In Europe, however, which hosts 8 of the top 10 pharmaceutical exporting countries, planning for vaccine passports began at least 20 months prior to the start of the COVID-19 outbreak.
With the world being told that so-called ‘vaccine passports’ will be required for all international travel in future, and in many countries even to enter shops, restaurants, bars, gyms, hotels, theaters, concerts and sports events, the impression we are being given is that the measure is a direct result of the corona virus pandemic.
In Europe, however, which hosts 8 of the top 10 pharmaceutical exporting countries, planning for vaccine passports began at least 20 months prior to the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. Apparently, the pandemic conveniently provided European politicians with the ‘excuse’ they needed to introduce the idea.
The ‘European Commission’ – the executive body of Europe – first published a proposal for vaccine passports on 26 April 2018. Buried deep in a document dealing with ‘Strengthened Cooperation against Vaccine Preventable Diseases’, the proposal was essentially ignored by the mainstream media.
A road map document issued in early 2019 subsequently set out specific plans for implementing the European Commission’s proposal. The primary action listed in the road map was to “examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccination card/passport” for European citizens that is “compatible with electronic immunization information systems and recognized for use across borders.” The plan aimed for a legislative proposal to be issued in Europe by 2022. SOURCE: https://www.globalresearch.ca/european-plans-vaccine-passports-place-20-months-prior-pandemic/5741702
Isn’t is amazing how the “Conspiracy theorists” have been far more accurate than the “Scientists” “Government officials” and “Medical experts” since March of 2020. There must be a reason for it.
The tech giant confirmed that it is publishing anonymized data for 131 countries and regions around the world to show how people have moved during the course of the pandemic that has now infected over 1 million people.
Google on Friday, April 3, 2020 announced that it has started releasing global location data in an effort to help public health officials track how people are moving during lockdowns and orders to stay at home around the world.
The tech giant confirmed that it is publishing anonymized data for 131 countries and regions around the world to show how people have moved during the course of the pandemic that has now infected over 1 million people.
The information is gathered using user data from Google Maps and other Google services.
The novel 1984 was never intended as an operations manual but it certainly seems to have become one.
Here’s something you might want to cut and paste to follow off-line; How to turn off location tracking on an Android device 1.) Open the Settings app on your Android and look for either the “Connections” tab or, depending on your phone, the “Privacy” tab. 2.) Tap “Location” and toggle the switch to off. 3.) You can also tap “Emergency Location Service” and “Google Location Sharing” to switch off location-tracking features there as well.
A top Harvard scientist was charged Tuesday, 3-31-2020 with lying to the Pentagon and the National Institutes of Health about his involvement in a program run by the Chinese government and a Chinese university.
A top Harvard scientist was charged Tuesday, 3-31-2020 with lying to the Pentagon and the National Institutes of Health about his involvement in a program run by the Chinese government and a Chinese university.
A federal criminal complaint says Charles Lieber gave false statements about his participation in the Thousand Talents Program, which U.S. officials say is a conduit for economic espionage. The filing also says that Lieber, chair of Harvard’s department of chemistry and chemical biology, raked in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in salary and living expenses from the Wuhan University of Technology, along with $1.5 million to build a laboratory in China.
Human nature demands that we find a guilty party when something bad happens… so I was at first very skeptical about the noise churning in the background of all this about a supposed Chinese Government’s role.
Human nature demands that we find a guilty party when something bad happens… so I was at first very skeptical about the noise churning in the background of all this about a supposed Chinese Government’s role.
But perhaps I was wrong..
.. here is an expat in china fluent in Chinese who I been following for a while on separate stuff. The young man is by no means a crackpot and has sources: (Video run time:10:02)
Human nature demands that we find a guilty party when something bad happens… so I was at first very skeptical about the noise churning in the background of all this about a supposed Chinese Government’s role.
Human nature demands that we find a guilty party when something bad happens… so I was at first very skeptical about the noise churning in the background of all this about a supposed Chinese Government’s role.
But perhaps I was wrong..
.. here is an expat in china fluent in Chinese who I been following for a while on separate stuff. The young man is by no means a crackpot and has sources: (Video run time:10:02)
Covid-19 had us all fooled, but now we might have finally found its secret.
I am NOT a doctor. This is NOT intended to be taken as medical advice. This post is for informational purposes only. As always, do your own research and make your own medical decisions in conjunction with your own medical professional.
In the last 3–5 days, a mountain of anecdotal evidence has come out of NYC, Italy, Spain, etc. about COVID-19 and characteristics of patients who get seriously ill. It’s not only piling up but now leading to a general field-level consensus backed up by a few previously little-known studies that we’ve had it all wrong the whole time. Well, a few had some things eerily correct (cough Trump cough), especially with Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin.
There is no ‘pneumonia’ nor ARDS. At least not the ARDS with established treatment protocols and procedures we’re familiar with. Ventilators are not only the wrong solution, but high pressure intubation can actually wind up causing more damage than without, not to mention complications from tracheal scarring and ulcers given the duration of intubation often required… They may still have a use in the immediate future for patients too far to bring back with this newfound knowledge, but moving forward a new treatment protocol needs to be established so we stop treating patients for the wrong disease.
The past 48 hours or so have seen a huge revelation: COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia (starving your body of oxygen) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells. People are simply desaturating (losing o2 in their blood), and that’s what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them, not any form of ARDS or pneumonia. All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes, this overwhelms the natural defenses against pulmonary oxidative stress and causes that nice, always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs. Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory ‘tire out’ or fatigue.
The lungs, in particular, have 3 primary defenses to maintain “iron homeostasis”, 2 of which are in the alveoli, those little sacs in your lungs we talked about earlier. The first of the two are little macrophages that roam around and scavenge up any free radicals like this oxidative iron. The second is a lining on the walls (called the epithelial surface) which has a thin layer of fluid packed with high levels of antioxidant molecules.. things like ascorbic acid (AKA Vitamin C) among others. Well, this is usually good enough for naturally occurring rogue iron ions but with COVID-19 running rampant your body is now basically like a progressive state letting out all the prisoners out of the prisons… it’s just too much iron and it begins to overwhelm your lungs’ countermeasures, and thus begins the process of pulmonary oxidative stress. This leads to damage and inflammation, which leads to all that nasty stuff and damage you see in CT scans of COVID-19 patient lungs. Ever noticed how it’s always bilateral? (both lungs at the same time) Pneumonia rarely ever does that, but COVID-19 does… EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Eventually, if the patient’s immune system doesn’t fight off the virus in time before their blood oxygen saturation drops too low, ventilator or no ventilator, organs start shutting down. No fuel, no work. The only way to even try to keep them going is max oxygen, even a hyperbaric chamber if one is available on 100% oxygen at multiple atmospheres of pressure, just to give what’s left of their functioning hemoglobin a chance to carry enough o2 to the organs and keep them alive.
Best case scenario? Treatment regimen early, before symptoms progress too far. Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin has shown fantastic, albeit critics keep mentioning ‘anecdotal’.
All that hilariously misguided and counterproductive criticism the media piled on chloroquine (purely for political reasons) as a viable treatment will now go down as the biggest Fake News blunder to rule them all. The media actively engaged their activism to fight ‘bad orange man’ at the cost of thousands of lives. Shame on them.
Covid-19 had us all fooled, but now we might have finally found its secret.
I am NOT a doctor. This is NOT intended to be taken as medical advice. This post is for informational purposes only. As always, do your own research and make your own medical decisions in conjunction with your own medical professional.
In the last 3–5 days, a mountain of anecdotal evidence has come out of NYC, Italy, Spain, etc. about COVID-19 and characteristics of patients who get seriously ill. It’s not only piling up but now leading to a general field-level consensus backed up by a few previously little-known studies that we’ve had it all wrong the whole time. Well, a few had some things eerily correct (cough Trump cough), especially with Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin.
There is no ‘pneumonia’ nor ARDS. At least not the ARDS with established treatment protocols and procedures we’re familiar with. Ventilators are not only the wrong solution, but high pressure intubation can actually wind up causing more damage than without, not to mention complications from tracheal scarring and ulcers given the duration of intubation often required… They may still have a use in the immediate future for patients too far to bring back with this newfound knowledge, but moving forward a new treatment protocol needs to be established so we stop treating patients for the wrong disease.
The past 48 hours or so have seen a huge revelation: COVID-19 causes prolonged and progressive hypoxia (starving your body of oxygen) by binding to the heme groups in hemoglobin in your red blood cells. People are simply desaturating (losing o2 in their blood), and that’s what eventually leads to organ failures that kill them, not any form of ARDS or pneumonia. All the damage to the lungs you see in CT scans are from the release of oxidative iron from the hemes, this overwhelms the natural defenses against pulmonary oxidative stress and causes that nice, always-bilateral ground glass opacity in the lungs. Patients returning for re-hospitalization days or weeks after recovery suffering from apparent delayed post-hypoxic leukoencephalopathy strengthen the notion COVID-19 patients are suffering from hypoxia despite no signs of respiratory ‘tire out’ or fatigue.
The lungs, in particular, have 3 primary defenses to maintain “iron homeostasis”, 2 of which are in the alveoli, those little sacs in your lungs we talked about earlier. The first of the two are little macrophages that roam around and scavenge up any free radicals like this oxidative iron. The second is a lining on the walls (called the epithelial surface) which has a thin layer of fluid packed with high levels of antioxidant molecules.. things like ascorbic acid (AKA Vitamin C) among others. Well, this is usually good enough for naturally occurring rogue iron ions but with COVID-19 running rampant your body is now basically like a progressive state letting out all the prisoners out of the prisons… it’s just too much iron and it begins to overwhelm your lungs’ countermeasures, and thus begins the process of pulmonary oxidative stress. This leads to damage and inflammation, which leads to all that nasty stuff and damage you see in CT scans of COVID-19 patient lungs. Ever noticed how it’s always bilateral? (both lungs at the same time) Pneumonia rarely ever does that, but COVID-19 does… EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Eventually, if the patient’s immune system doesn’t fight off the virus in time before their blood oxygen saturation drops too low, ventilator or no ventilator, organs start shutting down. No fuel, no work. The only way to even try to keep them going is max oxygen, even a hyperbaric chamber if one is available on 100% oxygen at multiple atmospheres of pressure, just to give what’s left of their functioning hemoglobin a chance to carry enough o2 to the organs and keep them alive.
Best case scenario? Treatment regimen early, before symptoms progress too far. Hydroxychloroquine with Azithromicin has shown fantastic, albeit critics keep mentioning ‘anecdotal’.
All that hilariously misguided and counterproductive criticism the media piled on chloroquine (purely for political reasons) as a viable treatment will now go down as the biggest Fake News blunder to rule them all. The media actively engaged their activism to fight ‘bad orange man’ at the cost of thousands of lives. Shame on them.
COVID-19 in older adults and seriously ill persons mostly kills by respiratory failure, progressing over a few hours or days from a sensation of breathlessness to a losing struggle to breathe. Only a minority of elderly persons who are put on ventilators survive to leave the hospital, and most have become more disabled from being very sick and mostly immobile.
On March 26, 2020 the L.A. Times ran a story about the lack of ventilators available to treat acute cases of the COVID-19 virus.
“It’s a choice most doctors never thought they would have to make: Who lives and who dies.
But in coming weeks, if COVID-19 continues to surge, such decisions will be inevitable.
The coronavirus will attack so many people’s lungs that thousands could show up at hospitals gasping for air and will need to be hooked up to machines that breathe for them. But there won’t be enough ventilators for everyone, forcing doctors to make impossible calls about which lives to save.” is what the article said.
It went on to decry that there will be doctors who will have to decide, based on lack of equipment, whether to “save” an 80 year old grandpa or a 20 year old both of whom are in sever respiratory distress.
There are a few problems with the L.A. Times story.
First off, up to this point, the vast majority of those who are severely stricken with COVID-19 are in the senior age range, (60 and above). The cohort of 20 year olds who exhibit any symptoms at all are, so far, infinitesimal. So, the Times article is setting up a “straw man” false choice.
Secondly, during his press briefing on Saturday, April 4, 2020, president Trump was asked about the shortage of ventilators complained about by New York governor Cuomo. His response was that perhaps the better question for examination is what can be done to prevent the need for the ventilators since no one would be comfortable with the answer. None of the media people asked the obvious follow up question, why would they not be comfortable?
Here is the terrible, horrible truth.
COVID-19 in older adults and seriously ill persons mostly kills by respiratory failure, progressing over a few hours or days from a sensation of breathlessness to a losing struggle to breathe. Only a minority of elderly persons who are put on ventilators survive to leave the hospital, and most have become more disabled from being very sick and mostly immobile. Older adults already living with eventually fatal illnesses and their families might make decisions to avoid all this and accept that a serious case of COVID-19 is likely the end of their lives.
Ventilators are no panacea for coronavirus patients. Research shows that most patients placed on the breathing machines still die, (upwards of 80%) — and ventilators themselves can cause fatal infections.
Patients end up on a ventilator when their lungs can no longer deliver enough oxygen to keep the body going. It’s an extreme measure. Patients are given sedation so that they go to sleep and then the doctors provide a paralytic that stops their breathing.
Next, they insert a long plastic tube through the trachea and vocal cords that allows a machine to deliver puffs of highly oxygenated air to the lungs. (This is done by cutting a hole in the neck called a tracheotomy).
The ventilator itself can do damage to the lung tissue based on how much pressure is required to help oxygen get processed by the lungs. Coronavirus patients often need dangerously high levels of both pressure and oxygen because their lungs have so much inflammation. Also, ventilators create a path for a wide range of infections to reach the lungs.
These are unpleasant facts but they must be faced.
Every one of us at high risk because of age or illness should be setting goals and making decisions about the desirability of hospitalization and ventilator support—yet no one is talking about making and using COVID-19 advance care plans.
Having the opportunity to make decisions ahead of becoming ill with COVID-19 is especially important for those who decide not to take the conventional pattern of going to the hospital and/or being put on a ventilator. These discussions are difficult.
We need to be having these discussions and decisions now.
COVID-19 in older adults and seriously ill persons mostly kills by respiratory failure, progressing over a few hours or days from a sensation of breathlessness to a losing struggle to breathe. Only a minority of elderly persons who are put on ventilators survive to leave the hospital, and most have become more disabled from being very sick and mostly immobile.
On March 26, 2020 the L.A. Times ran a story about the lack of ventilators available to treat acute cases of the COVID-19 virus.
“It’s a choice most doctors never thought they would have to make: Who lives and who dies.
But in coming weeks, if COVID-19 continues to surge, such decisions will be inevitable.
The coronavirus will attack so many people’s lungs that thousands could show up at hospitals gasping for air and will need to be hooked up to machines that breathe for them. But there won’t be enough ventilators for everyone, forcing doctors to make impossible calls about which lives to save.” is what the article said.
It went on to decry that there will be doctors who will have to decide, based on lack of equipment, whether to “save” an 80 year old grandpa or a 20 year old both of whom are in sever respiratory distress.
There are a few problems with the L.A. Times story.
First off, up to this point, the vast majority of those who are severely stricken with COVID-19 are in the senior age range, (60 and above). The cohort of 20 year olds who exhibit any symptoms at all are, so far, infinitesimal. So, the Times article is setting up a “straw man” false choice.
Secondly, during his press briefing on Saturday, April 4, 2020, president Trump was asked about the shortage of ventilators complained about by New York governor Cuomo. His response was that perhaps the better question for examination is what can be done to prevent the need for the ventilators since no one would be comfortable with the answer. None of the media people asked the obvious follow up question, why would they not be comfortable?
Here is the terrible, horrible truth.
COVID-19 in older adults and seriously ill persons mostly kills by respiratory failure, progressing over a few hours or days from a sensation of breathlessness to a losing struggle to breathe. Only a minority of elderly persons who are put on ventilators survive to leave the hospital, and most have become more disabled from being very sick and mostly immobile. Older adults already living with eventually fatal illnesses and their families might make decisions to avoid all this and accept that a serious case of COVID-19 is likely the end of their lives.
Ventilators are no panacea for coronavirus patients. Research shows that most patients placed on the breathing machines still die, (upwards of 80%) — and ventilators themselves can cause fatal infections.
Patients end up on a ventilator when their lungs can no longer deliver enough oxygen to keep the body going. It’s an extreme measure. Patients are given sedation so that they go to sleep and then the doctors provide a paralytic that stops their breathing.
Next, they insert a long plastic tube through the trachea and vocal cords that allows a machine to deliver puffs of highly oxygenated air to the lungs. (This is done by cutting a hole in the neck called a tracheotomy).
The ventilator itself can do damage to the lung tissue based on how much pressure is required to help oxygen get processed by the lungs. Coronavirus patients often need dangerously high levels of both pressure and oxygen because their lungs have so much inflammation. Also, ventilators create a path for a wide range of infections to reach the lungs.
These are unpleasant facts but they must be faced.
Every one of us at high risk because of age or illness should be setting goals and making decisions about the desirability of hospitalization and ventilator support—yet no one is talking about making and using COVID-19 advance care plans.
Having the opportunity to make decisions ahead of becoming ill with COVID-19 is especially important for those who decide not to take the conventional pattern of going to the hospital and/or being put on a ventilator. These discussions are difficult.
We need to be having these discussions and decisions now.
