The question of will there be a coup is more a question of how broadly the word coup is defined. There is no question that the liberal cult is literally waging war on America, and it is clear that their war efforts have increased exponentially since the election of Trump; the only question is whether what they do fits the definition of a coup.
There has been much talk on the right side of the political spectrum regarding an ongoing coup attempt by the Democrats and their Deep State handlers against the presidency of Donald J Trump.
The liberal cult has long been waging very real political war against America, while loyal Americans have tried to defend our country from this assault using legitimate politics. Since those who cheat often win, the liberal cult has had much success.
The exception to cheaters winning is when they get caught cheating and thrown out of the game. The cheating of the liberal cult has grown so outrageous that this might indeed happen. If it does, there will likely be much violence involved in the process of throwing the cheaters out.
The question of will there be a coup is more a question of how broadly the word coup is defined. There is no question that the liberal cult is literally waging war on America, and it is clear that their war efforts have increased exponentially since the election of Trump; the only question is whether what they do fits the definition of a coup.
It does fit any realistic definition of treason though, and that’s all that matters.
As far as the future after a presumed Trump victory (God willing), I do not expect the liberal cult to accept the results.
I expect liberal political war operatives to discover masses of ballots that somehow failed to get counted, all in states that were close, and most of the ballots will be for Biden. As the Socialist Democrats have become emboldened by the sadly lacking actions against them to this point, something like that will be done, with little or no attempt to legitimatize this bold theft .
Even a Biden political victory can be called a coup in a broad sense of the word coup, because it will have been political war activity and not legitimate politics that gave him his victory.
“So this is how liberty dies…with thunderous applause.” – Senator Padme’ Amidala, Star Wars Episode III
we have reached a point that the Founders anticipated. They could not imagine men in sundresses shrieking like lunatics about white privilege, but they knew that unrestrained factionalism led to conflict.
The great concern of the American Founders was that factionalism would result in irreconcilable differences. In Federalist 10, Madison argued against direct democracy, because it inevitably leads to factionalism. People have different interests due to differences in opinion, wealth and status. Naturally, the like-minded join together in factions to advance their interests, even at the expense of the community. The remedy was the representative structure in the proposed constitution.
In a big diverse country like America, there are very few things a large majority of the people will agree upon. There are the big things like individual rights and equality before the law, but most issues will only be supported by a plurality. If most people don’t care, then the plurality gets their way. If not, then the plurality is out of luck. The important thing is that there is general agreement on the big stuff and a willingness to ignore the small items or leave people to sort them on their own.
That was the point of the representative structure they devised. On the one hand, it prevented the fifty percent plus one from imposing its will on the rest. Tyranny of the majority is still tyranny. The system was designed to compel compromise among the factions that would inevitably form up. On the other hand, it delegated much of what mattered to people in their politics down to the states. This was to prevent one region from imposing its will on the rest.
The system did not last very long. Lincoln obliterated that old structure and created a new country dominated by the North, which explicitly wished to impose its morality on the rest of the country. Starting in the early 20th century, the ruling faction has been growing the power of the national government, at the expense of state government, in order to impose its will on the rest of the country. The full flowering of liberal democracy is minority rule, where a tiny group control everything.
This is exactly the sort of problem the Founders wished to avoid. By sharply limiting the power of the national government, it could never be a weapon used by one faction against the rest of the country. It would also prevent the formation of partisan schisms, where the two sides are defined by their opposition to the other. The new system would make it “more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried.”
By “vicious arts” Madison meant the playing of one faction against another, in order to generate enthusiasm from one versus the other. The Founders understood that democracy always led to tyranny or anarchy. The antidote was republicanism, where individual or group interests were sublimated to the good of the whole, even when the individuals involved lacked the natural republican virtue. If Madison were alive today, he would recognize the pit into which we have fallen.
There are libraries full of books on how and why we quickly abandoned the system the Founders created. First it was the Civil War when the North conquered the rest of the country by force of arms. Then it was the slow dismantling of the federal system to create the system we today call liberal democracy. There will be libraries of books written on whatever comes next, assuming that what comes next is not a dark age. We are a long way from the original vision and we shall never return.
What is not discussed very often is how this evolution has arrived at a point where a significant portion of the people no longer accept reality. The partisanship and factionalism have reached a point where one faction is no longer able to agree with the other on basic points of reality. You see this in this post by a far-left activist working for the New York Times. The point of the post is to demonstrate that he will reject anything his enemy says, even when it is obvious fact.
Here we have the CDC posting updated information on the coronavirus that people with knowledge of how these things work suspected all along. The death counts were overblown, because the system was designed to do it. At some point the numbers get adjusted back to something closer to reality. In this case, the adjustment is newsworthy because it is so extreme. Still, it is a real thing, but the partisans cannot accept it, because they think it is supporting their enemies.
The same is true about the rioting this summer. You can go on-line and see people looting, fighting, burning and destroying things. Despite the thousands of hours of video on-line, the partisans demand we pretend they are peaceful outbursts over something they insist is true, despite the lack of evidence. When people they assume support Trump, their most supreme enemy, point out that these rioters are being underwritten and supported, they call it a conspiracy theory.
What makes this even more insane is the person who wrote that post, like the others in his ideological faction, spent years telling us invisible men with Slavic accents used mind control to alter the last election. They insisted that while the Biden family regularly takes bribes from foreign governments, noticing this is part of a conspiracy to undermine the democracy. These people not only oppose everything their enemies say, they create wild fantasies to justify their opposition.
Even though they did not use the word partisan in the modern sense, the Founders understood that groups of like-minded people could disagree with one another to the point where they could find no comprise. Their system was designed to force compromise, by preventing any one group from having complete power over the rest and thus imposing their will. That is the whole point of federalism and the separation of powers in the national government.
The Founders could not imagine partisanship in the modern Marxist sense, where the factions are defined in opposition to one another. Peter Baker, the writer of the New York Times post, is not able to think on his own. His partisan fervor now leads him to take the opposite of whatever he imagines his enemies are saying. If Trump says it is raining, then Mr. Baker will claim that his enemies have created a conspiracy theory where water falls from the sky.
If Mr. Baker were a lone lunatic, he could be dismissed, but he is representative of the ruling class. He is one of their paid spokesmen. How is it possible for normal people to reach a compromise with people who are defined by their unwillingness to reach any compromise with us? Who they are is defined by not agreeing with us on even the basic bits of observable reality. When a reporter is stationed in front of burning building and told to call it a peaceful protest, where’s the middle ground there?
We have reached a point where the ruling class is at war with reality. Part of that reality is they are a ruling class with certain duties and responsibilities. They reject that solely on the grounds that the people they rule over define a ruling class as having certain duties and responsibilities. This is why they celebrate the anarchists burning cities and murdering citizens. They oppose Trump, because he rhetorically represents the rest of us and they are the forever enemy of us.
There appears to be only two options at this stage. Either the ruling class abandons its war on the rest of us or the rest of us accept that we are at war. The former requires the ruling class to break free of the partisan madness that now grips them. This is something without precedent, but we live in an unprecedented time. The other option simply reacquires time. At some point, necessity will require people to accept reality and act accordingly. The rest is predictable.
Either way, we have reached a point that the Founders anticipated. They could not imagine men in sundresses shrieking like lunatics about white privilege, but they knew that unrestrained factionalism led to conflict. They knew that irreconcilable differences could only lead to one thing. That is where we find ourselves. Normal society is now at odds with the people that rule over it. Either the people in charge come to their senses or the people will have no choice but to remove them.
Interesting in light of what has happened in the wake of both the Democrat and Republican conventions, don’t you think?
An enemy will tell you not only their intent but what they fear, given time. A Bernie Bro by the name of Kyle Jurek was captured on film stating:
“Germany had to spend billions of dollars re-educating their f***ing people to not be Nazis,” he continues. “We’re probably going to have to do the same f***ing thing here.”
“That’s kind of what all Bernie’s whole f***ing like, ‘hey, free education for everybody’ because we’re going to have to teach you to not be a f***ing Nazi,” he added.
In another part of the video, Jurek is seen discussing Soviet Union dictator Joseph Stalin’s use of gulags, where he claims that the CIA was overly critical of them. “People were actually paid a living wage in the gulags. They have conjugal visits in gulags. Gulags were meant for re-education,” he says.
This is quite similar to what William Ayers described as necessary in the meetings of the Weather Underground. And to the detractors and apologists who defend this excrement, I can assure you that this is exactly what a large majority of them think. You Boomers who believe there’s a peaceful resolution to any of this? They want you gone first.
And what will happen if Bernie doesn’t get the nod this time around?
…Jurek warning that Milwaukee, host of this year’s Democratic National Convention, will “burn” if Sanders fails to win the party’s nomination. “If Bernie doesn’t get the nomination or it goes to a second round at the DNC convention, f***ing Milwaukee will burn,” says Jurek. “It’ll start in Milwaukee and then when the police push back on that, other sites will f***ing [explode].”
Interesting in light of what has happened in the wake of both the Democrat and Republican conventions, don’t you think?
Mask mandates are not laws, by the way. When private businesses refuse services to individuals based on the individual’s private medical decisions and personal beliefs, the business and their employees are the ones violating established civil rights laws, which are established in every state.
Populations are being psychologically manipulated, primed to take vaccines in order to regain their freedom
As mortality rates appeared grim, with controversial testing kits, false positives and misleading diagnoses, people around the world were told to “stay home, stay safe.” As small businesses closed their doors and corporate profits soared, uninfected people distanced themselves from other uninfected people. The stage was set. The terms were written. Getting cell mediated immunity to a new infection was forbidden. Every surface, touch and breath was to be avoided and feared into perpetuity. There was a blackout on information that could help the human immune response. Antiviral treatments were blocked and ridiculed. Fear had become a virtue, and germaphobia became an unstoppable doctrine, weaving its decrepit philosophies and fearful controls into every aspect of society.
As time went on, governments and corporations imposed “mask mandates” to “keep you healthy.” The facial covering is now a form of obedience training and compliance conditioning that has become a placeholder for future vaccine mandates.
Mask mandates are not laws, by the way. When private businesses refuse services to individuals based on the individual’s private medical decisions and personal beliefs, the business and their employees are the ones violating established civil rights laws, which are established in every state. But the law no longer matters as long as Americans go along with their compliance conditioning until a new set of vaccines are available for injection. Presidential candidate Joe Biden has flouted the idea of locking down the country in 2021 and imposing an indefinite federal mask mandate – a prelude to mandatory injections for all.
Dr. Anthony Fauci promises these vaccines will be ready in 18 months, approved by an FDA that already admitted that these experimental injections will be unleashed even though they lack safety and only generate 50 percent efficacy for a short amount of time.
Developing a vaccine is a process that takes an average of 10.6 years, and only a small amount of vaccine experiments (23 percent) ever make it to market in that time. Even these “FDA-approved” inoculations come with their own set of risks which include lifelong debilitation and death. Vaccine injuries are commonly reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System every day. Because there are not enough funds set aside to cover all the vaccine injuries, the Special Master of the vaccine court only approves select injuries for compensation that meet a strict set of criteria (that excludes most of the adverse events included on the vaccine manufacturer’s insert sheet.)
This hasn’t stopped vaccine financier Bill Gates from promoting an experimental set of injections for every human being on the planet, rolled out in as little as 18 months, from companies that are indemnified from legal repercussions when their vaccines harm people.
This vaccine coercion continues even as convalescent plasma and anti-viral medicines become more readily available, lowering the mortality rate. As the survival rate improves and community spread dissipates, one must ask if the current situation should be declared a pandemic at all, or if populations are dealing with a virus that is now endemic, with rapid host adaptation occurring and questionable false positive test results. The economic, behavioral, and personal liberty controls pose a greater threat to humanity than a select pathogen, and are still being used against people coercing populations to submit to experimental injections.
…if someone burgles your house in the middle of the night. In that situation you don’t know whether they’re armed or not. You don’t have to wait for them to attack you before you respond. You’re entitled to strike first with whatever weapon comes to hand.
This is going to be blunt. In the coming weeks and months, the sheer volume of propaganda bullshit that’s going to be crafted and aimed at you by fake news over the shootings in Kenosha will seem almost overwhelming, but there are some fundamentals of law you should not lose sight of.
First off, every person has the right to defend themselves from anybody. That’s why the second amendment, the right to bear arms, was added to the Bill of Rights by James Madison and others. His thinking was once you have a standing army, it can be used by an unscrupulous government trampling over the Constitution to intimidate and suppress its citizens. Harry Truman fired Gen. Douglas MacArthur because MacArthur started to believe he was above civilian control, and that’s the start of a slippery slope that always leads to military dictatorships.
With the far-left fake news propaganda machine always rushing by reflex to the criminal’s defense and organizing a media lynch mob for anyone defending themselves, the situation reached such a point of confusion in a Florida county that the top cop sent a letter to all householders in it outlining your legal position if someone burgles your house in the middle of the night. In that situation you don’t know whether they’re armed or not. You don’t have to wait for them to attack you before you respond. You’re entitled to strike first with whatever weapon comes to hand.
When you’ve rendered them injured or unconscious, you call the police. What you’re not entitled to do is continue shooting or clubbing them when they’re helpless and no longer constitute a risk because that’s when you can be charged with assault or even murder. Put simply, if you’ve just put a bullet hole in a person and they’re down, you can’t just finish them off with a double tap to the head.
The same rules apply to a police officer who discharges his gun in the course of their duty. If he believes the subject constitutes an immediate danger to them or other people, he’s entitled to shoot. The emphasis is on believe. In the aftermath, the officer is put on administrative duties until Internal Affairs or its local equivalent have investigated the shooting and determined whether it was a good shooting or not. It’s not at all uncommon for a policeman to serve his twenty-five all the way to retirement without ever having to shoot his service pistol.
In Kenosha, a young man called Kyle Rittenhouse was running for his life pursued by a screaming mob. He trips and falls over and rolls over onto his back on the road. One of the gang dips in to stamp on him followed by another who hits him over the head with a skateboard.
The mob starts to close in on him, with one reaching down to grab him. I’m sure the footage that was shown last week flashed through his head of a man and his wife being dragged from their car by a mob, both being beaten up and the man nearly kicked to death when he’d already been rendered unconscious. He was in the exact same situation and had just grounds to believe his life was in immediate danger. He drew his sidearm and shot the man reaching down for him while the rest of the mob either fled or backed off with their hands up. He put a few rounds over their heads to discourage them following him while he walked towards the police line to surrender himself.
Looked at in isolation, that was a good shooting in anyone’s book.
What I find suspicious about the footage that emerged within a very short time after the incident is that it appears to be highly selective. Any flare up or incident while the Dem rioters have someone surrounded is always captured on multiple video phones, and yet in this case all you get to see is the pack chasing the victim. The same selectivity is apparent with video coverage of the man who was wounded in the arm. It shows him receiving first aid but the bit that was edited out can be seen in this picture which was taken before the video was shot.
He’s holding a Glock automatic, so it looks like he was the loser in whatever gunfight occurred. The fact that he’s still holding it after being shot indicates he’s suffered nerve damage leaving him unable to release his grip of it. What’s suspicious is that by the next time you see him being attended to, the Glock has mysteriously disappeared. Shooting an unarmed Democrat rioter plays a lot better to the fake news propaganda machine, so the next time you see that picture, the Glock will most probably have been cropped or photo shopped out of the picture.
Kyle Rittenhouse has since been charged with murder – within 24 hours – which is amazingly quick and definitely smacks of a political sop being thrown to the media and the various lynch mobs after him. His trial, if it ever comes to that, will last for months, but I suspect all it’ll do is raise him to the hero status people like Nick Sandman and the McCloskey couple currently enjoy. The hang him high commentary I fully expect from fake news may, like in Sandman’s case, prove good grounds to sue the ass off them once again.
Addendum:
Here’s something interesting:
Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a 1) gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a 2) gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a 3) gunshot wound to the left hand, a
4) superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a 5)graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.
My comment: That’s interesting, because Kyle was in front. How’d Rosenbaum get shot in the back? Let alone the rest of it looks dubious, I doubt a .223 would merely graze and there’s no such thing as “superficial” with that round, the “superficial” hit to the thigh was likely from a hand gun.
To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior
You WILL comply!
1984 was apparently an operations manual and not a fictional novel.
Liberal professor wants “morality pills” to be laced into water supplies to make people wear masks, socially distance
In order to force compliance among those who are resisting wearing a mask and socially distancing, Prof. Parker Crutchfield, a “bioethicist” from Western Michigan University, is calling for water supplies all across the nation to be laced with “morality pills.”
Those “deplorables” who are rejecting the narrative that staying away from people and covering the mouth and nose with cloth is somehow helping to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) need to be forcibly drugged in order to “convert” them into believers, according to Crutchfield.
A user of morality pills himself, Crutchfield believes that achieving total compliance is as easy as altering people’s brain chemistry with pharmaceuticals – and doing it covertly without people even knowing it.
“To me, it seems the problem of coronavirus defectors could be solved by moral enhancement: like receiving a vaccine to beef up your immune system, people could take a substance to boost their cooperative, pro-social behavior,” Crutchfield is quoted as saying.
Though Crutchfield admits that the idea represents a “far-out proposal that’s bound to be controversial,” he believes it to be the most appropriate next-step for getting everyone on board with the pro-mask, pro-distancing plandemic agenda.
So-called “moral enhancement,” he contends, can be made “compulsory” simply by “administer[ing] it secretly, perhaps via the water supply.” He recently published a thesis in the Conversation, “a news site focusing on content ‘sourced from the academic and research community’ and supported by universities from around the world towards this end.”
Day after day, and hour after hour we were bombarded by oftentimes conflicting information from the “experts”. It must be true, we thought, after all this information is being given to us by experts versed in the “settled science”.
The media is a very powerful and useful tool and we lean on it every day and making our opinions and decisions.
I belong to a generation that once to believed, “if it was not in the newspaper or on TV it did not happen.” Today there is a dizzying number of choices in media, but in essence, it comes down to the fact that if it’s nicely packaged and repeated enough times, most of the folks are gonna believe it.
Because of the speed of our modern life, we want our information very fast and accurate, with the accent on fast. We want “flashy” and useful, but the accent is once again on flashy.
There are many choices, sources, and opinions on how we get information and from what media – but still, not many things have changed. We humans are still very easy to manipulate with and through the media.
The ways that people get manipulated through the media/information probably hasn’t changed for ages, it simply got more “sophisticated”, and we, the people, got more “plugged in” or simply more dependent on it.
As I look back, with my eyes open, it is very easy to see how we have been fooled by most of the media and pushed into actions that were not smart. But at that time, the manipulation was invisible to us. The media has and continues to manipulate people, bombarding us with fear and hate.
Take the case of the “virus”. We were bombarded constantly with loads of information about changes that were coming at us.
It was not only about the political system and the medical system. We were also consistently reassured about the importance of our opinions. After a period of time folks simply started to believe that our opinions could make change, or that our opinions were important.
Day after day, and hour after hour we were bombarded by oftentimes conflicting information from the “experts”. It must be true, we thought, after all this information is being given to us by experts versed in the “settled science”. 1st we were told that the virus was not that serious, then, and almost the next breath, we were told that millions would die.
This contradictory information was presented in such a way so intimidatingly logical that it was difficult, if not impossible, to question it. If the media is good at one thing, it is instilling fear. As time went on, we learn to fear others, we learned to fear physical contact, and, perhaps most importantly, we learn to fear those who thought and behaved differently than the “experts” demanded that we thought and acted.
The media, in cooperation and with the direction of the oligarchy instilled great amounts of fear in the populace by careful, subtle, and sometimes not so subtle hints. In many cases people didn’t realize that they were in the middle of a process of intimidation until, one day, they woke up and felt afraid. Afraid for their jobs. Afraid for their health. Afraid for the health and welfare of their senior parents. Afraid for the future of their children.
Fear is a very powerful motivator, and under the influence of fear, you can be compelled to do a lot of things that you might not otherwise do.
Normally kind and rational people suddenly became “mask Nazis” where they started to manifest hate toward groups of people or opinions that they had been manipulated into believing was opposed to the common good. As time went on and the hatred and fear progressed it became even easier to become manipulated by the media.
I’m not saying that you should trust no one and sit at home with a tinfoil at on your head but be careful what and who you trust when it comes to the media and the information you’re given.
Remember that the big media players and their governmental cohorts have their own agenda, and that’s the reason why they are big and powerful. They know their job very well.
Part of the solution is the today; we have almost infinite choices when it comes to information. The Internet offers every person the opportunity to look at opinions and offer their own. You need to do your own research, use the intelligence that God gave you, and find sources that speak the real, cold truth.
The bottom line is TRUTH! But be warned. Be certain that what you believe to be truth IS true. It becomes dangerous when you start to act based on completely wrong information or to base your plan of action on it.
Num 13:25 And they returned from searching of the land after forty days.
Num 13:26 And they went and came to Moses, and to Aaron, and to all the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the wilderness of Paran, to Kadesh; and brought back word unto them, and unto all the congregation, and shewed them the fruit of the land.
Num 13:27 And they told him, and said, We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.
Num 13:28 Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there.
Num 13:29 The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains: and the Canaanites dwell by the sea, and by the coast of Jordan.
Num 13:30 And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once, and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.
Num 13:31 But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they are stronger than we.
Num 13:32 And they brought up an evil report of the land which they had searched unto the children of Israel, saying, The land, through which we have gone to search it, is a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof; and all the people that we saw in it are men of a great stature.
Num 13:33 And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
Two of the spies — Joshua and Caleb — did not go along with the majority and tried to convince the Israelites that they could conquer the land. However, the Israelite community believed the majority’s conclusions. All of the spies, except Joshua and Caleb, were struck down with a plague and died.
Joshua lived through the 40 year wandering period, and was named successor to Moses as instructed by God. Joshua completed the task of leading the Israelites into the Promised Land and of taking possession of it. Joshua also was the leader in renewing the Mosaic covenant with their God.
The people chose to believe the ten spies rather than trusting and believing in God. We must believe God since He always keeps His promises.
Arabs and Muslims as well as Blacks do not simply have to sit by and be victims – victims of the terrorists threatening the United States, or of racist morons.
For the first time in American history, we have irrefutable evidence that there is a dangerous and functional foreign-born “fifth column” at work on American soil.
The term “fifth column” has its origin in the ’30s Spanish Civil War, when the military decided to overthrow the Madrid government. With four columns of troops advancing on the capital, their general announced that “the fifth column is within the city” – meaning people secretly in league with the military who would perform acts of sabotage and terrorism from inside the government’s redoubt.
America is threatened as no other nation is by the strategy of planting a “fifth column” inside our society. Why? Because of our openness, our constitutional commitment to civil liberties and our social commitment to treating people as individuals and not members of a faceless group.
Thus, we’ve been having vicious quarrels for 50 years about the appropriateness of the U.S. government’s conduct in dealing with the ideological “fifth column” made up of native-born Americans who were spying for the Soviet Union.
And you’ll find almost nobody who can come up with a defense for the decision during World War II to force Japanese-Americans into internment camps – an act undertaken because of fears of a traitorous “fifth column” sticking like a barnacle to the underside of the Japanese community.
Other nations, even democratic nations, are far more homogeneous than the United States – which means it’s far more difficult for non-citizens to hide themselves from view. A homogeneous country is a country whose citizens have precious little reason to conduct a public debate about racial profiling.
The American melting pot has been this country’s great glory. But at this moment, it poses a specific security and terrorist threat as well. Even as we express concern for the well-being of Muslim- and Arab-Americans and native as well as non-native Blacks in the face of ignorant and vicious yahoos, we also have to confront the very real fact that their neighborhoods and communities have dark crevices and corners where the fifth columnists working for the al-Qaeda network, AntiFA and BLM are finding succor.
The glaring result of this is highlighted by the rioting and destruction in Minneapolis which has spilled over into other enclaves where there are non-homogeneous populations involved in what would seriously qualify as insurrection against the United States.
Arabs and Muslims as well as Blacks do not simply have to sit by and be victims – victims of the terrorists threatening the United States, or of racist morons. They, too, can be heroes just as surely as the four men who took their stand on United Airlines Flight 93 and may have saved the White House.
The best way for the “fifth column” to be smoked out of its hole is for Arabs, Muslims and Blacks to keep a watchful eye on their own communities and to supply authorities with information that may prevent future terrorist acts inside the United States. The FBI has made this very simple – with anonymous hotlines and Internet sites where tips can be posted.
The problem, as I see it, is that political correctness and the fear of being labeled as racist has blunted the self-preservation instinct in good, law-abiding folks to the point of self-hatred and unsubstantiated guilt.
Tolerance was never designed to be a suicide pact.
