hyped up on its own power, whose policies are dictated more by paranoia than need. Making matters worse, “we the people” have become so gullible, so easily distracted, and so out-of-touch that we are ignoring the warning signs all around.

Reposted from February 27, 2018

There has been a long-term agenda to change these United States from the conception birthed by our Founding Fathers to something where the power elite control the “Great Unwashed” through the cooperation and demands of the rank and file sheep of the flock. Some parts of the agenda span only a few years while others take over a century to unfold. You might call it a “ten-point program”, a “new world order” or “hope and change”. Over the next two weeks the plan will be presented in no particular order.

The Plan01

The Agenda — Part Ten: Gather and centralize power in the Federal government leading with the non-elected agencies and bureaus of the Executive Branch.

police state

The federal government has exceeded its constitutional bounds. Congress functions far beyond its “few and defined” powers, to encroach on those reserved to the states and the people. Examples include education, health care and various criminal laws.

Even more intrusive, however, are the more than 400 federal agencies that issue thousands of regulations controlling every aspect of our lives, from our air and water to our farms and factories.

The executive branch chooses which laws to enforce and issues its own laws through executive orders and administrative rules.

The federal courts now routinely decide matters of public policy historically reserved to the states, including life, marriage and morality.

Why does any of this matter? As long as we have food on the table and a car in the garage, why does it matter if we are governed from our state Capitol or Washington — by legislators or federal administrators? Unchecked federal power is not only oppressive, but a distant central government is less efficient, less responsive and more expensive.

The answer in one word — liberty — for ourselves and our posterity.

“Federalism is more than an exercise in setting the boundary between different institutions of government for their own integrity. State sovereignty is not just an end in itself. Rather, federalism secures to citizens the liberties that derive from the diffusion of sovereign power. … Federalism protects the liberty of the individual from arbitrary power. When government acts in excess of its lawful powers, that liberty is at stake.”
— Justice Anthony Kennedy

In short, the unchecked growth of federal power — without a counterbalancing state power — restricts individual liberty and threatens tyranny.

Here are just a few examples where the Federal government, (and our elected officials who are supposed to serve us)  has ignored rather than honor the Constitutional liberties guaranteed to us as Americans.

1) dictate school curriculum, testing, lunch menus and transgender use of bathrooms and locker rooms;

2) prohibit mining and burning of coal;

3) regulate ditches and canals as “waters of the U.S.”;

4) revoke accreditation of colleges whose standards are not “politically correct”;

5) force private religious employers to provide contraceptive services;

6) dictate overtime pay in private employment;

7) revoke tax-exemptions for nonconforming religious beliefs;

8) protect wildlife that damages property or threatens domestic livestock;

9) force one-size-fits-all health care plans;

10) limit use of public lands; and so forth.

Despite what some may think, the Constitution is no magical incantation against government wrongdoing.

It’s only as effective as those who abide by it. However, without courts willing to uphold the Constitution’s provisions when government officials disregard it and a citizenry knowledgeable enough to be outraged when those provisions are undermined, it provides little to no protection against SWAT team raids, domestic surveillance, police shootings of unarmed citizens, indefinite detentions, and the like.

Unfortunately, the courts and the police have meshed in their thinking to such an extent that anything goes when it’s done in the name of national security, crime fighting and terrorism.

America no longer operates under a system of justice characterized by due process, an assumption of innocence, probable cause and clear prohibitions on government overreach and police abuse. Instead, our courts of justice have been transformed into courts of order, advocating for the government’s interests, rather than championing the rights of the citizen, as enshrined in the Constitution.

The rule of law, the U.S. Constitution, once the map by which we navigated sometimes hostile terrain, has been unceremoniously booted out of the runaway car that is our government, driven over and left for road kill on the side of the road. All that can be seen in the rear view mirror are the tire marks on its ragged frame.

What we are dealing with is a run-away government hyped up on its own power, whose policies are dictated more by paranoia than need. Making matters worse, “we the people” have become so gullible, so easily distracted, and so out-of-touch that we are ignoring the warning signs all around.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the NDAA indefinite detention case—which challenged whether the government can lawfully lock up American citizens who might be deemed extremists or terrorists (the government likes to use these words interchangeably) for criticizing the government—is one such warning sign that we would do well to heed.

your papers please

The building blocks are already in place for such an eventuality: the surveillance networks, the militarized police, the courts sanctioning the government’s methods, no matter how unlawful, and the detention facilities, whether private prisons or FEMA internment camps, to lock up the troublemakers.

Americans haven’t been overly concerned about the rights of others, whether non-citizens or suspected terrorists, and now we’re the ones in the unenviable position of being targeted for indefinite detention by our own government.

It will only be a matter of time before they learn the hard way that in a police state, it doesn’t matter who you are or how righteous you claim to be—eventually, you will be lumped in with everyone else and everything you do will be “wrong” and suspect.

“When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing — when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed.”
Ayn Rand

avenge me

 

 

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press