It’s for the children!

Southwest Key has operated its facilities — 27 in total, across California, Arizona, and Texas — since 1997, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Flores v. Reno that unaccompanied illegal alien minors could not be held in detention facilities.

illegals in kennels

Child Border Crossers Have Higher Standard of Living than 13M Impoverished American Children, (let that sink in for a moment).

Migrant children who cross into the United States either alone or with adults have a higher standard of living once they are put into federal care than the more than 13 million American children who are living in poverty across the country.

In Fiscal Year 2017, the federal government referred nearly 41,000 unaccompanied minor border crossers to the Unaccompanied Alien Children program which is facilitated by the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

Data provided to Breitbart News reveals that each unaccompanied minor costs the federal government about $34,660 annually. This is a higher standard of living per child than the roughly 13 million American children who continue to live below the U.S. poverty line.

In 2016, there were about 13.2 million American children under the age of 18 living in poverty. These are U.S. children, for example, whose parents or guardians –in a household of four — earn less than $24,500 a year.

This annual income for an impoverished American family is $10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on each unaccompanied minor border crosser.

Overall, about $1.4 billion is spent on unaccompanied minor border crossers every year, which American taxpayers foot the bill for, as Breitbart News reported.

Most recently, Breitbart News‘s Senior Editor-at-Large Joel Pollak revealed the comfortable living conditions that unaccompanied minor border crossers are placed into by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Those comfortable living conditions include lodging, meals, clothing, medical care, education, recreation, counseling, among other services.


Inside Shelter for Illegal Alien Children Separated from Parents

The Department of Health and Human Services hosted Breitbart News and other media on a tour of a facility in El Cajon, California, where illegal alien children are being sheltered after being separated from their parents.

The children are separated from their parents — or, to be precise, from the adults accompanying them, who may or may not be their parents — when their parents cross the southern U.S. border illegally and are caught and detained.

Previously, under the “catch-and-release” policy, the adults would be released. Under the “zero tolerance” policy of the Trump administration, the adults are being detained and prosecuted. Under US law, children cannot be incarcerated with them.

However, families that arrive together at legal ports of entry and apply for asylum status are generally not split up and are permitted to stay in the U.S. pending the adjudication of their applications (which can take several years).

Democrats and the mainstream media have accused the administration of separating the children of “immigrants” from their parents and imprisoning them in “cages.” On Thursday, June 14th., CNN analyst and Playboy reporter Brian Karem shouted at White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders: “These people have nothing. They come to the border with nothing and you throw children in cages.” None of the reporters in the briefing room corrected him.

The facility at El Cajon, however, is not a “cage.” It is a comfortable facility providing lodging, meals, clothing, medical care, education, recreation, counseling, and other services.

It is run by a nonprofit organization called Southwest Key as part of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) Program, run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in the Administration for Children and Familes (ACF).

The facility is located on a main street in a quiet, suburban neighborhood. It has 65 beds, occupied by boys ages 6 to 17. The rooms are spare, with three to four beds in each; the boys are responsible for cleaning the rooms and making their own beds. There is an outdoor recreation area with picnic tables and a small soccer pitch.

There is a classroom area, and English lessons. The goal is “reunification”: letting each child depart with a legal guardian.

Some 90% of the children at the shelter arrived at the border without adults; the other 10% were separated from the adults accompanying them. Once the children arrive — usually brought by U.S. Border Patrol agents — they are greeted in the “intake” office, where they receive any urgent medical care, are assigned a case worker, and are given food, a shower, and new clothing. They are also given toiletries and lessons in hygiene — literally how to flush a toilet, brush their teeth, and operate the shower, which some of the children may have never seen in their lives.

The children receive six hours of education daily, which include lessons in English and physical education. The boys interact with girls who are housed offsite and brought to the shelter during the day to access its services.

They have limited access to telephones to call relatives, both in the U.S. and abroad. They receive therapy, both as individuals and in group sessions. They enjoy field trips to local museums, parks, and the zoo, where they can explore the city beyond the shelter. And they also have social activities, including a recent “prom” for which they dressed up.

“Cages,” these are not. What is immediately striking about the facility is the enthusiasm and care of the staff who work there. One administrator greeted the journalists on the tour: “Welcome to our home.” The children at the facility seemed genuinely happy, despite their unfortunate circumstances and the trauma of their long journey.

The real scandal is how the media have portrayed the shelters. When MSNBC’s Jacob Soboroff toured a similar facility this week in Brownsville, Texas, for example, he referred to the children there as being “incarcerated,” which is only true in the same sense that hospital patients, too, are not permitted to leave, for their safety. (One official who had seen Soboroff’s televised report accused him of “flat-out lying” about the facility — such as, for example, reporting on a mural of Donald Trump without noting 19 other presidents were similarly depicted.)

Southwest Key has operated its facilities — 27 in total, across California, Arizona, and Texas — since 1997, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Flores v. Reno that unaccompanied illegal alien minors could not be held in detention facilities. This is not a new problem, even though it took Trump to make the media realize it existed.

dreamers-MS-13

DREAMERS

Now available on Amazon…”A Republic, if you can keep it.”
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1717513069/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1528767387&sr=8-1&keywords=Patrick+C+Kansoer+Sr

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

Mockingbird

What we are being served up is not news and information but propaganda and mind/attitude control. What we are getting is what George Orwell termed “Newspeak”.

Operation mockingbird

Who are you gonna believe, Anderson Cooper & Wolf Blitzer or your own lying eyes?

A psychological operation, (psyop), is a military term describing a large scale operation to shape the hearts and minds of the people.
Its central, main operation is a carefully orchestrated hoax propagated by the media.
The military or other regimented organization does not announce hoaxes. Instead, they often (but not always) create drills. This allows them to stage all the necessary players to simulate a real event.

-massive media propagation. All aspects of social media and old style MSM media are used to promote emotional stories designed to evoke emotion to override reason and logic.
-a hero.  Someone goes above and beyond acting as a savior to…
-a victim. There’s often a fantastic dramatic story of a dead or injured individual, who if survived,  results in…
-a fundraising campaign . A grassroots (or astroturfed) campaign to raise money for victims (victims) or a greater cause.
-a movie. Since the psyOp is already a carefully written script to appear real, the movie is already written. Simply substitute better known actors to gain more attention, and you have a blockbuster movie or any other well polished ready made piece of culture creation.

Fortunately for Americans, the true nature of the Opposition Party and their product which is now known as “fake news” is revealing itself at a breakneck pace.

Some of us have known for decades.

I refuse to watch CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, HLN and, for the most part FOX for the same reason I don’t read the National Enquirer. The MSM, in general, is a circus sideshow, (with abject apologies to the circus).

If you think the media is bad now, just wait, media control is coming to your local news as well.

First, the FCC has eliminated its “main studio rule”, which required local radio and TV stations to have their main broadcast studio in or near their home town. This change will allow radio and TV stations owned by the same company to have their studios and newsrooms in a single location. This will allow the media giants to better order, govern and control the “local media”.

Second, the FCC plans to roll back some of its biggest rules against media consolidation. This will allow and lead to greater media consolidation and the loss of independent voices, as media companies will be allowed to own more radio, TV stations and newspapers in the same market. This is going to lead to many of the remaining locally independently owned radio stations being bought up.

It used to be that a media company could only own a maximum of seven (7) TV stations total nationwide. They have been upping that number to a large number over the last 20 years. After 1975, a media company could not own all three in the same market (TV station, radio station, newspaper). This was so as the news and media could not be controlled.

We have already been well beyond the media being controlled for sometime.

In Springfield Missouri for example both the NBC affiliate, the ABC affiliate and CW-Fox affiliate are owned by the same out-of-state entity, with the same crew of on-air personalities. Watching the local news is like sitting in an echo chamber.

I find it pathetic when one network is running an article about another news network’s article.

I also hate it when the news reports on what might happen instead of what happened. I don’t care what might happen, it hasn’t happened. I might get run over by a bus but until then watching your news show kind of becomes pointless. Tell me the facts and let me decide what they mean, if they mean anything

There is so much legitimately wrong with this world no network needs to present fake news or spin legitimate news to their side. Just report what happened. The good old who, what, when and where. The viewing public is smart enough to figure out the “why”.

I’m all for freedom of the press. They are supposed to be the vanguards in charge of keeping the government honest. But they cross a line when their reporting becomes biased opinions and not actual reporting of the facts.

What we are being served up is not news and information but propaganda and mind/attitude control. What we are getting is what George Orwell termed “Newspeak”.

Newspeak is an altered form of regular English designed and controlled by the state in order to suppress free thought, individualism, and happiness.

Now, doesn’t that make you feel “double-plus good”?

INSOC

Now available on Amazon…”A Republic, if you can keep it.”
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1717513069/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1528767387&sr=8-1&keywords=Patrick+C+Kansoer+Sr

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

 

Just what, not why…

Busy week but most of the MSM coverage is fluff…who woulda thunk it?

surveillance puzzle

“Longtime former director of security for the Senate Intelligence Committee, James A. Wolfe, was indicted and arrested Thursday night, (6/7/2018), on charges of giving false statements to FBI agents in 2017 about repeated contacts with three reporters, according to the Washington Examiner.

Wolfe, 57, is a former Army intelligence analyst who worked for the Senate for over 30 years. He stopped performing work for the committee in December and retired last month.”

OK so Jim Wolfe:
1. Director of the National Intelligence Security Council (or some other BS DC entity with a similar name)
2. Affair with NYT reporter half his age and is giving her intel in exchange for the “comfort”
3. Wife whose name is actually JANE had been FBI from 1986 – 2016.
This would be too lousy a plot line for a bad TV series, but these baboons are using it in real life.
“These people are stupid” is the greatest piece of understatement in the Modern Age.

Also, taking a moment to honor the existence of William Binney, (a former highly placed intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) turned whistle-blower who resigned on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency.

He was a high-profile critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration, and later criticized the NSA’s data collection policies during the Barack Obama administration. In 2016, he said the U.S. intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election was false.), who no doubt spake thusly at some glorious moment: “We have it all.”

So, the big news this week was:
-James Wolfe/Ali Watikins, leaks/arrests for leaks ect.
-Obama secretly going against sanctions/giving even more money on Iran
-POTUS sanctions on EU, Canada, Mexico
-cemex ties to clinton foundation
-kate spade
-sister of queen of netherland’s maxima suicide
-trump leaves for g7  early
-awan/house it scandal back in the news
-McCabe squealing
-facebook in trouble again.
-google may be called to testify (for bias) per Nunes
– Bill Priestap and Strzok played more central role in Clinton/Russia
-Koch/Starbucks resignations
-Clinton email decision possibly made in April 16′
-RIGHT TO TRY (cures) signed into law
-Veterans choice for non-VA docs/hospital
-New opioid bills
-China spy arrested
-Trump/Kim summit Singapore resort back on…maybe

Busy week but most of the MSM coverage is fluff…who woulda thunk it?

weapons of mass deception

Follow me on Twitter @OzarksAuthor

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018 Uriel Press

The agenda – Part One

Vladimir Lenin said; “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”

In “Mein Kampf” Adolph Hitler wrote; “whoever has the youth has the future”.

Since history, (at least accurate history), is seldom, if ever taught in today’s hallowed halls of education, most will not know the genesis of why Johnny can’t read, accurately make change for a dollar or control his emotional outbursts without being stuffed with psychotropic pharmaceuticals.

There has been a long-term agenda to change these United States from the conception birthed by our Founding Fathers to something where the power elite control the “Great Unwashed” through the cooperation and demands of the rank and file sheep of the flock. Some parts of the agenda span only a few years while others take over a century to unfold. You might call it a “ten-point program”, a “new world order” or “hope and change”. Over the next two weeks the plan will be presented in no particular order.

Point #1 Education: Deemphasize the individual. Through repetition from the earliest opportunity reinforce the “concepts of; “dependence on the State”; “The Collective Good” and “Social Justice”

Vladimir Lenin said; “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.

In “Mein KampfAdolph Hitler wrote; “whoever has the youth has the future”.

Since history, (at least accurate history), is seldom, if ever taught in today’s hallowed halls of education, most will not know the genesis of why Johnny can’t read, accurately make change for a dollar or control his emotional outbursts without being stuffed with psychotropic pharmaceuticals.

In 1899, Vermonter John Dewey unveiled his vision for remaking American education — a vision swallowed whole by “progressive” educators.

Dewey envisioned a society that assures “the full growth of all [of its] individuals,” a society in which “individualism and socialism” become one.”

The notion that society must guarantee everyone’s welfare would be pursued by Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Carter, George W. Bush, and Obama. But the fact that a collective can never be an individual eludes hopelessly theoretical progressives.

Dewey told parents that only a “radical change in education” could fix their children’s immodesty, irreverence, and disobedience. The likelihood that children just like 1899’s troublemakers caused trouble in every generation throughout Homo sapiens’ existence escaped Dewey. More amazingly, to address immodesty, irreverence, and disobedience, Dewey prescribed not structure, but squishy weirdness: “We must recognize our compensations — the increase in toleration, in breadth of social judgments, the larger acquaintance with human nature, the sharpened alertness in reading signs of character and interpreting social situations, greater accuracy of adaptation to differing personalities, contact with greater commercial activities.”

So looser morals, tolerance of slackers, and weaker judgment became central to the progressive’s lesson plan. In 1899, moral relativism and “diversity” debuted in American education and, as you are most surely aware, continues to clone itself in our educational system to this very day.

Recommended reading for the kids today includes Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and leftist Rinku Sen’s Stir It Up. Brainwash a child in militant anti-Americanism, and he or she will not have the capacity for critical thinking.

The sheep will follow the shepherd… all the way to the slaughterhouse floor.

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

FAKE NEWS

But these people have put the reporters’ reputation, even their jobs, in danger. Moreover, they have engaged in a serious abuse of the public trust and an abuse of power.

Who knows how many of these mistakes, spread over numerous outlets, came from the same sources? This seems newsworthy.

000000000Media-Trump-Hatred

Once again the “Mainstream Media” have exhibited their bias against President Donald J. Trump in their slanted coverage and commentary of Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

This “reporting” run by major news organizations, written and “reported” by top reporters and, presumably, churned through layers of scrupulous editing, turned out to be either misrepresented or completely wrong.

If we are to accept the pleadings of journalists, in their attempts at apologetics, we have to believe these were all honest mistakes. They may be.

But a person might then ask: Why is it that every one of the dozens of honest mistakes is prejudiced in the very same way?
Why hasn’t there been a single major honest mistake that diminishes the Trump-Russia collusion story?

Why is there never an honest mistake that indicts Democrats?

Maybe the problem is that too many people are working backward from a preconception.
Maybe newsrooms have too many people who view the world through an identical prism.

This brings three lines of questioning to mind.

First: Do news organizations typically run stories about documents they’ve never authenticated? Can they point to a single story about the Obama administration CNN has written using a similar process?

Second: Why would two independent sources lie about a date on an e-mail if they didn’t want to mislead the public? And how independent could they really be? How many stories regarding the “Russian-collusion investigation” has CNN run from these same sources?

Three: If sources lie to you, why not burn them?

There may be good reasons to avoid exposing a dishonest source. Perhaps it will scare away legitimate whistleblowers. Perhaps reporters want to preserve relationships with those in power — because they may help on other stories in the future. At the end of the day, you’re in contest for information.

But these people have put the reporters’ reputation, even their jobs, in danger. Moreover, they have engaged in a serious abuse of the public trust and an abuse of power.

Who knows how many of these mistakes, spread over numerous outlets, came from the same sources? This seems newsworthy.

When honest mistakes are found, the knee-jerk reaction of many journalists has been portraying themselves as sentinels of free speech and democracy. Often they will attempt to do this by contrasting their track record on truth with that of their perception that Donald Trump is untruthful.

What that fails to do, however, is undermine the ability of the press to report stories accurately. Trump didn’t make your activist sources lie.

The fact that many journalists have a political agenda is not new, but they have become a proxy of operatives who peddle falsehoods, and they have lost credibility with an even bigger swath of the audience.

It doesn’t really matter if it through sloppy or lazy reporting or if it is because they are willing accomplices in a “soft coup” against the duly elected President of the United States. The result is the same.

The media emperor is naked and he/she is peddling fake news.

000000000Something-Fishy

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018

Strange Bedfellows

Let that sink in. Senator Durbin was so “moved” by his young NAKASEC friends, that he will be willing to shut down the Federal Government if they don’t get their way.

00000000bedfellows02

Once again, the Deep State, in collusion with our dysfunctional “public servants” in the Senate, (from both parties) and with the willing cooperation of the (false) news media have fed a willing public a huge portion of chicken crap while telling citizens it was chicken soup. The average Joe & Jane Sixpack don’t understand why there are so many elected officials willing to risk our newly invigorated economy as well as our national security on behalf of illegal aliens.

As usual, there is more to this than meets the eye if you are willing to do a little digging.

On June 15, 2012, then-President Barack Obama delivered a speech in the Rose Garden announcing his intention to unilaterally grant “temporary relief from deportation proceedings” for young people who met certain criteria. The Executive Order, referred to as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, was “not amnesty,” according to Obama, “…this is not immunity.  This is not a path to citizenship.  It’s not a permanent fix.

One month after the president’s speech, a young woman named Tereza Lee met with about 40 young illegal immigration organizers-in-training to tell them the story about how she was the inspiration for Dick Durbin’s original 2001 DREAM Act, which consistently failed to get the votes it needed to pass, even while Democrats had the majorities in the House and Senate.

Last July, Senator Durbin, the Democrats #3 in the Senate and lead man on DACA talks with President Trump, invited HANA Center representatives into a “closed strategy meeting…about [the] Dream Act.” The group boasted about it on their Facebook page on July 24 2017.

Just two months before Dick Durbin had his secret meeting with the HANA Center, the group hosted the literal terrorist murderer Rasmea Odeh of the Arab American Action Network as their “honoree” for a “gala event.” Odeh is infamous for her role in the murders of the young Jewish boys Edward Joffe and his best friend Leon Kanner in a Jerusalem supermarket on February 21st 1969.

May 11, 2011, Senator Durbin re-introduced the DREAM Act in the 112th Congress with the co-sponsorship of 32 members of the U.S. Senate, including California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, as well as Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI), member of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus .

The first week of December 2016, Senator Durbin shared the story of Luke Hwang, a “gifted student and community leader who is currently a PhD candidate in chemistry at the University of Chicago,” on the floor of the US Senate. Senator Durbin used Luke Hwang and several others like him for maximum propaganda advantage.

In Senator Durbin’s speech he explained that Luke Hwang  “…is currently a PhD candidate in chemistry at the University of Chicago. He also works as a researcher at the university. In his spare time, he volunteers with the Chicago Korean American Resource and Cultural Center, an organization that provides services to disadvantaged members of the community.

He failed to mention that the Korean American Resource and Cultural Center (now part of the HANA Center) is part of a radical network run by old pro-North Korean activists.

In December 2017, NAKASEC and affiliates visited the offices of Senators Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, Tim Kaine, Mark Warner and Senator Dick Durbin. According to the NAKASEC website, Senator Durbin was deeply affected by the visit.

Moved by the efforts of members of NAKASEC and HANA Center from Chicago, Senator Durbin confirmed publicly that he will vote “no” on the upcoming CR (Continuing Resolution) if the DREAM Act is not attached.

Let that sink in. Senator Durbin was so “moved” by his young NAKASEC friends, that he will be willing to shut down the Federal Government if they don’t get their way.

Apparently Senators Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Shumer, Tim Kaine, Mark Warner, Lindsay Graham and Flake were also moved to put illegals above our military and our own citizens. Senators, the enemies of America are forever in your debt.

00000000bedfellows01

Nothing to see here… move along

The news cycle and the attention span of the public has moved the Las Vegas shooting incident out of the public consciousness. Nothing more of substance about the alleged shooter has been reported. No more news conferences or information regarding the weapons used or the weapons found.

59 souls reported dead and now two more who had survived fleeing the scene have experienced an equally horrific death in a single car crash just weeks after. And what do we hear from the Main Stream Media? Crickets.

According to the Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964652/Las-Vegas-killer-timeline-chaos-new-revelations.html#ixzz4x1aeToo6

Vegas gunman shot hotel security guard six minutes BEFORE he opened fire on crowd: Police reveal major change to timeline and admit they have no idea why he stopped shooting

  • Originally cops said that Stephen Paddock’s rampage was disturbed by a guard
  • Paddock fired through the door of his room, injuring guard Jesus Campos
  • But on Monday cops changed their story, saying Campos was fired on first 
  • Campos was injured six minutes before Paddock’s 10-minute shooting spree 
  • Cops had used Campos’s interruption to explain why cops weren’t delayed
  • Cops came just after he was hit, by which time Paddock was silent, they said
  • Now there’s a 16-minute gap between Campos being hit and Paddock stopping
  • And it was 20 minutes passed from Campos reporting he was hit to cops arriving
  • Campos wasn’t investigating gunshots, but instead an ‘open-door’ alarm
  • The door wasn’t specified, but was likely the stairwell next to Paddock’s room 
  • Paddock had tampered with it to seal it up before the shooting, SWAT team said 
  • Police are once more baffled why Paddock stopped firing on the crowd 

Reports from air traffic controllers at McCarran airport of active shooters: https://twitter.com/MikeTokes/status/924508300783185921/video/1

“There’s active shooters on the runway. They’re on the airport property”

0:50 / 2:20

Now in today’s Daily Mail there is this story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5030993/Couple-survived-Las-Vegas-shooting-killed-crash.html#ixzz4x1cq5XTs

Married Californian couple who survived the Vegas massacre die in a fiery car crash just half a mile from their home

  • Dennis and Lorraine Carver died when their car crashed into a metal gate
  • The husband and wife had survived the Las Vegas shooting that killed 59 people 
  • Mr Carver is said to have jumped on top of his wife to shield her from the bullets
  • They escaped uninjured before being killed in the fiery collision two weeks later

Hey, it had to be an unfortunate accident. They died in a car crash didn’t they?

Well, there is this from Huffpo: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html

According to a prominent security analyst, technology exists that could’ve allowed someone to hack his car. Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post that what is known about the single-vehicle crash is “consistent with a car cyber attack.”

Clarke said, “There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers” — including the United States — know how to remotely seize control of a car.

“What has been revealed as a result of some research at universities is that it’s relatively easy to hack your way into the control system of a car, and to do such things as cause acceleration when the driver doesn’t want acceleration, to throw on the brakes when the driver doesn’t want the brakes on, to launch an air bag,” Clarke told The Huffington Post. “You can do some really highly destructive things now, through hacking a car, and it’s not that hard.”

“So if there were a cyber attack on the car — and I’m not saying there was,” Clarke added, “I think whoever did it would probably get away with it.”

Oh, well… I’m sure the Powers that Be will get to the bottom of things and tell us the “truth” soon enough,,, time to get back to the breathless coverage about Paul Manafort.

Flip the lever, pull the chain

The only true secrets are those that remain hidden. The only true mysteries, those that can never be solved.

There are events swirling like street dirt driven by the heady gusts of an incoming weather front.

Redacted information from events over a half century in the past withheld; a 180 degree change of direction in the probe regarding an international adversary; sudden information available regarding those alleged to be “good guys” and none of it making any coherent sense unless you have a depth chart hidden in plain sight and therefore mostly overlooked.

We must remember that those pushing the buttons and pulling the levers that control the machine generally are not concerned with controlling particular lives, (especially those of little import to them). They wish to control events, sometimes directly, sometimes indirectly. It is about control, power and real wealth, and NOTHING happens without their input and approval.

The only true secrets are those that remain hidden. The only true mysteries, those that can never be solved.

Perhaps somebody will be fed to the lions

… or, at least somebody might go to jail.

The Obama administration knew that Russia had used bribery, kickbacks and extortion to get a stake in the US atomic energy industry — but cut deals giving Moscow control of a large chunk of the US uranium supply anyway, according to a report Tuesday.

The FBI used a confidential US witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather records, make secret recordings and intercept ­emails as early as 2009 that showed the Kremlin had compromised an American uranium trucking company.

Executives at the company, Transport Logistics International, kicked back about $2 million to the Russians in exchange for lucrative no-bid contracts — a scheme that violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the report said.

The feds also learned that Russian nuclear officials had gotten millions of dollars into the US designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation at the same time then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government committee that signed off on the deals, sources told reporters. (SOURCE: http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-controversial-nuclear-deal/ )

The Obama administration’s decision to approve Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One has been a source of political controversy since 2015.
That’s when conservative author Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
The Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions at the time, insisting there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for any member of the committee to oppose the Uranium One deal.

Before the deal was brokered in 2009, the FBI under Robert Mueller—who is now special counsel in the Russia investigation had begun an investigation into corruption and extortion by senior managers of a company owned by the Russian government’s nuclear company, Rosatom.

In 2009 the FBI found enough evidence to suggest Vadim Mikerin, who headed the Rosatom subsidiary Tenex, was corrupt and high-level officials at Rosatom knew about his bribery scheme. In 2014, he pled guilty in a U.S. court case to orchestrating more than $2 million in bribe payments through shadowy accounts in Cyprus, Latvia, and Switzerland.

Here’s the kicker: The Uranium One scandal is not only, or even principally, a Clinton scandal. It is an Obama-administration scandal.

The Clintons were just doing what the Clintons do: cashing in on their “public service.” The Obama administration, with Secretary Clinton at the forefront but hardly alone, was knowingly compromising American national-security interests. The administration green-lighted the transfer of control over one-fifth of American uranium-mining capacity to Russia, a hostile regime — and specifically to Russia’s state-controlled nuclear-energy conglomerate, Rosatom. Worse, at the time the administration approved the transfer, it knew that Rosatom’s American subsidiary was engaged in a lucrative racketeering enterprise that had already committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses.

The Obama administration also knew that congressional Republicans were trying to stop the transfer. Consequently, the Justice Department concealed what it knew. DOJ allowed the racketeering enterprise to continue compromising the American uranium industry rather than commencing a prosecution that would have scotched the transfer. Prosecutors waited four years before quietly pleading the case out for a song, in violation of Justice Department charging guidelines. Meanwhile, the administration stonewalled Congress, reportedly threatening an informant who wanted to go public.

The question has to be asked, “What did Barack Obama know and when did he know it?”

At the time of the 2009 FBI investigation, when the still unidentified Russian lobbyist became an informant, the FBI was led by director Robert Mueller, who is now the special counsel investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia. The investigation was centered in Maryland. There, the U.S. attorney was Obama appointee Rod Rosenstein — now President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and the man who appointed Mueller as special counsel to investigate Trump.

The Obama administration needed to make this case go away — without a public trial if at all possible. Think about this: The investigation of Russian racketeering in the American energy sector was the kind of spectacular success over which the FBI and Justice Department typically do a bells-n-whistles victory lap — the big self-congratulatory press conference followed by the media-intensive prosecutions . . . and, of course, more press conferences. Here . . . crickets.

The Justice Department and FBI had little to say when Mikerin and his co-conspirators were arrested. They quietly negotiated guilty pleas that were announced with no fanfare just before Labor Day. It was arranged that Mikerin would be sentenced just before Christmas. All under the radar. How desperate was the Obama Justice Department to plead the case out? Here, Rosenstein and Holder will have some explaining to do. Mikerin was arrested on a complaint describing a racketeering scheme that stretched back to 2004 and included extortion, fraud, and money laundering. Yet he was permitted to plead guilty to a single count of money-laundering conspiracy. Except it was not really money-laundering conspiracy. Under federal law, that crime (at section 1956 of the penal code) carries a penalty of up to 20 years’ imprisonment — not only for conspiracy but for each act of money laundering. But Mikerin was not made to plead guilty to this charge. He was permitted to plead guilty to an offense charged under the catch-all federal conspiracy provision (section 371) that criminalizes agreements to commit any crime against the United States. Section 371 prescribes a sentence of zero to five years’ imprisonment.

Obama DOJ’s Fraud Section was then run by Andrew Weissmann, who is now one of the top prosecutors in Robert Mueller’s ongoing special-counsel investigation of suspected Trump collusion with Russia.

So, here we have former FBI head Comey, his good buddy and special prosecutor Robert Mueller, current Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, (who appointed Mueller as Special Counsel) and former FBI fraud section chief Andrew Weissman all up to their eyeballs in a cover up of a criminal enterprise.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain…

 

Watch for a pivot in tactics

The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped to pay for the research behind a secret dossier on Donald Trump and his alleged ties to Russia during the 2016 presidential election, according to a report from The Washington Post published Tuesday evening.

The outlet, citing unnamed sources familiar with the dossier’s funding, said Mark Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, hired the firm Fusion GPS to conduct the opposition research. Fusion in turn hired Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to U.S. intelligence agencies.

The research was funded until just before the election, according to the Post report. The Post’s sources said that neither the Clinton campaign nor the DNC directed Steele’s research, and stressed that he was a contractor for Fusion GPS. (SOURCE https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-dnc-russia-dossier-trump_us_59efc1a6e4b0bf1f8836a7c4 )

Now, there are not one, not two but three different investigations, (one from the US Senate and two from the US House of Representatives) started to look into this matter. It has also been widely reported that the Justice Department will lift the gag order on a witness so that he may testify in these investigations and people in the FBI are telling news sources that they will fully cooperate in providing all documentation requested by the various committees.

The drum beat against President Trump continues from Democrats, Republicans and media in concert, but I believe we are seeing what could be a sea-change in the tactics from those applying the levers of power behind the scenes.

To quote Gilbert & Sullivan; “Things aren’t always what they seem. Skim milk masquerades as cream.”

Perhaps Madam Secretary and Billy Jeff are no longer useful to the real power brokers and are about to be cut loose…

…or maybe not.