Analysis of the FISA memo

it is my opinion that the DOJ, FBI and the DNC colluded and conspired to rig a national presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton

FBSpy

I like to do my own research and draw my own conclusions. Sometimes you need to defer to someone who has a better working knowledge of the situation. the information contained in the following link  is the Analysis from an intelligence professional 

Here is the excerpted conclusion he draws:

“In conclusion, it is my opinion that the DOJ, FBI and the DNC colluded and conspired to rig a national presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton, and paid a former foreign intelligence agent (if there is such a thing as a “former” intelligence agent) to assist. I suspected this was the case, as many Americans did. The difference here is that we have it documented by the People’s representatives and released for public viewing.

I’m not sure what consequences will come of this, if any, but please continue preparing for what may come. The Deep State is actively working to increase it’s power and influence. This is a war. As Bracken would say, “act accordingly”.

FBSpy

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018

Errors of omission

“With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it,” the statement said. “As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

Disingenuous? Inaccurate? Grave concerns about material omissions? HORSEHOCKEY!

000000000hidden-in-plain-sight

On last Sunday, prior to the House Intelligence Committee vote to release the FISA memo, FBI Director Christopher Wray was brought in to the House of Representatives secure room location to review the memo for accuracy. After 90 minutes he responded that there were no errors, in fact, contained therein.

On Wednesday, realizing that the White House was going to release the memo over his objection, the FBI issued a terse two-paragraph message laying bare its worries about the document.

“With regard to the House Intelligence Committee’s memorandum, the FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it,” the statement said. “As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

Disingenuous? Inaccurate? Grave concerns about material omissions? HORSEHOCKEY!

The FBI & Justice Department had “stonewalled the House Oversight Committee for better than a year until they finally were forced to produce documents regarding the activities surrounding the FISA investigation under threat of subpoena and charges of Contempt of Congress.

After Chairman Nunes personally took FBI Director Christopher Wray to view the “Intel Memo” on Sunday night, and prior to the House Intel Committee vote to release the memo Monday evening, FBI Director Wray sent a Main Justice official and a “counterintelligence official” to view the content.

The two officials – one from the bureau’s counterintelligence division and the other from the legal division. These officials could not point to any factual inaccuracies. The top official within FBI Counter-Intelligence is still the same official who was present during the 2016/2017 “Trump Operation. His name is Bill Priestap.

On the trail to get this far, we have been introduced to a number of Department of Justice and FBI players. Names like FBI Agent Peter Strzok; his mistress FBI Attorney Lisa Page; their ideological comrade deposed Assistant FBI Director Andrew McCabe; FBI Chief Legal Counsel James Baker; DOJ-NSD head John P Carlin; along with DOJ Deputy Bruce Ohr; and his wife, Fusion-GPS contract employee Nellie Ohr. Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson and his wife Mary Jacoby. These are a few of the names that have hit the headlines as a result of ongoing investigations into the politicization of the FBI and DOJ.

…. But there’s one name ALWAYS conspicuously absent, FBI Director of Counterintelligence, Bill Priestap.

When you understand how central Bill Priestap is to the entire 2016/2017 ‘Russian Conspiracy Operation‘, the absence of his name, amid all others, creates a curiosity.
Bill Priestap is the head of the FBI Counterintelligence operation. He was FBI Agent Peter Strozk’s direct boss. If anyone in congress really wanted to know if the FBI paid for the Christopher Steele Dossier, Bill Priestap is the guy who would know. That’s why Devin Nunes wanted to talk to him.

So there we have FBI Director James Comey telling congress on March 20th, 2017, that the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it.

Apparently, according to Comey, Bill Priestap carries a great deal of influence if he could get his boss to NOT perform a statutory obligation simply by recommending he doesn’t do it.

Then again, Comey’s blame-casting there is really called creating a “fall guy”. FBI Director James Comey is ducking responsibility in March 2017 by blaming FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap for not informing congress of the operation that began in July 2016. (9 months prior).

At that moment, that very specific moment during that March 20th hearing, anyone who watches these hearings closely could see Comey was creating his own exit from getting ensnared in the consequences from the wiretapping and surveillance operation of President Donald Trump. In essence, Bill Priestap is James Comey’s shield from liability.

But more curiously for current discussion, there has been NO MENTION of Bill Priestap in any of the media revelations, despite his centrality to all of it.

Bill Priestap would have needed to authorize Peter Strzok to engage with Christopher Steele over the “Russian Dosssier”.

Bill Priestap would have needed to approve of the underlying documents that were used for both FISA applications (June/July and Sept/Oct).

Bill Priestap would be the person to approve of paying, or reimbursing, Christopher Steele for the Russian Dossier used in their counterintelligence operation and subsequent FISA application.

Without Bill Priestap involved, approvals, etc. the entire Russian/Trump Counterintelligence operation just doesn’t happen. Heck, James Comey’s March testimony in that regard is also evidence of Priestap’s importance.

So we all can see that Bill Priestap is a central figure.
•FBI Director James Comey defers to him;
•FBI Special Agent in Counterintelligence Peter Strzok reports to him.
Yet there’s absolutely no mention of Bill Priestap in any of the explosive investigative story-lines in the entire two months this story was breaking headlines.

Why?

spy-vs-spy

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018

 

Wink, Wink, Nudge, Nudge

this is the subtle art of getting the people to give up their liberties and freedoms and make them look forward to it.

000000000Cass-Sunstein

With many from the Deep State and the DC Sewer scrabling to keep one step ahead of a vacation at the Graybar Hotel, we might want to remember a character from Barack Hussein Obama’s inner circle. A critter by the name of Cass Sunstein.

Cass Sunstein, a friend of Obama’s from his University of Chicago Law School days, spent four-plus years running the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). It’s an obscure but exceedingly powerful perch that enabled Sunstein to put his imprint on everything from fuel efficiency standards and the redesign of the food pyramid to the rules for the landmark health care and Wall Street overhauls.

Sunstein used his office as a laboratory for his brand of “progressive paternalism” — his self-described and seemingly paradoxical approach to structuring prompts for people that promote their welfare by protecting them from their own more self-destructive impulses.

Sunstein’s approach is built on behavioral economics, which has upended centuries of belief that individuals are rational actors who will act in their own best interest left to their own devices. The science behind behavioral economics is largely accepted by academics, but applying it in the policy realm is controversial.  Detractors conjure up Big Brother and with good reason.

His latest book is called “Simpler: The Future of Government”. It’s a kind of follow-up to Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness.

Sunstein drew a straight line from Obama’s embrace of the office back to Ronald Reagan. In a bid to choke off burdensome regulatory mandates, Reagan insisted that the benefits of new rules outweighed their costs.

Now why is this a big deal?
Does anyone remember Barack Hussein Obama signing an executive order instructing the Gov. to use Behavioral Science to persuade the public?”
Quote:
“Behavioral insights and public policy: Can the former be used to craft solutions for the latter?
Traditionally, many government policies are designed on the basis of how people should behave and an assumption that this behavioral is rational. Yet both individuals and organizations make many decisions that systematically depart from what is rational. The result? Policies that are ineffective or even backfire.
But using insights gleaned from behavioral economics, psychology and other social sciences, you can craft better policies that have more successful outcomes.
Better Public Policy from Behavioral Insights.”

“Led by a renowned group of scholars and practitioners working in this rapidly expanding field, this program will introduce you to cutting-edge research from various social science disciplines and how these can be used to build more effective policies. You will examine how behavioral insights can inform the development of nontraditional policy tools and why these can be more impactful and cost-effective than traditional policy tools.
OK, well this is the class that teaches this concept to future leaders and gov. officials.”

The intent is to “Nudge” people into accepting political policy even when they don’t want it.

Why should you care?

Because this is the subtle art of getting the people to give up their liberties and freedoms and make them look forward to it.

Among other directives, Obama’s order authorized the government to “recruit behavioral science experts to join the Federal Government as necessary,” and to “strengthen agency relationships with the research community to better use empirical findings from the behavioral sciences.”
In other words, it sanctioned the sharing among government agencies of an entirely new set of data points on the private activities and tendencies of the American people.

Add to this the NSA data collection of texts, phone calls and internet usage of every American and you have a true-life George Orwell scenario. And, with artificial intelligence “appliances” like “Alexa” and “Cortana” et al the populace is spending their own money to buy the eyes and ears of Big Brother. They are carefully forging the chains of their own slavery.

We can only hope that President Trump succeeds in reconciling the concept of individual sovereignty with conscientious participation in the American political process. We have closely observed the manner in which well-meaning small-town politicians and policy makers often accept, unthinkingly, their increasingly marginal role in shaping the quality of their own lives, as well as those of the people whom they serve.

American public policy is plagued by inscrutable and corrupt motives on a national scale, a fundamental problem which individuals, families and communities must strive to solve.

This can only be achieved if Americans rediscover the principal role each citizen plays in enriching the welfare of our Republic and takes personal responsibility for their actions, lives and welfare of themselves and their families.

000000000Big-Brother01

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018

 

The winds of change

“What has prompted the sudden flurry or resignations of “high-profile” actors between October 2017 and December 2017?”

000000000Winds-of-change

Suddenly, after the FBI Director had the opportunity of reviewing the House Intelligence Committee memo, Andrew McCabe has been “removed” from his post as deputy director. Happenstance? Coincidence?

There have been rumblings that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, (who was responsible, according to reports for extending the surveillance of Donald Trumps’ campaign), is also mentioned in the memo and soon will also be on his way out the door.

The House Intelligence Committee on Monday voted along straight party lines, with all Democrats voting “NO” to release the memo in question. The President has five days to object, but reports are the memo will come out soon… perhaps very soon.

President Trump’s recent executive order has declared a “national emergency” as a declaration of war against all forms of crime – not just human trafficking and human rights abuses.

The question then becomes; “What has prompted the sudden flurry or resignations of “high-profile” private sector persons between October 2017 and December 2017?” “Did they have advance warning that “something” was about to go down?” “What, if anything, do they have in common?”

Photo (1-50)
(Click photo to enlarge)
Last First Title Organization Stock Ticker Date Resignation Announced
Bookmark: #patricia-barbizet
Patricia Barbizet, CEO, Artemis (Christie's, Vivendi, NBC Universal), EPA: VIV
1. Barbizet Patricia CEO Artemis (Christie’s, Vivendi, NBC Universal) VIV 11/29/2017
Bookmark: #david-brady
David Brady, CEO, Red Cross Texas Gulf Coast Region,
2. Brady David CEO Red Cross Texas Gulf Coast Region 10/28/2017
Bookmark: #john-bryant
John Bryant, CEO, Kellogg's, K
3. Bryant John CEO Kellogg’s K 09/28/2017
Bookmark: #mike-cagney
Mike Cagney, CEO, SoFi, SOFI
4. Cagney Mike CEO SoFi SOFI 09/15/2017
Bookmark: #kenneth-chenault
Kenneth Chenault, CEO, American Express, AMEX
5. Chenault Kenneth CEO American Express AMEX 10/18/2017
Bookmark: #bill-delaney
Bill DeLaney, CEO, Sysco, SYY
6. DeLaney Bill CEO Sysco SYY 01/01/2018
Bookmark: #chad-dickerson
Chad Dickerson, CEO, Etsy, ETSY
7. Dickerson Chad CEO Etsy ETSY 05/03/2017
Bookmark: #mickey-drexler
Mickey Drexler, CEO, J. Crew, JCREW
8. Drexler Mickey CEO J. Crew JCREW 06/05/2017
Bookmark: #wolfgang-duerheimer
Wolfgang Duerheimer, CEO, Bentley, VLKAY
9. Duerheimer Wolfgang CEO Bentley VLKAY 09/22/2017
Bookmark: #steve-ells
Steve Ells, CEO, Chipotle, CMG
10. Ells Steve CEO Chipotle CMG 11/29/2017
Bookmark: #charlie-ergen
Charlie Ergen, CEO, Dish Network, DISH
11. Ergen Charlie CEO Dish Network DISH 12/05/2017
Bookmark: #trevor-fetter
Trevor Fetter, CEO, Tenet Healthcare, THC
12. Fetter Trevor CEO Tenet Healthcare THC 09/01/2017
Bookmark: #christina-galanis
Christina Galanis, CEO, HealthlinkNY, HIE
13. Galanis Christina CEO HealthlinkNY HIE 12/18/2017
Bookmark: #carlos-gomez
Carlos Gomez, CEO, NYPD,
14. Gomez Carlos CEO NYPD 12/21/2017
Bookmark: #sam-haskell
Sam Hasell, CEO, Miss American Organization, MAO
15. Haskell Sam CEO Miss America Organization MAO 12/21/2017
Bookmark: #stephen-hemsley
Stephen Hemsley, CEO, UnitedHealth, UNH
16. Hemsley Stephen CEO UnitedHealth UNH 08/17/2017
Bookmark: #erik-huggers
Erik Huggers, CEO, Vevo (Sony, Google Abu Dhabi Media), VEVO
17. Huggers Erik CEO Vevo (Sony, Google Abu Dhabi Media) VEVO 12/15/2017
Bookmark: #robert-iger
Robert Iger, CEO, Disney (ABC), DIS
18. Iger Robert CEO Disney (ABC) DIS 10/04/2017
Bookmark: #jeff-immelt
Jeff Immelt, CEO, GE, GE
19. Immelt Jeff CEO GE GE 06/12/2017
Bookmark: #joseph-jimenez
Joseph Jimenez, CEO, Novartis, NVS
20. Jimenez Joseph CEO Novartis NVS 09/04/2017
Bookmark: #travis-kalanick
Travis Kalanick, CEO, Uber, UBER
21. Kalanick Travis CEO Uber UBER 06/21/2017
Bookmark: #david-karp
David Karp, CEO, Tumblr (Yahoo), YHOO
22. Karp David CEO Tumblr (Yahoo) YHOO 11/27/2017
Bookmark: #alex-kozinski
Alex Kozinski, Judge, 9th Circuit Court,
23. Kozinski Alex Judge 9th Circuit Court 12/18/2017
Bookmark: #jack-latvala
Jack Latvala, President, Florida Senate,
24. Latvala Jack President Florida Senate 12/20/2017
Bookmark: #kevin-mansell
Kevin Mansell, CEO, Kohl's, KSS
25. Mansell Kevin CEO Kohl’s KSS 09/26/2017
Bookmark: #bob-maresca
Bob Maresca, CEO, Bose, BOSE
26. Maresca Bob CEO Bose BOSE 09/06/2017
Bookmark: #michael-j-massey
Michael J. Massey, CEO, PetSmart, PETM
27. Massey Michael J. CEO PetSmart PETM 08/10/2017
Bookmark: #dave-mcclure
Dave McClure, CEO, 500 Startups,
28. McClure Dave CEO 500 Startups 07/03/2017
Bookmark: #bill-mcnabb
Bill McNabb, CEO, Vanguard, VGT etc.
29. McNabb, III Frederick William “Bill” CEO Vanguard VGT… 07/13/2017
Bookmark: #robert-mercer
Robert Mercer, CEO, Renaissance Technologies, RENFUND
30. Mercer Robert CEO Renaissance Technologies REN FD 11/02/2017
Bookmark: #wick-moorman
Wick Moorman, CEO, Amtrack, AMTRAK 
31. Moorman Wick CEO Amtrack AMTRAK 06/26/2017
Bookmark: #david-doc-oconnor
David 'Doc' O'Connor, CEO, Madison Square Garden, MSG
32. O’Connor David ‘Doc’ CEO Madison Square Garden MSG 11/13/2017
Bookmark: #dkwon-oh-hyun
Kwon Oh-hyun, CEO, Samsung, KRX
33. Oh-hyun Kwon CEO Samsung KRX 10/13/2017
Bookmark: #tony-podesta
Tony Podesta, CEO, Podesta Group,
34. Podesta Tony CEO Podesta Group 10/30/2017
Bookmark: #xavier-rolet
Xavier Rolet, CEO, London Stock Exchange, LSE
35. Rolet Xavier CEO London Stock Exchange LSE 11/29/2017
Bookmark: #eric-schmidt
Eric Schmidt, CEO, Google/Alphabet, GOOGL
36. Schmidt Eric CEO Google GOOGL 12/21/2017
Bookmark: #john-schnatter
John Schnatter, CEO, Papa John's, PZZA
37. Schnatter John CEO Papa John’s PZZA 12/21/2017
Bookmark: #ron-shaich
Ron Shaich, CEO, Panera, PNRA
38. Shaich Ron CEO Panera PNRA 11/10/2017
Bookmark: #d-shivakumar
D Shivakumar, CEO, Pepsico, PEP
39. Shivakumar D CEO Pepsico PEP 10/09/2017
Bookmark: #russell-simmons
Russell Simmons, CEO, Def Jam Records, UMG
40. Simmons Russell CEO Def Jam UMG 11/30/2017
Bookmark: #john-skipper
John Skippper, CEO, ESPN, DIS
41. Skipper John CEO ESPN DIS 12/18/2017
Bookmark: #richard-smith
John Skippper, CEO, ESPN, DIS
42. Smith Richard CEO Equifax EFX 09/26/2017
Bookmark: #randall-stephenson
Randall Stephenson, CEO, Boeing, BA
43. Stephenson Randall CEO Boeing BA 12/15/2017
Bookmark: #tim-sullivan
Tim Sullivan, CEO, Ancestry.con, ACOM
44. Sullivan Tim CEO Ancestry.con ACOM 09/12/2017
Bookmark: #joseph-swedish
Joseph Swedish, CEO, Anthem, ANTM
45. Swedish Joseph CEO Anthem ANTM 11/03/2017
Bookmark: #peter-terium
Peter Terium, CEO, Innogy, IGY
46. Terium Peter CEO Innogy IGY 12/20/2017
Bookmark: #alexander-wang
Alexander Wang, CEO, Alexander Wang, ADILT-AWBLKWHT
47. Wang Alexander CEO Alexander Wang ADILT 10/02/2017
Bookmark: #john-watson
John Watson, CEO, Chevron, CVX
48. Watson John CEO Chevron CVX 08/22/2017
Bookmark: #tim-westergren
Tim Westergren, CEO, Pandora, P
49. Westergren Tim CEO Pandora P 06/27/2017
Bookmark: #meg-whitman
Meg Whitman, CEO, Hewlett-Packard, HPQ
50. Whitman Meg CEO HP HPQ 11/21/2017

What do they have in common? Clinton Foundation? John Podesta? Exploitation of personally identifiable data stolen by the rogue C.I.A.? Pedophilia? Money laundering? Drug and child sex trafficking? Murderous satanic rituals? Patent theft?

This Executive Order may very well be an avenue for anyone who was involved to be taken down.

If you read the EO there is mention of US citizens who illegally sell US assets out of the country. Possibly the Clinton foundation, Obama, Holder, Kerry and many others. It has been reported that Obama has retained “high-profile” counsel.

Time will tell. A concern on this is what is to keep the US from just taking corporations much like Venezuela does by simply naming them a corrupt criminal? Also…we haven’t declared a war via Congress since WWII.

There is an old Chinese curse; “May you live in interesting times.” Things are certainly getting interesting.

000000000interesting-times

This page and its links contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

(c) 2018

Ethics Mueller(ed)

Court documents recently filed by the government further rock the credibility of Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller because they show that as FBI Director Mueller he worked to cover up the connection between a Florida Saudi family and the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

spy-vs-spy

There is an old saying; “never go in and gamble against the intelligence community“, yet that seems to be exactly what Rep. Nunes and other Republicans have done. With the contents of the classified Nunes memo from the Intelligence Committee still being withheld from public scrutiny and Democrats saying that the memo is a nothing burger yet blocking it’s declassification and release you have to wonder if there could be some flames in the DOJ and FBI underneath all of that smoke.

The organization Judicial Watch has been active in digging to have information released through FOI requests, going to court when necessary. They have won some important cases regarding stonewalling by the DOJ & FBI. Special Counsel Robert Mueller, (former head of the FBI who is currently “investigating” “collusion between Donald Trump and the Russians), has been the subject of Judicial Watch’s attentions. The following is the result of one of the Judicial Watch lawsuits:

By Judicial Watch —— Bio and Archives–January 23, 2018

Court documents recently filed by the government further rock the credibility of Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller because they show that as FBI Director Mueller he worked to cover up the connection between a Florida Saudi family and the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The documents reveal that Mueller was likely involved in publicly releasing deceptive official agency statements about a secret investigation of the Saudis, who lived in Sarasota, with ties to the hijackers. A Florida journalism nonprofit uncovered the existence of the secret FBI investigation that was also kept from Congress.

Under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI tried to discredit the story, publicly countering that agents found no connection between the Sarasota Saudi family and the 2001 terrorist plot. The reality is that the FBI’s own files contained several reports that said the opposite, according to the Ft. Lauderdale-based news group’s ongoing investigation. Files obtained by reporters in the course of their lengthy probe reveal that federal agents found “many connections” between the family and “individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” The FBI was forced to release the once-secret reports because the news group sued in federal court when the information wasn’t provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The disingenuous statements were issued by FBI officials in Miami and Tampa in a desperate effort to disparage a 2011 story exposing the agency’s covert investigation of the Sarasota Saudis as well as reporting that it had been concealed from Congress. Mueller is referenced in a document index that was ordered by a federal judge to be created in late November 2017. The south Florida judge, William J. Zloch, a Ronald Reagan appointee, asked the FBI to explain where it had discovered dozens of pages of documents in the public-records case filed six years ago. The index reference to then-FBI Director Mueller appears in an item involving an agency white paper written a week after the publication of a news story about the abrupt departure of Saudis Abdulaziz and Anoud al-Hijji from their Sarasota area home about two weeks before 9/11. The couple left behind their cars, clothes, furniture, jewelry and other personal items. “It was created to brief the FBI Director concerning the FBI’s investigation of 4224 Escondito Circle,” the al-Hijjis’ address.

As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands. The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism. Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case. CAIR is a terrorist front group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists. It was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic Association for Palestine.

Is this one more indication that there were those in the Obama Department of justice and FBI who were dedicated to, if possible, derailing a Trump candidacy and then, when that failed, de-legitimatizing and toppling a Trump Presidency?

Liberty hiding

Strange Bedfellows

Let that sink in. Senator Durbin was so “moved” by his young NAKASEC friends, that he will be willing to shut down the Federal Government if they don’t get their way.

00000000bedfellows02

Once again, the Deep State, in collusion with our dysfunctional “public servants” in the Senate, (from both parties) and with the willing cooperation of the (false) news media have fed a willing public a huge portion of chicken crap while telling citizens it was chicken soup. The average Joe & Jane Sixpack don’t understand why there are so many elected officials willing to risk our newly invigorated economy as well as our national security on behalf of illegal aliens.

As usual, there is more to this than meets the eye if you are willing to do a little digging.

On June 15, 2012, then-President Barack Obama delivered a speech in the Rose Garden announcing his intention to unilaterally grant “temporary relief from deportation proceedings” for young people who met certain criteria. The Executive Order, referred to as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, was “not amnesty,” according to Obama, “…this is not immunity.  This is not a path to citizenship.  It’s not a permanent fix.

One month after the president’s speech, a young woman named Tereza Lee met with about 40 young illegal immigration organizers-in-training to tell them the story about how she was the inspiration for Dick Durbin’s original 2001 DREAM Act, which consistently failed to get the votes it needed to pass, even while Democrats had the majorities in the House and Senate.

Last July, Senator Durbin, the Democrats #3 in the Senate and lead man on DACA talks with President Trump, invited HANA Center representatives into a “closed strategy meeting…about [the] Dream Act.” The group boasted about it on their Facebook page on July 24 2017.

Just two months before Dick Durbin had his secret meeting with the HANA Center, the group hosted the literal terrorist murderer Rasmea Odeh of the Arab American Action Network as their “honoree” for a “gala event.” Odeh is infamous for her role in the murders of the young Jewish boys Edward Joffe and his best friend Leon Kanner in a Jerusalem supermarket on February 21st 1969.

May 11, 2011, Senator Durbin re-introduced the DREAM Act in the 112th Congress with the co-sponsorship of 32 members of the U.S. Senate, including California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, as well as Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI), member of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus .

The first week of December 2016, Senator Durbin shared the story of Luke Hwang, a “gifted student and community leader who is currently a PhD candidate in chemistry at the University of Chicago,” on the floor of the US Senate. Senator Durbin used Luke Hwang and several others like him for maximum propaganda advantage.

In Senator Durbin’s speech he explained that Luke Hwang  “…is currently a PhD candidate in chemistry at the University of Chicago. He also works as a researcher at the university. In his spare time, he volunteers with the Chicago Korean American Resource and Cultural Center, an organization that provides services to disadvantaged members of the community.

He failed to mention that the Korean American Resource and Cultural Center (now part of the HANA Center) is part of a radical network run by old pro-North Korean activists.

In December 2017, NAKASEC and affiliates visited the offices of Senators Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, Tim Kaine, Mark Warner and Senator Dick Durbin. According to the NAKASEC website, Senator Durbin was deeply affected by the visit.

Moved by the efforts of members of NAKASEC and HANA Center from Chicago, Senator Durbin confirmed publicly that he will vote “no” on the upcoming CR (Continuing Resolution) if the DREAM Act is not attached.

Let that sink in. Senator Durbin was so “moved” by his young NAKASEC friends, that he will be willing to shut down the Federal Government if they don’t get their way.

Apparently Senators Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Shumer, Tim Kaine, Mark Warner, Lindsay Graham and Flake were also moved to put illegals above our military and our own citizens. Senators, the enemies of America are forever in your debt.

00000000bedfellows01

#ReleaseTheMemo

From the beginning it was a set up to find dirt on Trump campaign insiders and if possible to topple Donald Trump’s presidential aspirations.

000000000Caution-Media-not-real

From the beginning it was a set up to find dirt on Trump campaign insiders and if possible to topple Donald Trump’s presidential aspirations.

Before and after the 2016 election. And while this operation had many moving parts and alternating players, the mission to unseat Trump never changed. And it remains ongoing.

Paul Manafort was wiretapped. Cater Page was wiretapped. Donald Trump Jr. was wiretapped. Jared Kushner was wiretapped. Gen. Michael Flynn was wiretapped. And likely there were others.

And none of it was very legal.


In fact, most of it was very illegal, according to federal law enforcement sources who are blowing the whistle on a sweeping scheme to undermine the Executive branch and the electorate’s choice for president of the United States.

And according to high ranking FBI sources, the Bureau played a definitive role in plotting this sweeping privacy breach. But the FBI had much help from the NSA, CIA, the Office of of the Director of National Intelligence, Treasury financial crimes division under DHS, and the Justice Department, federal law enforcement sources confirmed.

The Deep State caretakers involved are familiar names: James Comey (FBI), John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (ODNI), Loretta Lynch (DOJ), Jeh Johnson (DHS), Admiral Michael Rogers (NSA). And then-director of GCHQ Robert Hannigan who has since resigned from the esteemed British spy agency.

Here is what we now know…

Six U.S. agencies created a stealth task force, spearhead by CIA’s Brennan, to run domestic surveillance on Trump associates and possibly Trump himself.
To feign ignorance and to seemingly operate within U.S. laws, the agencies freelanced the wiretapping of Trump associates to the British spy agency GCHQ.
The decision to insert GCHQ as a back door to eavesdrop was sparked by the denial of two FISA Court warrant applications filed by the FBI to seek wiretaps of Trump associates.
GCHQ did not work from London or the UK. In fact the spy agency worked from NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, MD with direct NSA supervision and guidance to conduct sweeping surveillance on Trump associates.
The illegal wiretaps were initiated months before the controversial Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
The Justice Department and FBI set up the meeting at Trump Tower between Trump Jr., Manafort and Kushner with controversial Russian officials to make Trump’s associates appear compromised.
Following the Trump Tower sit down, GCHQ began digitally wiretapping Manafort, Trump Jr., and Kushner.
After the concocted meeting by the Deep State, the British spy agency could officially justify wiretapping Trump associates as an intelligence front for NSA because the Russian lawyer at the meeting Natalia Veselnitskaya was considered an international security risk and prior to the June sit down was not even allowed entry into the United States or the UK, federal sources said.
By using GCHQ, the NSA and its intelligence partners had carved out a loophole to wiretap Trump without a warrant. While it is illegal for U.S. agencies to monitor phones and emails of U.S. citizens inside the United States absent a warrant, it is not illegal for British intelligence to do so. Even if the GCHQ was tapping Trump on U.S. soil at Fort Meade.
The wiretaps, secured through illicit scheming, have been used by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 election, even though the evidence is considered “poisoned fruit.”

Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who spearheaded the Trump Tower meeting with the Trump campaign trio, was previously barred from entering the United Sates due to her alleged connections to the Russian FSB (the modern replacement of the cold-war-era KGB).

Yet mere days before the June meeting, Veselnitskaya was granted a rare visa to enter the United States from Preet Bharara, the then U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York.

Federal law enforcement sources said Bharara was simply following the orders of Attorney General Lynch, who lobbied the State Department to issue the disavowed Russian a B1/B2 non-immigrant visa. This permitted Veselnitskaya entry into the United States for the sole purpose of entrapping Trump associates to use as fuel to commission wiretaps, federal sources said.
Veselnitskaya may have been paid as well by the U.S. government, FBI sources said. It was reported last week that Steele, who compiled the Trump dossier was paid at least $100,000 from FBI funds as well. But that came later, after the wiretapping was well underway.

The illegal eavesdropping started long before Steele’s dossier. Federal sources said the wiretaps on Trump insiders began in late 2015, almost a year before the 2016 election. The targets then were Flynn and Page, sources confirmed. When no smoking gun was recovered from those initial taps, U.S. intelligence agencies moved to broaden the scope through their newly-formed alliance.

Intelligence garnered from the British eavesdropping, which again was merely a front for the NSA, was then used in August 2016 to secure a legitimate FISA warrant on Manafort, Trump Jr. and Kushner. That warrant was issued on or about September, 2016, federal sources confirm.

It was the third time the cabal of U.S. intelligence agencies sought a FISA warrant for the Trump associates and this time it was approved.

FBI sources said finally obtaining the FISA warrant was important because it provided the agencies cover for previous illegal wiretapping which they believed would never be discovered.

“This would make for an incredible string of Senate hearings,” one federal law enforcement source said. “I don’t think they ever thought he (Trump) would win and information would come out about how they manipulated evidence.”

If they release the memo, the American taxpaying public will demand justice, the Deep State won’t be able to weasel out of it. This is the tip of the iceberg, once it’s been breached, it will be like ants on a carcass until there is nothing left but bare, dry bones.

000000000FISA abuse

Here we go again

Another vehicle attack, this time in NYC!
Could have been much worse, were it not for a courageous school-bus driver
  1. As has been pointed-out by many, including me, this kind of attack is easily put together, and easily exported.
  2. We’ll see more of it!
  3. The single suspect is “middle-eastern,” and yelled “Allahu Akbar” during the attack. What a surprise
  4. NYC’s dufus mayor almost immediately (wishfully) declared that there was no ongoing threat, long before he had any business saying any such thing. Liberals, in and out of the media, typically tell you what they wish were true, not what is actually true!
  5. He also (as usual) declared the suspect a “lone wolf.” More wishful thinking!
  6. Typical ineffective government response will be the imposition of new restrictions on rental vehicles, which will of course, have zero effect on terrorists. Similar attempts to impose burdensome restrictions on the private ownership of guns are also ineffective. Once more, we’re predictably treated to lots of “security theater,” but precious little actual security, as we see!

What can be done by units of government to effectively address this kind of terrorist attack, and terrorist attacks in general?
All the things they don’t want to do:

  1. Restrict immigration from terrorist nations.
  2. Adopt “criminal profiling” as standard LE procedure
  3. Build a wall on our southern border.
  4. Start deporting illegal immigrants.
  5. Jail those who come back.
Again, none of the forgoing will happen any time soon.
What can we do as individuals?
  1. Understand that you’re “on your own.”
  2. Adopt personal preparedness as a way of life. Keep your head up
  3. Tweak your lifestyle so that you reduce exposure to aggravated risk.
  4. Acquire effective caliber weapons, pistols and rifles, and learn how to use them
  5. Go armed
  6. Have heavy weapons (rifles) always nearby
  7. Be prepared to change plans, particularly travel plans, instantly
  8. Be always ready to act decisively when necessary! Think in advance about what you might have to do, so you won’t hesitate. You will not get a second chance!

Terrorists will kill us all, unless we kill them first! It’s time everyone, in and out of government, confront this stark truth squarely!

All must take serious, personal responsibility for their own safety!
Conversely, when you think you want to be a “victim,” history will happily accommodate you, with no wavering, no regrets!
A quote from the movie “A Few Good Men” is appropriate here:

Nothing to see here… move along

The news cycle and the attention span of the public has moved the Las Vegas shooting incident out of the public consciousness. Nothing more of substance about the alleged shooter has been reported. No more news conferences or information regarding the weapons used or the weapons found.

59 souls reported dead and now two more who had survived fleeing the scene have experienced an equally horrific death in a single car crash just weeks after. And what do we hear from the Main Stream Media? Crickets.

According to the Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4964652/Las-Vegas-killer-timeline-chaos-new-revelations.html#ixzz4x1aeToo6

Vegas gunman shot hotel security guard six minutes BEFORE he opened fire on crowd: Police reveal major change to timeline and admit they have no idea why he stopped shooting

  • Originally cops said that Stephen Paddock’s rampage was disturbed by a guard
  • Paddock fired through the door of his room, injuring guard Jesus Campos
  • But on Monday cops changed their story, saying Campos was fired on first 
  • Campos was injured six minutes before Paddock’s 10-minute shooting spree 
  • Cops had used Campos’s interruption to explain why cops weren’t delayed
  • Cops came just after he was hit, by which time Paddock was silent, they said
  • Now there’s a 16-minute gap between Campos being hit and Paddock stopping
  • And it was 20 minutes passed from Campos reporting he was hit to cops arriving
  • Campos wasn’t investigating gunshots, but instead an ‘open-door’ alarm
  • The door wasn’t specified, but was likely the stairwell next to Paddock’s room 
  • Paddock had tampered with it to seal it up before the shooting, SWAT team said 
  • Police are once more baffled why Paddock stopped firing on the crowd 

Reports from air traffic controllers at McCarran airport of active shooters: https://twitter.com/MikeTokes/status/924508300783185921/video/1

“There’s active shooters on the runway. They’re on the airport property”

0:50 / 2:20

Now in today’s Daily Mail there is this story: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5030993/Couple-survived-Las-Vegas-shooting-killed-crash.html#ixzz4x1cq5XTs

Married Californian couple who survived the Vegas massacre die in a fiery car crash just half a mile from their home

  • Dennis and Lorraine Carver died when their car crashed into a metal gate
  • The husband and wife had survived the Las Vegas shooting that killed 59 people 
  • Mr Carver is said to have jumped on top of his wife to shield her from the bullets
  • They escaped uninjured before being killed in the fiery collision two weeks later

Hey, it had to be an unfortunate accident. They died in a car crash didn’t they?

Well, there is this from Huffpo: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html

According to a prominent security analyst, technology exists that could’ve allowed someone to hack his car. Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post that what is known about the single-vehicle crash is “consistent with a car cyber attack.”

Clarke said, “There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers” — including the United States — know how to remotely seize control of a car.

“What has been revealed as a result of some research at universities is that it’s relatively easy to hack your way into the control system of a car, and to do such things as cause acceleration when the driver doesn’t want acceleration, to throw on the brakes when the driver doesn’t want the brakes on, to launch an air bag,” Clarke told The Huffington Post. “You can do some really highly destructive things now, through hacking a car, and it’s not that hard.”

“So if there were a cyber attack on the car — and I’m not saying there was,” Clarke added, “I think whoever did it would probably get away with it.”

Oh, well… I’m sure the Powers that Be will get to the bottom of things and tell us the “truth” soon enough,,, time to get back to the breathless coverage about Paul Manafort.

Perhaps somebody will be fed to the lions

… or, at least somebody might go to jail.

The Obama administration knew that Russia had used bribery, kickbacks and extortion to get a stake in the US atomic energy industry — but cut deals giving Moscow control of a large chunk of the US uranium supply anyway, according to a report Tuesday.

The FBI used a confidential US witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather records, make secret recordings and intercept ­emails as early as 2009 that showed the Kremlin had compromised an American uranium trucking company.

Executives at the company, Transport Logistics International, kicked back about $2 million to the Russians in exchange for lucrative no-bid contracts — a scheme that violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the report said.

The feds also learned that Russian nuclear officials had gotten millions of dollars into the US designed to benefit the Clinton Foundation at the same time then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government committee that signed off on the deals, sources told reporters. (SOURCE: http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/fbi-uncovered-russian-bribery-plot-before-controversial-nuclear-deal/ )

The Obama administration’s decision to approve Rosatom’s purchase of Uranium One has been a source of political controversy since 2015.
That’s when conservative author Peter Schweitzer and The New York Times documented how Bill Clinton collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in Russian speaking fees and his charitable foundation collected millions in donations from parties interested in the deal while Hillary Clinton presided on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States.
The Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions at the time, insisting there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for any member of the committee to oppose the Uranium One deal.

Before the deal was brokered in 2009, the FBI under Robert Mueller—who is now special counsel in the Russia investigation had begun an investigation into corruption and extortion by senior managers of a company owned by the Russian government’s nuclear company, Rosatom.

In 2009 the FBI found enough evidence to suggest Vadim Mikerin, who headed the Rosatom subsidiary Tenex, was corrupt and high-level officials at Rosatom knew about his bribery scheme. In 2014, he pled guilty in a U.S. court case to orchestrating more than $2 million in bribe payments through shadowy accounts in Cyprus, Latvia, and Switzerland.

Here’s the kicker: The Uranium One scandal is not only, or even principally, a Clinton scandal. It is an Obama-administration scandal.

The Clintons were just doing what the Clintons do: cashing in on their “public service.” The Obama administration, with Secretary Clinton at the forefront but hardly alone, was knowingly compromising American national-security interests. The administration green-lighted the transfer of control over one-fifth of American uranium-mining capacity to Russia, a hostile regime — and specifically to Russia’s state-controlled nuclear-energy conglomerate, Rosatom. Worse, at the time the administration approved the transfer, it knew that Rosatom’s American subsidiary was engaged in a lucrative racketeering enterprise that had already committed felony extortion, fraud, and money-laundering offenses.

The Obama administration also knew that congressional Republicans were trying to stop the transfer. Consequently, the Justice Department concealed what it knew. DOJ allowed the racketeering enterprise to continue compromising the American uranium industry rather than commencing a prosecution that would have scotched the transfer. Prosecutors waited four years before quietly pleading the case out for a song, in violation of Justice Department charging guidelines. Meanwhile, the administration stonewalled Congress, reportedly threatening an informant who wanted to go public.

The question has to be asked, “What did Barack Obama know and when did he know it?”

At the time of the 2009 FBI investigation, when the still unidentified Russian lobbyist became an informant, the FBI was led by director Robert Mueller, who is now the special counsel investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia. The investigation was centered in Maryland. There, the U.S. attorney was Obama appointee Rod Rosenstein — now President Trump’s deputy attorney general, and the man who appointed Mueller as special counsel to investigate Trump.

The Obama administration needed to make this case go away — without a public trial if at all possible. Think about this: The investigation of Russian racketeering in the American energy sector was the kind of spectacular success over which the FBI and Justice Department typically do a bells-n-whistles victory lap — the big self-congratulatory press conference followed by the media-intensive prosecutions . . . and, of course, more press conferences. Here . . . crickets.

The Justice Department and FBI had little to say when Mikerin and his co-conspirators were arrested. They quietly negotiated guilty pleas that were announced with no fanfare just before Labor Day. It was arranged that Mikerin would be sentenced just before Christmas. All under the radar. How desperate was the Obama Justice Department to plead the case out? Here, Rosenstein and Holder will have some explaining to do. Mikerin was arrested on a complaint describing a racketeering scheme that stretched back to 2004 and included extortion, fraud, and money laundering. Yet he was permitted to plead guilty to a single count of money-laundering conspiracy. Except it was not really money-laundering conspiracy. Under federal law, that crime (at section 1956 of the penal code) carries a penalty of up to 20 years’ imprisonment — not only for conspiracy but for each act of money laundering. But Mikerin was not made to plead guilty to this charge. He was permitted to plead guilty to an offense charged under the catch-all federal conspiracy provision (section 371) that criminalizes agreements to commit any crime against the United States. Section 371 prescribes a sentence of zero to five years’ imprisonment.

Obama DOJ’s Fraud Section was then run by Andrew Weissmann, who is now one of the top prosecutors in Robert Mueller’s ongoing special-counsel investigation of suspected Trump collusion with Russia.

So, here we have former FBI head Comey, his good buddy and special prosecutor Robert Mueller, current Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, (who appointed Mueller as Special Counsel) and former FBI fraud section chief Andrew Weissman all up to their eyeballs in a cover up of a criminal enterprise.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain…