Search for Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi-Turkish Islamist activist who hated Jews and backed Hamas, and the results are legion.
Search for Jerry Wolkowitz, an American Jewish journalist, at the Washington Post and you get zero results.
Search for Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi-Turkish Islamist activist who hated Jews and backed Hamas, and the results are legion.
Search for Jerry Wolkowitz, an American Jewish journalist, at the Washington Post and you get zero results.
While the Washington Post weeps and wails over Khashoggi, an anti-Semitic foreign Islamist, it has no interest in the murder of a Jewish journalist in the United States.
Jerry Wolkowitz, a longtime EMT, photojournalist and son of Jewish Holocaust survivors who was the victim of a vicious racially-motivated attack, has died at age 56 after nearly six months on life support.
On May 1, 2018, 25-year-old Jamil Hubbard allegedly approached Wolkowitz from behind and punched him in the head and face. He then allegedly pulled Wolkowitz’s body into the parking lot of his Freehold, New Jersey apartment building and ran him over with his car, leaving him for dead.
Wolkowitz was a freelance journalist and photographer for numerous publications including the Asbury Park Press. He was also an EMT and ambulance driver and volunteer with the Freehold First Aid and Rescue Squad.
Jerry Wolkowitz, a longtime EMT and journalist, has died nearly six months after a brutal, allegedly racially motivated beating left him on life support. He was 56.
Wolkowitz, described as an “innocent soul” by younger medics he took under his wing, was walking near his Harding Road apartment on the morning of May 1 when authorities believe 26-year-old Jamil S. Hubbard of Sayreville beat him and dragged him into a parking lot
Wolkowitz was hospitalized for weeks before being taken to a long-term care facility, where he stayed until his kidneys failed, friends said. Family members took turns to visit him each week until he died.
In the months that followed the assault, Wolkowitz’s loved ones remained by his side through infections and organ failures.
Hubbard “explained that he chose him because he was a white man,” Assistant Monmouth County Prosecutor Keri-Leigh Schaefer said in a September court hearing. Although Hubbard had never met Wolkowitz, he wanted to kill him because of his race, she said.
But the Washington Post can’t be bothered to care about a murdered American journalist. Just about anti-Semitic Islamists.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Should we replace her with the court of public opinion? The court of the talking head panel of experts? Should we place additional weights on the scales to compensate for past wrongs of “privilege” or “prejudice?
For all the recent talk about facts versus “fake news,” telling the truth, and recapturing the public’s trust in the era of President Trump, some of our most important media blew it when it mattered most. Worse still, some demonstrated an immediate willingness to trade this industry’s already badly battered reputation for a political victory.
We are now at the unsuccessful conclusion of a four-week-long effort by certain media organizations to prove Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is a violent sexual predator and a lying alcoholic. The reckless and grossly irresponsible scramble by the New Yorker, NBC News, the New York Times, and others to make Kavanaugh into a monster produced some of the worst journalism of the Trump era to date – and that’s a pretty high bar.
Journalists make mistakes, of course. But had all of the sloppy and often unethical reporting on Kavanaugh been the product of mere negligence or human error, the law of averages suggests that some of the errors would have been in his favor. None of them were. From great to small, they all tried to prove Kavanaugh unfit to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. It would be hard to blame a viewer or reader who concluded that these newsrooms acted not as the gatekeepers of truth, but as willing agents in the Democratic Party’s 11th-hour effort to destroy the judge’s good name, along with his chances of becoming the swing vote on the Supreme Court.
In this matter, the Rule of Law has been our dispassionate arbiter of justice.
She is depicted as blindfolded, with a sword in one hand and scales in another. She is blindfolded to accept parties who come before her with impartiality and without bias. We are equal before her.
The sword represents her authority and the force of government at her side. The scales represent the deliberative process that weighs the solid, verifiable evidence brought before her of the guilt of the accused of wrong doing. The scales must tip further to one side or another to establish guilt in a civil matter between parties. It evidence must show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in establishing a crime.
This is America’s icon of justice. To the degree we accept her as the arbiter of disputes and the decisions she reaches, we are in civil society together.
When large portions of society no longer agree to abide with her outcomes, and “resist” her system, we are simply no longer in civil society together with them.
When our Supreme Court Justices are no longer pillars that support her, we crumble.
Sure, she has flaws – she may be peeking or allowing a thumb to be placed on the scales or the sword to be brandished too heavily. We must always work together to correct that.
Should we replace her with the court of public opinion? The court of the talking head panel of experts? Should we place additional weights on the scales to compensate for past wrongs of “privilege” or “prejudice? Should we give extra credence to the weight of alleged survived victimhood?
As a person who believes that blind justice is “the best we got,” I will not agree to appease her resistors or to substitute Sharia or other international forms of justice in her stead. It is fundamentally not acceptable to me.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
The insurgency, led by Donald Trump, is an existential threat to the professional political class and every entity who lives in/around the professional political class. The entire political industry is threatened by the insurgency. The entire political industry is threatened by Donald Trump.
“Donald Trump’s supporters are angry“, or “uneducated”, or “unenlightened”, or (Fill_In_The_Blank). This was clear in the latest round of sunlight upon how officials within the Senate Democrats, United States Department of Justice and FBI leadership feel about a nation of citizens beneath their authority.
The corporate media narrative controllers are fully engaged.
The gaslighting is extreme as the same entities utilize their microphones in a brutal attempt to create a self fulfilling prophecy. In essence, what they are really trying to save is themselves. However, the reality disconnect only solidifies their irrelevance.
At this point, anyone still trying to convince us this entire assembly of our union is headed in the right direction, well, they might want to revisit their proximity to the 2018 election ballpark. Because they’re not just out of the city – they’re also out of the same state the election ballpark is located in….. But then again, the media know that.
David Mamet had a famous saying, essentially: …‘in order for genuine liberals to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things’… By pretending ‘not to know’ there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience, denial of truth allows easier trespass. The Democrat ideology depends on your unwillingness to accept their presentations; and your reconciliation. Do not look away.
There’s a level of anger far deeper and more consequential than expressed rage or visible behavior, it’s called Cold Anger.
Cold Anger does not need to go to violence. For those who carry it, no conversation is needed when we meet. You cannot poll or measure it specifically because most who carry it avoid discussion. And that decision has nothing whatsoever to do with any form of correctness.
We watched the passage of Obamacare at 1:38am on the day before Christmas Eve in 2009. We watched the Senate, then the House attempt passing Amnesty in 2014. We know exactly how it passed, and we know exactly why it passed. We don’t need to stand around talking about it….
We know what lies hidden behind “cloture” and the UniParty schemes.
We watch the 2009 $900+ billion Stimulus Bill being spent each year, every year, for seven consecutive years. Omnibus, Porkulous, QE1, QE2, Bailouts, Crony-Capitalism. We know exactly how this works, and we know exactly why this ruse is maintained. We don’t need to stand around talking about it…. We’re beyond talking.
We accept that the entire Senate voted to block President Trump’s ability to use recess appointments in 2017. Every.Single.Democrat.And.Republican.
Cold Anger absorbs betrayal silently, often prudently.
We’ve waited each year, every year, for ten years, to see a federal budget, only to be given another Omnibus spending bill by Speaker Ryan.
We’ve watched the ridiculing of cops, the riots, and the lack of support for laws, or their enforcement. We’ve been absorbing all that. We’ve been exposed to violence upon us by paid operatives of the organized DNC machine. We know; the media trying to hide it doesn’t change our level of information.
Cold Anger is not hatred, it is far more purposeful.
Cold Anger takes notice of the liars, even from a great distance – seemingly invisible to the mob. Cold Anger will still hold open the door for the riot goer. Mannerly.
We’ve watched our borders being intentionally unsecured.
We’ve watched Islamic Terrorists slaughter Americans as our politicians proclaim their uncertainty of motive. We know exactly who they are and why they are doing it. We do not need to stand around discussing it…. we’re clear eyed.
Cold Anger evidenced is more severe because it is more strategic, and more purposeful. Eric Cantor’s defeat, Matt Bevin’s victory, Brexit, Donald Trump’s highest vote tally in the history of presidential primaries or Mark Sanford’s dispatch might aide your understanding.
Cold Anger does not gloat; it absorbs consistent vilification and ridicule as fuel. This sensibility does not want to exist, it is forced to exist in otherwise unwilling hosts – we also refuse to be destabilized by it.
Transgender bathrooms are more important than border security.
Trade deals, employment and the standard of living in Vietnam and Southeast Asia are more important to Wall Street and DC lobbyists, than the financial security of Youngstown Ohio. We get it. We didn’t create that reality, we are simply responding to it.
Deliberate intent and prudence ensures we avoid failure. The course, is thoughtful vigilance; it’s a strategy devoid of emotion. The media can call us anything they want, it really doesn’t matter…. we’re far beyond that.
Foolishness and betrayal of our nation have served to reveal dangers within our present condition. Misplaced corrective action, regardless of intent, is neither safe nor wise. We know exactly who Donald Trump is, and we also know what he’s not. He is exactly what we need at this moment. He is a necessary glorious bastard.
Cold Anger is not driven to act in spite of itself; it drives a reckoning.
When the well attired lady leaves the checkout line carrying steaks and shrimp using an EBT card, the door is still held open for her; yet notations necessarily embed.
When the U.S. flags lay gleefully undefended, they do not lay unnoticed. When the stars and stripes are controversial, yet the Mexican flag is honored – we are paying attention.
When millionaire football players kneel down rather than honor our fallen soldiers and stand proud of our country, we see that. Check the NFL TV ratings – take note.
When a school community cannot openly pray, it does not mean the prayerful were absent.
When a liar seems to win, it is not without observation. Many – more than the minority would like to admit – know the difference between science, clocks and political agendas.
Cold Anger perceives deception the way a long-term battered spouse absorbs the blow in the hours prior to the pre-planned exit; with purpose.
A shield, or cry of micro-aggression will provide no benefit, nor quarter. Delicate sensibilities are dispatched like a feather in a hurricane. Pushed far enough, decisions are reached.
[…] On the drive to and from Chicago, I paid attention to the billboards and bumper-stickers. Folks, the people in “Fly over” country are PISSED, from the guy that guides hunters, to the mayors of towns and cities, to state senators congressmen and Governors who are voting to arrest and imprison federal law enforcement officials for enforcing federal gun laws that don’t agree with state law … The political pendulum has never, in the history of humanity, stayed on one side of a swing. The back lash from over reach has always been proportionate to how far off center it went before coming back … right now we’re staring at a whole hell of a lot of the country (about 80-90% of the land mass, as well as about 50+% of the population) that is FED UP. You really don’t want those guys to decide that the only way to fix it is to burn it down and start over… (more)
It’s too late…
DC has ONE option:
Remember, this is an insurgency. You must modify your mindset to think like an insurgent. Insurgencies have nothing to lose. If insurgents are not victorious the system, which controls the dynamic, wins. However, if insurgents do nothing, the same system, which controls the dynamic, also wins.
Do nothing and you lose. Go to the mattresses, and you might win. The choice is yours.
Right now, every day is Saint Crispins day.
If we are mark’d to die, we are enow
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God’s will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
Such outward things dwell not in my desires.
But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive.
No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England.
God’s peace! I would not lose so great an honour
As one man more methinks would share from me
For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
Rather proclaim it, Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put into his purse;
We would not die in that man’s company
That fears his fellowship to die with us.
This day is call’d the feast of Crispian.
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam’d,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say ‘To-morrow is Saint Crispian.’
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
And say ‘These wounds I had on Crispian’s day.’
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But he’ll remember, with advantages,
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words-
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester-
Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb’red.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered-
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now-a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.
The insurgency, led by Donald Trump, is an existential threat to the professional political class and every entity who lives in/around the professional political class. The entire political industry is threatened by the insurgency. The entire political industry is threatened by Donald Trump.
Decision time.
You know why the entire apparatus is united against President Trump. You know why the entire Wall Street apparatus is united against President Trump. You know why every institutional department, every lobbyist, every K-Street dweller, every career legislative member, staffer, and the various downstream economic benefactors, including the corporate media, all of it – all the above, are united against Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is an existential threat to the very existence of the UniParty. Donald Trump is an existential threat to every entity who benefits from the UniParty.
Multi-billion dollar contracts at stake. Trillion dollar multi-national trade deals at stake. The fundamental construct of decades of their united efforts to tear away at the very fabric of the U.S.A is at stake. They too have nothing to lose, and they’re damn sure acting like it.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
But make no doubt about it, the object of chess is ALWAYS to capture the opponent’s King and placing the King into check is a powerful offensive move that limits the opponents choices, they Must move out of check, no other choice.
FROM A FORUM I FREQUENT:
” How To Play Trump 5-D Chess…..Rules of the Game!
I think many people who support President Trump are aware he is playing “5 D Chess”, however they do not understand how this sophisticated game is actually played. They just know it is complicated.
I play chess; so allow me to explain a few key principles.
1. You have to understand the mind of your opponent. How they think, act and behave.
In this case, the typical liberal-Democrat is a highly emotional person, easily “triggered” and while “triggered” they act foolishly and make stupid mistakes. Plus, these Dems have no moral/ethical code of conduct, so lying and cheating comes very naturally to them. In fact it is an essential aspect of their character. They are easily “triggered” and behave in predictable ways once in this state of mind (which is often).
2. The entire swamp we know as D.C. has been a happy home for Dems and Republican traitors for a very long time.
They have become very accustomed to their corrupt environment which suits them very well. But now the swamp is being drained (and that takes time) but their happy/filthy environment is changing rapidly…and they don’t know how to adjust. In fact, they cannot adjust. They are not designed to function in clean, dry environments. And as we see in the animal kingdom, when the environment changes rapidly (forest fires, swamp draining) the animals panic, and flee for any cover they can find. Combine this with being “triggered” and the Dem is in complete panic while making stupid mistakes.
3. The Dems in D.C have also acted like squirrels, collecting nuts and burying them in secret stashes to be retrieved at a later date.
Of course, the Dems (like squirrels) are deeply concerned someone will find their stashes and take what they have hidden. But when points 1 & 2 from above are happening, the squirrel is now preoccupied and essentially forgets about the nuts. Big mistake. Because the 5D chess player wants to find and capture all those hidden stashes, therefore removing the contents from the playing field (think: bank accounts, weapons, drugs, contraband).
4. Dems are very good at pulling scams, because that is what they have been free to do, without any resistance, for a very long time.
The Dem, has not had to play against a chess master…ever! They are like the intermediate chess player who enjoys winning against amateurs and beginners who have little skill and no experience. Only the bully-type personality actually enjoys such a game (con-game) but Dems have enjoyed this advantage, and don’t know what losing really feels like. They are unaccustomed to not getting their way. When this happens, take the points from above and multiple the effect by a factor of 2x.
5. Finally [here we will limit the lesson to 5 points]
The chess master understands how the game is played, has years of experience playing the game, has the intellectual capacity for thinking multiple moves ahead, has studied the game and opponent and therefore knows the history, and the master takes the game seriously, professionally, and with confidence. The master does not display emotions, is not effected by unforeseen events and moves, and has had to play the game from a losing or weak position yet in the end manages to overcome these obstacles and challenges to win the game.
If you are familiar with chess, you recognize that games can take a long time to play. This is why a chess clock is often used, forcing each side to play within their allotted time. If the clock runs out, that player automatically loses, because they are out of time! In this way, as the clock ticks down, there is less-and- less time to think, strategize, and make the tactical moves necessary (rush rush rush = missing opportunities, and coming threats). This is when a sudden, unexpected, move (by the master) can throw any well laid plans to waste. But, the clock is still ticking, and the strategy that had been working is now useless or needs to be revised drastically.
Many players with experience will simply quit (in chess called resign) by knocking over their own King and surrender. Why continue to play a futile game that you can see will finally end in defeat? But Dems don’t think this way; they don’t know how. They can’t imagine losing. They fail to see that if they were to resign this game, they will save their energy. Because a difficult chess match requires intense concentration and is actually very tiring {the brain burns vast amounts of fuel when thinking hard} and over many hours, it continues to become more difficult to concentrate…leading to more mistakes.
And this is where we are now.
In chess, the opening moves are very standard and well established. Not much exciting happens in the opening, and there are many pieces cluttering up the playing field, and key pieces which require more room to operate have not been activated yet. Then the game begins to transition into the mid-game.
The mid-game is when the first exchange of pieces start taking places, normally even trades {Pawn for Pawn…Bishop vs. Knight) and the field opens up for the activation of Rooks and the deadly Queen. Now the game starts to really get exciting, and plans change quickly requiring constant focus and thinking many moves ahead. If this happens, that will happen, and then this is next, and they will be forced to do that, and then I do this, and they will probably do that, and then I gain an advantage with a this! Bang. In chess pieces are captured {not killed}. But in real life it is kill and capture. By necessity of the game, both sides will lose pieces, it is part of the game. Hence, soldiers will die.
When the End Game starts is a bit blurry. At some point, the playing field has thinned out enough, and out come the power pieces. Also by now, the King has been Castled, a special move that significantly protects the King from open attack, as well as activating a rook.
Trump has had enough time to open with a slow, and predictable opening. Some people are impatient, wanting to see the “good stuff” start happening. Trump has had the time to Castle (he needs a solid protective service of loyal guards and outfit his location with defenses) and that is done. The U.S. Marines have the Presidents back. And the mid game is going to go hot…right about now {Oct. 3rd EWS test?}. The End Game will not start anytime soon, unless the Dems make a Massive mistake, and they might. But that should not be expected. This will play out most likely.
But make no doubt about it, the object of chess is ALWAYS to capture the opponent’s King and placing the King into check is a powerful offensive move that limits the opponents choices, they Must move out of check, no other choice. But checks only start happening in the mid game and later.
How this translates into politics? The Supreme Court placements by President Trump will be the first powerful check in this game. It will suddenly prevent the Dems (and traitor Repubs) from doing anything they want. They will be forced to limit their moves until the checking stops. The Dems are highly emotional (but they are book smart) and they can see this is what is about to happen to them, and they can’t do anything about it except attempt to stall the inevitable. Once the Supreme Court is filled, it will no longer be an option for Dems to manipulate to their advantage and thwart Presidential actions. They are ****ed, and they know it, but they can’t quit, they won’t resign until CHECKMATE!
P.S. When the Republican Senator was asking Kavanaugh about U.S. Military Law, and Constitutional protections for U.S. citizens abroad…wasn’t that curious? And 9/11 was brought up in that SAME line of questions. This folks, signals we are moving into the mid game. Now, it gets exciting!
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Sherman Jacob. the owner/operator of snoopwiki.com accidentally acquires information regarding an international arms dealer doing business in his north-suburban Chicago neighborhood. Looking to make the biggest score of his life, he hatches a blackmail plot that explodes in more ways than one.
“A Wake of Vultures” – Book #1 in the series “Tales From The Deep State”.
The Kindle version of Wake of Vultures is now live on Amazon. There is a free preview option so, if you would be so kind as to click the link and leave a review I would be appreciative.
Balkanized America will have a fundamentally tribal feel. It will recognize the Contagion Model of ideology which is implicit in all Leftist thinking: we are not just opposed to our enemies, but to anything other than what we are.
We entered a new Dark Age some time ago when it became clear that Leftism, instead of bringing us an age of Light, was ushering us into an age of Grey, where entropy rules and greatness is extinguished. The Light was a lie; the real truth of Light is that you cannot produce it by demanding Light, only by maintaining balance between Dark and Light.
Sarah Sanders stopped at a restaurant called The Red Hen in historic Lexington, Virginia. The owner, Stephanie Wilkinson, perhaps in an attempt to get the fifteen minutes of fame one can parlay into media power in this bumbling idiocracy, asked Sanders to leave. Those are the basic facts that seem beyond dispute.
Where we connect to the Dark Age part, however, is that Wilkinson asked Sanders to leave on a moral basis: she finds Trump morally repugnant. Wilkinson argued that she excluded Sanders from service for moral reasons:
I’m honestly not sure why some people’s definition of war, in this case civil war, is defined by how many bullets fly in how many geographical locations?
Just what exactly would it look like if a group of wealthy oligarchs took over our government and used it against us?
What aspects would there be to that war? Would we perhaps quit being run as a constitutional republic and start being run as an empire?
Propaganda? What would it look like if our informational institutions were used against real Americans? What if the educational system was used against real Americans, what would that look like?
A financial/economic aspect? What would it look like if our monetary system and its debt and the ‘free trade’ agreements were used against real Americans?
A governmental aspect? What would it look like if an out of control intelligence community and justice department were used against real Americans?
A religious aspect? What would it look like if Church staffs were filled with people that didn’t believe the Bible was anything other than an opiate for the masses and used religion to lead real American believers away?
A health aspect? What would it look like if one group of oligarchs that controlled the food real Americans ate polluted it with chemicals and gmo’s? What would it look like if those real Americans sickened by the food monopolists had to go to another oligarch controlled enterprise – health care – which cared only about how many $’s it could wring out of the victims and could care less about real Americans actual health?
What about the safety of real Americans? What would it look like if the institutions we rely on for safety weren’t really about safety but control? What would that look like for real Americans?
What if the oligarchs wanted to use immigration policy against real Americans? How could that be used to wage war against real Americans?
Has the middle class of real Americans been flourishing and getting healthier and stronger over the last 40 years?
Has the government and the richest of the rich the oligarch class flourished and gotten healthier and stronger over the last 40 years?
Hmmmm…..why could that be?
Perhaps there has been a civil war raging for some time. Perhaps if we checked with the victims of violent crimes in the wreckage of the War on Poverty and War on Drugs they might have a different perspective on the violence of the civil war? Or if we checked with angel families? Or if we checked with the families of soldiers lost to the War on Terror the MIC’s oligarchs have been engaging in if there is enough violence to count as civil war?
Maybe its just me. Maybe I am just jaded. Maybe I don’t believe the above is all a comedy of errors or coincidence.
Maybe, I realize that the oligarchs want real America and real Americans dead and just simply face that reality. And call that a civil war.
“I’m not a huge fan of confrontation,” Ms. Wilkinson said. “I have a business, and I want the business to thrive. This feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”
Although it has not occurred to our media yet, this means that we have a parallel case to the question of whether Christian bakers should bake cakes supporting gay marriages, pedosexuality, or other Leftist darlings. They are also refusing to serve some people for moral reasons, and theirs are as important to them as Wilkinson’s are to her.
In the old age of Grey, our response would have been to defend the underdog because egalitarians always limit the powerful in order to raise up the unsuccessful. Therefore, both Wilkinson and the gay cake buyers would be underdogs because they were from marginalized groups, and Sanders and the baker would be out of luck.
In the new Dark Age, however, even though this has not occurred to Republicans yet, the correct answer is that we do not expect people to work together on a universal basis. Instead, we expect them to separate and differentiate which means that Sarah Sanders is not entitled to attend The Red Hen, nor is the gay cake buyer entitled to a gay cake.
As it turns out, trying out the new Tower of Babel that we call diversity and globalism has merely revealed why it was never created by nature. Groups of people need to be able to go their own way and differentiate themselves, so that they can try out their method of adaptation.
Some methods are better than others, and those groups rise while others fall. This irritates people because they fear the consequences in the reality of their mental fancies once put into action, so they try to make it illegal for some to succeed while others fail. That is the essence of “We Are All One” thinking.
In the new Dark Age, we are aiming for Balkanization. When you drive through America, you will no longer see a single flat mass where you have identical rights. Instead, you will see a topography of tribes where your rights will vary from nothing to full acceptance. Among your tribe, you will have privileges and duties, which are what “rights” become in the new Dark Age.
This new America will be more like the old or a futuristic space opera. Someone who goes into a Christian bakery looking for a gay cake may find himself staring down the barrels of a shotgun and possibly run out of town; he was in the wrong place, and needs to find his tribe elsewhere.
Balkanized America will have a fundamentally tribal feel. It will recognize the Contagion Model of ideology which is implicit in all Leftist thinking: we are not just opposed to our enemies, but to anything other than what we are. Other ideas, peoples, and ways are temptations which seduce us and then destroy us.
As a result, no restaurant will be for everyone just like no community will be. Sarah Sanders will never sit down in the wrong restaurant because she will know in advance who holds what territory. She will be armed, and expect to encounter armed resistance in the areas ruled by other tribes.
Just as the Tower of Babel collapsed from its own weight, the road to Hell paved with good intentions that is diversity and globalism has shattered. We are now living in the ruins, which will be determined with close quarters combat, house by house and street by street.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
the sheep might want to consider that the sheepdog works for the shepherd and keeps the sheep safe until the shepherd decides it’s time to slaughter them.
From celebrities calling on citizens to take to the streets, to members of Congress calling for the public harassment of White House officials, to mob justice at restaurants — is the US heading toward a new kind of Civil War?
Well, some people think the seeds of a new Civil War have already been sown — and in a recent article, University of Tennessee Law Professor Glenn Harlan Reynolds argued in a USA Today column that this new war is indeed “well underway.”
Reynolds was echoing similar comments from political scientist Thomas Schaller who wrote in a recent Bloomberg column that America is “at the beginning of a soft civil war,” and author Tom Ricks who agreed that the country seems to be “lurching” in that direction.
‘God is on our side!’
Representative Maxine Waters (D-California) caused a huge stir when she encouraged critics of the White House’s immigration policies to go out and harass members of the Trump administration in public. Waters made an impassioned call for citizens to ensure there would be “no sleep, no peace” for White House officials.
“If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. You push back on them. Tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she said.
But her comments were so extreme and incendiary that it prompted a former secret service agent to call them “dangerous” and warned they “go beyond breaking the norms” of civil discourse and criticized her for “endorsing mob-rule to satisfy a political goal.”
Not long after Waters’ comments, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders was asked to leave a restaurant in Virginia because she works for the Trump administration.
‘Surround their homes and schools in protest!’
Celebrities are getting in on the action, too, encouraging Americans to take to the streets in the millions to protest the Trump administration.
Comments by actor Peter Fonda put the secret service on alert when he suggested that Trump’s 12-year-old son Barron should be taken from his mother Melania and put “in a cage with pedophiles” and that citizens should “surround the schools” of administration officials’ children in response to the child-separation policy.
Somewhat less dramatically, other Hollywood figures have called for protests and change. Actor John Cusack accused the Trump administration of “fascism” and “torturing” children — while musician Serj Tankian wrote on Instagram that the US is in a state of “utter regression” and that it is time for a “peaceful revolution.”
Confederate monuments controversy
The fierce debate over the removal of confederate monuments and symbols across the US epitomizes the current political and social divide and the competing interpretations of American history, with one side believing the monuments revere figures who fought to maintain slavery while the other side believes they honor great patriots.
When white supremacist Dylann Roof killed nine black Americans attending a prayer service in Virginia in 2015, it prompted a movement to have Confederate monuments removed from public spaces across the country. More than 100 publicly-supported monuments and symbols have been removed since 2015 — but not without controversy and counter-protests. While monuments are being removed across the US, other groups are pushing for new ones to be erected.
Media wars, polarization of opinion
All of this social discord is playing out, magnified, on Americans’ TV screens in a way that appears to be exacerbating the problem. Eager to up their ratings, news networks invite the most polarizing of guests for daily screaming matches to be beamed into people’s homes. Traditional “News” organizations such as CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and Washington Post as well as modern “informational” outlets on the internet like Twitter, Google and Facebook have abandoned informational reportage in favor of “fake news” and “propaganda.”
In his article, Reynolds wrote that news media which “promote shrieking outrage in pursuit of ratings and page views, are making the problem worse” and reminisced about a time when Americans could disagree with each other without hating each other.
Stratification of society
While all this is being played out on TV screens and social media, those at the fringes of society are feeling the effects of a sick system perhaps more than anyone. The socio-economic stratification of American society appears more obvious than it has at any time in recent years.
Alleged inequality and supposed police violence against African-Americans is the given “reason” that prompted the NFL kneeling protests, which turned into a nationwide controversy between Americans who are proud of their flag and national anthem and all they stand for — and those who claim true freedom and justice have not yet come to America. Manufactured crises such as an opioid crisis, child poverty rates, and a constant drumbeat to pit Black against White; poor against wealthy; labor against business, have all inflamed anger and division in America from a simmer to a boil.
Americans don’t feel social ties which transcend politics. It’s all us vs. them — and nothing in between. Churches, fraternal organizations and neighborhoods used to cross political lines, American cohesion has “shrunk and decayed” and people are increasingly finding their identity only in victimization politics.
Marriage counselors say that a relationship is doomed to fail when the couple begin to view each other with contempt — and in America today, there seems to be nothing but feelings of contempt felt on both sides of the political spectrum.
If possible, we need to step back and ask some pertinent questions;
“Who gains power or advantage from the fomented chaos?”
“Who gains wealth or influence from the fomented chaos?”
“Who would lose power, advantage, wealth or influence if the American people were to coalesce and unite once again in common purpose?
There are, unfortunately, members of our society who look upon media, political parties and government as protectors of society. Something like sheepdogs who protect the sheep. Perhaps so, but the sheep might want to consider that the sheepdog works for the shepherd and keeps the sheep safe until the shepherd decides it’s time to slaughter them.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
As the political soap-opera that is referred to as governance in the United States continues to spin crazily out of control it becomes obvious that the vast majority of our political “leaders” have less collective intellect that gerbils and the leadership instincts of lemmings.
The defining feature of gang life is personal loyalty trumps all else. This is true for low level street gangs, as well as highly complex organized crime gangs. The rules are not written down or agreed to by consensus. They are imposed top-down by a group of men loyal to one man. The head of a drug cartel has lieutenants to enforce discipline on the the sub-groups down the line. The rules within those groups are similarly enforced by lieutenants loyal to the guy in charge of the group. This continues down to the street level gangsters.
The effect of this is a chaotic lawlessness. The punishment for the exact same transgression may be wildly different in two different cases. It all depends upon the relationship between the boss and the offender. While all criminal organizations have rules against betraying confidences, there’s no hard and fast rule on the punishment, despite what you see on television. Baltimore gangsters rat on one another all the time to get better prison terms, without facing a universally applied death penalty for snitching.
Consider what we are watching with our government. News brings word that the US Attorney is dropping charges against the terrorists, who went on a rampage during the inauguration last year. They announced this in a holiday week, so it would get the least amount of news coverage. Now, they certainly could have looked into who financed the riot, who helped organize it and then went after the shot callers, but they never bothered to do that. Instead, they sat on it until people forgot about it and then dropped the case.
Now, we have mountains of laws for dealing with self-defined criminal groups. The Feds could go after a Lacy MacAuley, who details her activities on-line, in order to figure out who pays her rent. Then they could go after that person or group. This is basic police work. At the very minimum, the people financing these terrorists would know they have some exposure, but that never happens. You see, everyone knows who finances Antifa and other terrorists operations and they have friends in high places.
Here’s another example. Peter Strozk is the focus of a very serious criminal conspiracy to subvert the last election. A mountain of evidence pointing to his guilt has been in the public domain for a year, yet he was just recently fired from the FBI. He has not been charged with anything and it appears he will never be charged. In fact, he is now telling Congress he has no intention of testifying. It is not that he plans to take the fifth. He is not going to show up. Their silly laws no longer apply to people in his gang.
Again, this gets to the way in which gang life operates. There may be rules, but what matters is who enforces the rules and on whom the rules are to be applied. In this case, the wide ranging criminal organization known as the Democratic Party will never let their people get punished by the Republicans. Those rules about complying with a subpoena from Congress only apply when the gangsters with power can enforce them and they will only enforce them when it suits their interests. This is gang life. This is the gangster state.
This becomes more obvious when looking at the whole criminal enterprise that is currently called the FBI. There’s no question that the people at the top engaged in a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy to spy on the Trump campaign and engineer a criminal investigation of his administration, for the purpose of removing him from office. This is the one explanation that explains the mountain of evidence piled up in the public domain. This is so obvious that no one bothers to deny it. Instead, the game is to avoid discussing it in public.
Lurking in the secret FBI files can be only three possibilities, with regards to this conspiracy. One, there is proof they cooked the whole thing to help get Hillary Clinton elected. The other is some out of left field explanation for the mountain of data, that points to an innocent motive. The final option is a massive hole in the system where the damning proof used to exists, but has now been destroyed as part of the cover-up. To date, the FBI and DOJ refuse to comply with Congressional subpoenas to answer this question.
Again, we’re back to the gangster model. The people inside these agencies have a primary loyalty to the gang, not to the laws of the country or the alleged institutions charged with promulgating and enforcing the laws. In gang life, you are first loyal to the gang and that’s what we see with this case. Rod Rosenstein was sent to Congress in order to deliver a threat to Congress, if they persisted in their interference with the gang’s business. In a prior age, Devin Nunes would have found a black palm print on his door.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley late Friday night. September 21st, granted another extension to Christine Blasey Ford to decide on whether she will testify to the committee regarding her 37 year old sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee, Bret Kavanaugh. Shame on you Senator Grassley, I have to wonder who got to you. Did you learn drawing red lines in the sand from former president Obama?
As the political soap-opera that is referred to as governance in the United States continues to spin crazily out of control it becomes obvious that the vast majority of our political “leaders” have less collective intellect that gerbils and the leadership instincts of lemmings.
Sadly, regardless of what some of us who actually were taught US history and government before public “education” became collectivist indoctrination, our government and the bedrock document, the Constitution, have been prostituted to establishing the notion of reasonable foolishness and foolish reason as a generic principle of an old French farce.
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Usually families of victims show up in support of POTUS after the crimes committed against their loved ones, why is it not the same here?
Whats going on in Iowa? The case of Molly Tibbetts has drawn new attention to the hundreds of other Iowans on the state Division of Criminal Investigation’s missing persons list. Among juveniles, girls are more likely to disappear than boys.
Race also plays a role: Black people make up a disproportionate amount of the missing persons list compared to the overall population of Iowa, especially among those 18 or younger.
What is under reported if reported at all is the activity of MS13 in Iowa.
The Mara Salvatrucha, or MS13, is perhaps the most notorious street gang in the Western Hemisphere. While it has its origins in the poor, refugee-laden neighborhoods of 1980s Los Angeles, the gang’s reach now extends from Central American nations like El Salvador and through Mexico, the United States and Canada. They rob, extort and bully their way into neighborhoods and have gradually turned to transnational crimes such as human smuggling and drug trafficking.
Drawn by the tens of thousands of Central American migrants seeking illicit passage through Mexico to the United States, the MS13 has developed into one of the foremost players in the nation’s thriving human trafficking industry.
MS13 provides crucial manpower for the foreign organizations, helping gangs like the Zetas and the Sinaloa Cartel sell drugs in the local market, intimidate rivals, and carry out executions.
It has been rumored that MS-13 members were used in the alleged Seth Rich’s hit. What a clean, disposable tactic if true. Undocumented, disposable foot-soldier patsies.
There are at least 30,000 children living in orphanages in Haiti. It is a staggering number for a country of 10 million people, but perhaps even more shocking, most of them are not orphans. According to a report an estimated $100-million a year is being donated to orphanages in Haiti by church groups and non-profits, mostly in the United States.
In the worst cases there are cases of child sexual exploitation and human trafficking inside Haiti’s orphanages. It is reported that here too, there is an MS13 connection.
Do you guys ever wonder why the story of Molly Tibbett’s disappearance made such wide spread news when there are thousands of missing people and children happening just about every day? What is it that makes one disappearance stand out in the media above all the others that are happening and never mentioned?
Federal authorities said Rivera provided falsified employment documents and was in the country illegally from Mexico, prompting Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds and President Donald Trump to ridicule what they see as Democrat-led weakness on immigration policies.
But at Mollie’s funeral, father Rob Tibbetts highlighted how “grateful” he was to the Hispanic members of the Iowa community who were incredibly helpful during the search. “The Hispanic community are Iowans. They have the same values as Iowans,” he said, emphasizing family. “As far as I’m concerned, they’re Iowans with better food.”
Sam Lucas, who CNN confirmed as one of Tibbetts’s cousins posted on Twitter; “[H]ey i’m a member of Mollie’s family and we are not so f***ing small-minded that we generalize a whole population based on some bad individuals.”
Usually families of victims show up in support of POTUS after the crimes committed against their loved ones, why is it not the same here?
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
Diane Feinstein hires her Chinese spy driver in or about the year 2000. In 2013, she pushes through legislation to halt gold mining and mineral mining in America. Her husband then became the biggest American importer of Chinese minerals.
The fact that Senator Diane Feinstein’s long-term driver/staff member was, in fact, a spy for the People’s Republic of China has mysteriously disappeared from the news.
So, let me see if I have a good handle on the timeline here:
1. China is given access to Hillary Rodham Clinton’s server, correlating with the death/disappearance of an estimated two dozen CIA assets in China.
Also, China is granted contracts to produce components for American military planes, which have been crashing regularly over the past two years.
(Apparently this is not the first time Senator Feinstein has been associated with suspicious dealings …
2. Diane Feinstein hires her Chinese spy driver in or about the year 2000. In 2013, she pushes through legislation to halt gold mining and mineral mining in America. Her husband then became the biggest American importer of Chinese minerals.
Simultaneously, she pushes through legislation to award $25 billion of taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband a ridiculously lucrative contract to sell foreclosed homes at higher than industry norm prices.
(Source: Washington Times: “On the day the new Congress convened, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband’s real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms.” “Documents reviewed by The Washington Times show Mrs. Feinstein first offered Oct. 30 to help the FDIC secure money for its effort to stem the rise of home foreclosures. Her letter was sent just days before the agency determined that CB Richard Ellis Group (CBRE) – the commercial real estate firm that her husband Richard Blum heads as board chairman – had won the competitive bidding for a contract to sell foreclosed properties that FDIC had inherited from failed banks.”)
3. China has been encouraging its men to marry into African communities, particularly in South Africa. These same countries have suddenly been hit with reparation fever and have begun forcibly stealing land from Boer farmers. Coincidentally, Africa has huge amounts of untapped mineral wealth and little to no regulation on how its mined.
Is may be just me, but has China infiltrated the American government, put the American military at risk by manufacturing faulty parts, cornered the gold and minerals market to potentially try to control our economy, and set in motion a plan for the largest land and resource grab in human history? And were they aided and abetted by treasonous American politicians who got rich by selling out our country?
This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.
