When we establish SPECIAL standards to “protect” specific people based on skin color, gender, religion, etc… we enforce the racism, not address it.
Walmart has jumped on the bandwagon to accommodate the demands of Black Lives Matter. They are not, however, alone in the corporate rush toward political correctness. There are many others in the business world who are rushing to change product names, logos and “reeducate” their employees with enhanced “sensitivity training”.
The content and language will all be very carefully crafted to appear neutral, claim how we ALL must treat each other equally. But just like the civilian world, media, etc, there will be an undertone that it is the white males who are naturally the oppressors/racists.
It will be aimed at them and charged as their duty to capitulate. They will be quietly made to be understand that they are privileged and can’t Possibly understand how those of other colors feel.
It’s divisive and, in its own way, just as racist.
When we teach things like this, we are propagating the division.
When we establish SPECIAL standards to “protect” specific people based on skin color, gender, religion, etc… we enforce the racism, not address it.
But can we ever have a truly honest, open, blunt discussion on how to fix things?
I doubt it. Every time it is attempted it seems to instantly fall into blaming whites. If that can’t be avoided, no worthwhile discussion is to be had. Conversely, if blacks can’t find a way to accept responsibility for their own actions, take some action to improve their lives without handouts and special incentives, nothing will change.
We are a nation where All men are created equal, what we do with that is up to us. If we wallow in a preconceived victim mentality we will squander it. If we continue to work to better ourselves…
We were established to be a nation of liberty based upon laws. It’s safe to say that there were a few issues at the time of founding that needed to be addressed, and they were. But now that the ball is rolling, some would have us continue to attempt to do something nature, life itself, is unable to do.
Welcome to the shit show.
If Blacks continue to generationally insist whites are racist and the cause of their failure, they will ignore that it is actually other blacks who do the most harm to each other and won’t be content until all white people endure life as a slave with them in control.
If Whites continue to grow more guilty generationally despite having established or supported a myriad of things which exclusively promotes and assists blacks only they will continue to come out on the short end.
They foolishly can’t understand why after all their efforts and self loathing, blacks continue to blame them.
A race war? Not likely. Not in the traditional sense of the concept of war.
Yeah, there will be skirmishes, probably a few major battles. But as long as the color of skin is the uniform by which sides are made and lines are drawn, it will never end.
I believe that there is a third party to these issues.
Those who hide behind the curtain have skillfully used peoples of all colors to sow division, hate, anger, despair… they are the tools by which they are able to manipulate us.
Until we are all willing to ignore the color of ones skin we will continue to see these issues. But ignoring skin color is not as we would be led to believe.
Being one color doesn’t make you a victim any more than being an opposite color makes you the evil, privileged one.
We were established to be a nation of liberty based upon laws. It’s safe to say that there were a few issues at the time of founding that needed to be addressed, and they were. But now that the ball is rolling, some would have us continue to attempt to do something nature, life itself, is unable to do.
Force equality.
As Americans we are not promised a successful life, a wealthy, easy, happy existence. We are offered a chance.
We are ALL afforded the liberty from birth to succeed or fail based on our own choices, efforts, and intelligence. What we do with that life is solely up to us. Those who claim otherwise are trying to control you.
white people confronted with their complicity in racism cannot accept it and instead engage in a number of ‘defensive moves’ to avoid the accusation, including disagreeing, staying silent, becoming emotional, and going away.
“How do you navigate conversations with people when the default assumption is that you’re a racist? What do you do when calmly and sincerely stating that you are not a racist is taken as evidence of your guilt of racism?
First, understand what the terms mean, where they come from, and who are the proponents. ‘Anti-racism’ means being against racism, except for one important detail. What anti-racist advocates mean when they use the word ‘racism’ isn’t the same as what most people mean. ‘Anti-racism’ comes directly from the academic scholarship of Critical Race Theory. In Critical Race Theory, ‘racism’ means ‘systemic racism’, which is said to be ‘the ordinary state of affairs’ in the United States. Systemic racism is believed to be the explanation for every disparity in outcomes in which some minority groups, especially blacks, have worse outcomes than whites (or Jews and Asians). The academic definition of ‘anti-racism’ includes ‘working to identify internalized racial dominance if you are White’ or a ‘Person of Color’, ‘joining organizations working for racial justice’, and ‘seeking out continuing education’ in the theory of ‘anti-racism’. It is described as a ‘lifelong commitment to an ongoing process’ that includes social activism to end what it calls ‘racism’, which has an equally peculiar definition.
Robin DiAngelo, a New York Times bestselling scholar of the ‘critical whiteness’ aspect of Critical Race Theory, sees racism in everything. She explains what she calls ‘racism’ this way: ‘the question is not “did racism take place?” but instead “how did racism manifest in this situation?”’ In other words, all situations contain racism, and it is up to the anti-racist activist to uncover it. To do anything else is described as — you guessed it — being a ‘racist’ by upholding ‘racism’.
Second, understand how these ideas are used unfairly against you. The ‘anti-racism’ program offered by Critical Race Theory offers no neutrality. Everyone is either an ‘anti-racist’ or they are ‘racists’ by default. The lines of literature in which DiAngelo situates her claims clearly state that there is no such thing as being not-racist, and she repeatedly asserts that neutrality on this issue means favoring ‘racism’. Not even progressives are safe. DiAngelo writes, ‘white progressives cause the most daily damage to people of color. I define a white progressive as any white person who thinks he or she is not racist, or is less racist.’
This false dichotomy is central to the ‘anti-racism’ narrative currently being forwarded, especially by other New York Times bestselling authors like Ijeoma Oluo, Layla F. Saad, and Ibram X. Kendi, whose books are currently dominating the bestseller lists. Put bluntly, the only option these activist-scholars offer is to join their movement or accept being a ‘racist’.
Anti-racism is defended further with another hot buzzword: ‘white fragility’. DiAngelo created this idea and describes it as a state of ‘racial stress’ that white people find intolerable when confronted with the fact of their ‘complicity’ in ‘racism’ and ‘white supremacy’. She claims white complicity is an automatic result of receiving the benefits of white privilege, which all white people necessarily have. She, being a white woman, then names her personal goal not as overcoming racism, which would be impossible (she writes that it is not possible to construct a ‘positive white identity’), but as progressively becoming ‘less white’.
DiAngelo further asserts that white people confronted with their complicity in racism cannot accept it and instead engage in a number of ‘defensive moves’ to avoid the accusation, including disagreeing, staying silent, becoming emotional, and going away. These ‘maneuvers’ expose their white fragility. ‘White fragility’ is therefore a charge that cannot be denied and thus separates all white people into two categories: racists (who admit it) and racists (who are too fragile) to admit it.
Third, agree that racism is horrific. This is obvious, so it’s easy.
Fourth, calmly expose and explain the bait-and-switch definitions. An identical argument could be made about literally any position: there are two types of people — Trump supporters who admit it and Trump supporters who are too afraid to admit it; those who claim they don’t like pancakes and those who are too deceitful to tell the truth that pancakes are awful; witches who confess and witches who are too in league with the devil to admit it. If white fragility is a real phenomenon, it needs a better litmus test than this.”
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit.
~A great history lesson..DID YOU KNOW…this is the information erased from our kids history books! Definitely worth your time to read~
The Irish slave trade began when 30,000 Irish prisoners were sold as slaves to the New World. The King James I Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.
Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.
From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.
During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.
Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.
As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit.
Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.
In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.
There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry.
In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.
But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong. Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.
The word “nation” in Greek is ethnos (eth’-nos). It means race, or tribe.
Luke 11:17
Because Jesusknew what they were thinking, he said to them, “Every kingdom involved in civil war becomes a wasteland, and a house torn apart by divisions will collapse.
Three times in scripture, Jesus speaks about wars and such and what things must happen before He calls God’s children home. This morning, though, a particular phrase stuck in my head and it appears three times: nation shall rise against nation. Mat. 24:7, Mark 13:8, and Luke 21:10 all say the same exact thing = For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. Focus on the words “nation” and “kingdom.”
The word “nation” in Greek is ethnos (eth’-nos). It means race, or tribe. This scripture has been read for years and described by many pulpiteers as the conflicts between the USA and Russia, or USA and China, or USA and Iran/Iraq or any other combination of other land masses (nations) against other land masses (nations).
Jesus did speak of wars and rumor of wars which would be between land masses (nations). But this part, “…nation shall rise against nation…” specifically means that races (people of EVERY color, EVERY skin tone) will begin to start coming against one another and tearing each other down.
Jesus knows today, just as He did when He walked this earth, that nations (land masses) would have different “ethnos” (nations, races) on every one of them. If you read this any other way and claim I am racist, then you better look into my life. I have a “mixed” stepson with 3 different “ethnos” in his blood.
I am trying to bring clarification to something: “ethnos” is destroying our cities, our states, and our nation. If you are saved, your are not a “white” Christian, nor a “black” Christian, nor a “brown” Christian, and on and on. You are a CHRISTIAN. But, even when surveys are taken, no matter the subject, the surveyor breaks down the main topic into “FOR AND AGAINST” (example) but then goes on to break it down into “ethnos” voted this way, “age” voted this way, etc.
Christ then says, “…kingdom against kingdom…” In Greek the word is basileia (bas-il-i’-ah). This means royalty, rulers, and realms. Can we not see with our eyes that we have not only been divided by nation (ethnos – race) but also broken into financial classes. There is the upper – upper class. Upper class. Upper-middle. Middle. Upper-lower. Lower. And what is crazy each “kingdom” (class) only votes for those who will do their “kingdom” (class) any good.
Every political speech is filled with “kingdom issues” (ex = I will work for the middle class and blah blah blah. (insert whatever class)). Politicians also use words such as, “I will work for this “ethnos” and that “ethnos.” No wonder America is falling apart. BOTH PARTIES are chocked full of liars but yet we still allow them to speak to our “ethnos and basileia” (race and class) instead of speaking to us as humans, as equals, as children created by an amazing God.
Christ spoke to all and never gave a “speech” where race or class was involved. He spoke to all. He died for all. He intercedes for all. His blood covers all. His stripes heal all. He saves all. He delivers all. HE LOVES ALL.
In closing, HE said this also, in Luke 11:17 = EVERY kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and a house against a house falls. BUT, even, notice the next verse, 18, = If Satan also be divided against himself, how shall his kingdom stand..?” It’s amazing that Satan is smart enough to realize the power of unity. He gets it but there are some of us in America who don’t.
Let’s quit being “ethnos” (colors), quit being “basileia” (classes), quit being denominations, quit being religious. The enemy loves when we are divided. Psalms 133:1-3 = How beautiful and how pleasant it is for brethren (all colors, all classes) to dwell together in unity. It is like precious ointment…for there (unity) the LORD commanded the blessing, even life for evermore.
Around this time we celebrate Father’s Day. But fathers in our culture have not recently appeared very important—at least according to Hollywood and other culture-shapers.
Much of the mayhem we see today is linked to fatherlessness.
Around this time we celebrate Father’s Day. But fathers in our culture have not recently appeared very important—at least according to Hollywood and other culture-shapers.
If you need housing or any other public assistance, the rule is that the father can not be in the home. THIS is what real systemic victimization that disproportionately impacts minorities looks like. The government is a leading cause of broken families.
Did you know that almost every person Senator Joe McCarthy named as a communist in public … was ACTUALLY a Soviet agent?
It isn’t surprising that Black Lives Matter is a communist organization—but the type of communism they subscribe to is. They are conservative communists attempting to fold the progressive movement back into traditional Marxism.
BLM has turned its back on intersectional theory, the modern conflict theory that birthed safe spaces, trigger warnings, and the Oppression Olympics. Instead, BLM is rebirthing the traditional class struggle, reframing it in terms of black and white.
Did you know that almost every person Senator Joe McCarthy named as a communist in public … was ACTUALLY a Soviet agent?
Making the above statements likely will get you labeled as the new Joe McCarthy. Accused of creating a bogus Red Scare and smearing countless innocent victims in a five-year reign of terror, Senator Joseph McCarthy is universally remembered as a demagogue, a bully, and a liar. History has judged him such a loathsome figure that even today, a half century after his death, his name remains synonymous with witch hunts. But that conventional image is all wrong.
It all began with a February 9, 1950 speech in Wheeling, West Virginia (which was not recorded,. Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin was discussing the level to which our government had been infiltrated by communists and reportedly said that he had “here in my hand a list of 205 [active members of the Communist Party and members of a spy ring] that were made known to the Secretary of State . . . and who nevertheless are still working for and shaping policy in the State Department.”
These were names already provided to the House Appropriations Committee whose cases were still pending. That’s where the confusion came in: he then cross-referenced that list with another one of 284 security risks given him (of whom 79 had already been dismissed) for 205 names and 57 still employed.
Historians have obsessed with the different numbers, but a surviving copy of his speech that day show that he has “205″ crossed out and “57″ written in, and he said only 57 were still in government.
Of course, the press ran with the bigger number, saying “State Department has 205 Commies.”
As noted in another “Wild moment,” the most important Soviet spy was not in the State Department, but in the Treasury Department, where the assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Harry Dexter White, was a full-fledged Soviet agent. He was aided there by Solomon Adler, Frank Coe, and Harold Glasser (whom he personally recruited). And in the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, there was Alger Hiss. Even FBI director J. Edgar Hoover estimated there were 200-400 active Soviet spies in the US. McCarthy just thought most of them were in government.
If anything, though, McCarthy underestimated the degree of penetration in the Roosevelt/Truman administrations: Laurence Duggan at Treasury, Michael Straight at State, John Abt at Justice. One of McCarthy’s supposed “victims,” Owen Lattimore, who was editor of Pacific Affairs, was specifically named by McCarthy as one who behaved like a Soviet agent—but McCarthy never actually named him. On the very day the Tydings Committee announced that the U.S. government was “free of Communist infiltration,” Julius Rosenberg was arrested for espionage.
In fact, McCarthy’s “names” included Gustavo Duran, Mary Jane Keeney, Edward Posniak, John Carter Vincent, and Lattimore, and a 1954 article revealed that every security or loyalty risk McCarthy brought forward had either resigned or been dismissed from government. Other Soviet operatives that McCarthy named were T. A. Bisson, Cedric Belfrage, Leonard Mins, and William Remington. If anything, McCarthy was too late. By the time he identified them, the FBI had been watching them for years—yet they retained their jobs.
The “205″ number remains a bogey man to this day, and M. Stanton Evans’ book, Blacklisted by History shows that none of the three living witnesses to the speech remembered McCarthy saying there were 205 communists in government, but rather 205 suspects and “55″or “57″ including a note by one woman who wrote down “205″ then “57cc.” Newspapers the next day used the “57″ number or “over 50.”
All of this mattered for two reasons.
One, some of these people engaged in espionage for the Soviet Union.
Two, they manipulated U.S. foreign policy to the benefit of the communists. More than 50 years later, the betrayal continues under the tutelage of Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Shumer and their minions . But Senator Joe McCarthy tried to prevent it.
This media influence is a Clear and Present danger which is FAR worse that Cover 19 because the only cure for it is self education, which many progressive and younger people adamantly refuse to do.
For many of us long time cynics, Covid 19 is not a true SHTF scenario, but simply a good rehearsal for one. All the frantic, store binging activity is just as we thought the early stages of SHTF would be. This is a good thing as it points out to us weak spots in our preps.
Having said the above, look at Covid 19 through the Bambi-like eyes of the unprepared. No TP in the stores is not an inconvenience, it’s the end of the world. When other staples started going away, it just reinforced their belief the end was here.
I believe that there was never a need for mass hysteria, total lock down, or the attempted destruction of our economy, good cleaning and hygiene habits, masks, and social distancing could well have taken care of this.
We didn’t stop with that because first, the Progressive leadership is desperately trying to bring Trump down and did their level best to make the situation as bad as they could.
Secondly, and more importantly because it describes a major danger to us all, and that is the media. For the same purposes as the Progressives, they whipped up a fear of dying, that I’ve not seen in my lifetime (I’m old!).
Coupled with this last point, we have a generation of Millennials that had fear rubbed in their nose, the fact that they might die someday and they weren’t ready for it. They expected to live forever, bad things would never happen to them, and life is fair.
Suddenly, bad things COULD happen to them, they weren’t going to live forever, and life is not fair and can be very hard.
We should all be aware that this fear mongering is the real issue here, not the flu. The next time they do this, it really could tip us over past the ability to recover.
This media influence is a Clear and Present danger which is FAR worse that Cover 19 because the only cure for it is self education, which many progressive and younger people adamantly refuse to do.
As a Pandemic, Covid 19 only registers 3rd or 4th from the bottom of history’s plagues.
Indeed, many of us lived through the Hong Cong Flu, which killed 1-4 million people around the world from 1956 to 1958- I remember it, but there was no panic or hysteria involved; the Swine flu in 2009, which killed 200K people – no panic then; and the annual flu which we have vaccines for kills over 60,000 per year- every year – neither of these get any special attention by the media or the progressives. Smallpox was the worst, killing 300 to 500 MILLION people the first 75 years of the 20 century.
Still, the media continues to beat the drum over covid 19 and, for the past weeks over the George Floyd case and the attendant riots.
This is not new. A quote here would be appropriate; “The media’s the most powerful entity on Earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of the masses.”
You might think that quote was from Donald J Trump. You would be wrong. It was said by Malcolm X.
the more people continue to point out factors that separate us as human beings the less likely people are to quit using race as a crutch or as a way to be degrading.
June is being celebrated as LBGTQ?Pride month. February has been designated as the month to celebrate “Black Pride”. It seems that every subset of humanity has a demand for a tribal exercise of superiority signalling.
In a sense, I get it.
But if pride is ever justified, race is one of the least valid reasons. It’s at the bottom of the list.
At the top is what you’ve actually done. You can be justly proud of how you’ve lived your life. The way you’ve shown your character. What you’ve accomplished. How you’ve raised your children. And especially, how you’ve treated other people.
All else are things that are accidents of birth. These all have tribalist implications.
It’s fine to be proud of your family, when you’ve had good parents, who’ve encouraged and supported you. But pride in distant relatives who may have distinguished themselves in some way is much less valid.
Below that, I’d put national pride. I suppose it’s OK, but you had no choice in it, and it’s too easy to get carried away. And to me, it would be much more justified depending on what you’ve contributed to your country and your fellow citizens.
And lowest on the list are purely biological characteristics that are functions of your lifestyle and DNA. Like your race or your sexual orientation.
Is it really rational for me to be proud I’m a white guy? I know it’s part of who I am, but it happened because of a random reproductive event. It’s nothing I did, and nothing over which I have any control.
I’ve never understood “pride” in something you didn’t accomplish, like gay pride, for example.
Having a specific identity around being a minority seems to do more harm than good. The same goes for black or racial pride. Being obsessed with your “blackness” just seems obsessive and invites a microcosm.
As I see it, being proud of my race or sexual orientation makes as much sense as being proud of my blood type.
If we’re going to have “pride” in things we did not accomplish, why not male or female pride? Or for things we chose, why not Christian or Muslim or atheist pride? These concepts don’t really exist, but it may have to do with the fact that there are too many people under each label that by being one of these things you’re “not special enough”.
I believe racial pride is both stupid and pointless. There’s nothing wrong with being educated on your culture or history and no one should feel ashamed of their race.
But I believe that at the same time, one persons accomplishment(s) are not those of an entire race. No one should be ashamed of their race because it’s a fact of life and something that shouldn’t even be a problem, but the more people continue to point out factors that separate us as human beings the less likely people are to quit using race as a crutch or as a way to be degrading.
I understand celebrating your culture and traditions, but for some reason it seems like the same people going around talking about Latino pride, Black pride, Asian pride and White pride are the same people who go around saying their race is so oppressed in society and that they feel discriminated against.
Proverbs 11:2 – [When] pride cometh, then cometh shame: but with the lowly [is] wisdom.
It is interesting. If you consider that El Nuevo Rodeo might likely be a front for a three letter national security agency; or at the very least a valuable inside source for domestic intelligence and surveillance,
Things are seldom as they seem. Skim milk masquerades as cream.
Everything around El Nuevo Rodeo, the Mexican Cantina and Dance Club where George and Derek worked, is sketchy.
El Nuevo Rodeo (hereafter ENR) is a front business. Nothing is as it seems.
The background ownership of ENR takes you to a shady network of LLC’s and the name Omar Investments Inc. (est. 1996). Dig a little deeper and something else becomes evident… The ownership might connect to one or more U.S. three letter agencies.
The ownership network has previous interactions with FBI operations in/around Minneapolis. This is not surprising because Minneapolis Minnesota has more national security operations ongoing than any other community in the country. Various Somali groups are being watched, and anyone can do a google search to see when those security operations surface in the media.
Omar Investments Inc. owns El Nuevo Rodeo Cantina and night club since 1996. The principle of Omar Investments Inc. is Muna Sabri, (an alleged classmate of Ann Dunham). In 2001 a close relative, Basim Sabri, was captured by the FBI in a sting operation.
…”In 2001, FBI agents recorded Sabri giving Herron $5,000, cash intended to curry the lawmaker’s support for his development. Sabri was later convicted on three bribery counts and fined $75,000.” (link)….
FBI intercept in 2001, there’s the capture. That’s the asset creation point for U.S. security to find a way to embed within Minneapolis, and assist the Sabri’s along the way.
The presented “former club owner”, Maya Santamaria, seen on television, appears to be a purposeful ‘front’ (a face useful in deflecting attention from the primary owner and operations). With that in mind, the scale of false information in/around the visible event, horrible as it was/is, creates layers and layers of purposeful misinformation and a need to control what the public sees in the media.
It is interesting. If you consider that El Nuevo Rodeo might likely be a front for a three letter national security agency; or at the very least a valuable inside source for domestic intelligence and surveillance, things start reconciling rather quickly.
ENR also looks like a money laundering operation. Part of that laundry operation appears to involve counterfeit currency. This enterprise, writ large, looks like the answer to ‘how’ a U.S. agency infiltrated the background criminal network in Minnesota to watch and monitor for domestic threats. So there are layers to what is visible and a myriad of interests involved.
Officer Derek Chauvin is a 19-year veteran of the Mineapolis police dept. Derek Chauvin also worked at ENR for 17 years. That timeline puts Derek Chauvin showing up to work security at El Neuvo Rodeo cantina and club right after the FBI busts Basim Sabri (everyone remembers what intel agencies were doing right after 9-11-01).
Recently – When the Wuhan Virus hits the night club needs to shut down. By extension this shuts down any illicit activity maintained by the legit operation. Any activity within a laundering operation would have to be paused. It would look silly, very suspicious, if the ENR club bookkeeper was making bank deposits while the business is closed.
However, this also means George Floyd was out of work.
The police were called because George Floyd was passing counterfeit $20 bills.
Could the way Chauvin, and the responders writ large, interacted with George Floyd have been an outcropping of concern that Floyd was putting the ENR operation at risk?
Read the indictment. Everything was cool until the responding officers attempted to put Floyd in Derek Chauvin’s squad car. Floyd is presented as being ok with the arrest stuff; but really, really, didn’t want to get in Derek’s car.
17-years as a “security officer” for El Nuevo Rodeo. Was Chauvin the enforcer?
Does that explain why everyone seems casual, even the responding EMT’s?
Could the national security angle explain why no prior charges against Chauvin in a 2006 shooting were ever sought?
One thing is clear, as attested by Benjamin Crump, Derek Chauvin and George Floyd knew each-other; this was not some random street incident. Arguably, every single person in/around law enforcement and EMT response that day knew each-other.
Who would go through a cost-prohibitive process to counterfeit $1 dollar bills?
A U.S. national security agency conducting an operation with little interest in the profit dynamic; that’s who.
Review the George Floyd “murder” video again, but before you do, look up the https://7-s3.com/
During the “protests” the club was burnt to the ground.
During the “protests” the police precinct housing the evidence was burnt to the ground.
The mayor of Minneapolis ordered the police and fire departments to stand down and allow the police precinct to burn to the ground, destroying all the evidence.
A manufacturing company, 7 Sigma has informed Minneapolis that they will be moving their operations.
7 Sigma manufactured very realistic looking medical dummies for medical training exercises. We have seen what looked like medical dummies in the early covid hospital bed scenes breathlessly broadcast by MSM when they were claiming the hospitals were full of covid patients. Were they 7 Sigma dummies? If so, what a “coincidence” all that evidence burned in a fire.
